Effects of AI-Driven Written Direct and Indirect Feedback on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners' Writing Complexity

Abdi Tabari, M., & Wang, Y. (2022). Assessing linguistic complexity features in L2 writing: Understanding effects of topic familiarity and strategic planning within the realm of task readiness. Assessing Writing, 52, 100605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100605.

Azennoud, A. (2024). Enhancing Writing Accuracy and Complexity through AI-Assisted Tools among Moroccan EFL University Learners. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 5(4), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlts.v5i4.529

Bagheri Nevisi, R., & Arab, N. (2023). Computer-generated vs. direct written corrective feedback and Iranian EFL students' syntactic accuracy and complexity. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly, 42(2), 111–148. https://doi.org/10.22099/tesl.2023.46955.3177

 Bai, L., & Hu, G. (2016). In the face of fallible AWE feedback: How do students respond? Educational Psychology, 37(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1223275.

Barrot, J., & Gabinete, M. K. (2021). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in the argumentative writing of ESL and EFL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 59(2), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0012.

Baskara, F. R. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT into EFL writing instruction: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v5i1.858

Benson, S., & DeKeyser, R. (2018). Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy. Language Teaching Research, 23(6), 702–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818770921.

Bonilla Lopez, M., Van Steendam, E., Speelman, D., & Buyse, K. (2018). The differential effects of comprehensive feedback forms in the second language writing class. Language Learning, 68(3), 813–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12295.

Dikli, S., & Bleyle, S. (2014). Automated essay scoring feedback for second language writers: How does it compare to instructor feedback? Assessing Writing, 22, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.006.

Eckstein, G., & Bell, L. (2021). Dynamic written corrective feedback in first-year composition: Accuracy and lexical and syntactic complexity. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211061624

Eckstein, G., Sims, M., & Rohm, L. (2020). Dynamic written corrective feedback among graduate students: The effects of feedback timing. TESL Canada Journal, 37(2), 78–102. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v37i2.1339

El Ebyary, K., & Windeatt, S. (2010). The impact of computer-based feedback on students’ written work. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119231.

Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., McCollum, R. M., & Wolfersberger, M. (2010). Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 445-463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375367

Fazilatfar, A. M., Fallah, N., Hamavandi, M., & Rostamian, M. (2014). The effect of unfocused written corrective feedback on syntactic and lexical complexity of L2 writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 482–488. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.443

Frear, D., & Chiu, Y. H. (2015). The effect of focused and unfocused indirect written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ accuracy in new pieces of writing. System, 53, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.006

Hamano-bunce, D. (2022). The effects of direct written corrective feedback and comparator texts on the complexity and accuracy of revisions and new pieces of writing. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168822 1127643

Hartshorn, K. J., & Evans, N. W. (2015). The effects of dynamic written corrective feedback: A 30-week study. Journal of Response to Writing, 1(2), 6–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.04.012

Hartshorn, K. J., Evans, N. W., Merrill, P. F., Sudweeks, R. R., Strong-Krause, D., & Anderson, N. J. (2010). Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 44(1), 84–109. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.213781

Huang, S., & Renandya, W. A. (2018). Exploring the integration of automated feedback among lower-proficiency EFL learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1471083

Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Lan- guage Writing, 17(3), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001

Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International journal of corpus linguistics, 15(4), 474-496. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu

Mirshekaran, R., Namaziandost, E., & Nazari, M. (2018). The effects of topic interest and L2 proficiency on writing skill among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(6), 1270-1276. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0906.16

McMartin-Miller, C. (2014). How much feedback is enough? Instructor practices and student attitudes toward error treat- ment in second language writing. Assessing Writing, 19, 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.003

Nicolas-Conesa, F., Manchon, R. M., & Cerezo, L. (2019). The effect of unfocused direct and indirect written corrective feed- back on rewritten texts and new texts: Looking into feedback for accuracy and feedback for acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 848–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12592

Niu, R., Shan, P., & You, X. (2021). Complementation of multiple sources of feedback in EFL learners’ writing. Assessing Writing, 49(January), 100549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100549

O’Neill, R., & Russell, A. (2019). Stop! grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Ginger. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3795

Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college‐level L2 writing. Applied linguistics, 24(4), 492-518. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492

Pearson, W. S. (2022). Response to written commentary in preparation for high-stakes second language writing assessment. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00145-6

Polio, C. (2012a). How to research second language writing. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 139–157). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444347340

Polio, C. (2012b). The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004

Polio, C., & Yoon, H. J. (2018). The reliability and validity of automated tools for examining variation in syntactic complexity across genres. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 165-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12200

Qassemzadeh, A., & Soleimani, H. (2016). The impact of feedback provision by Ginger software and teachers on learning passive structures by Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(9), 1884–1894. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0609.23

Ranalli, J. (2018). Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1428994

Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2015). Does language analytical ability mediate the effect of written feedback on grammatical accuracy in second language writing? System, 49, 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.01.006

Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2014). The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Assessing Writing, 19, 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007

Thi, N. K., & Nikolov, M. (2021). How teacher and grammarly feedback complement one another in Myanmar EFL students’ writing. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(6), 767–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00625-2

Thi, N. K., & Nikolov, M. (2023). A systematic review of automated feedback in EFL writing: Advantages, limitations, and implications for practice. Asian Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00182-1.

Thi, N. K., Nikolov, M., & Simon, K. (2022). Higher-proficiency students’ engagement with and uptake of teacher and Gram- marly feedback in an EFL writing course. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17501229.2022.2122476

Thi, N., & Nikolov, M. (2023). Effects of teacher, automated, and combined feedback on syntactic complexity in EFL students' writing. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00180-x

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x

Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003

Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing: Effectiveness of comprehensive CF. Language Learning, 62(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9922.2011. 00674.x

Xu, J., & Zhang, S. (2021). Understanding AWE feedback and English writing of learners with different proficiency levels in an EFL classroom: a sociocultural perspective. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40299-021-00577-7

Zhang, L. J., & Cheng, X. (2021). Examining the effects of comprehensive written corrective feedback on L2 EAP students’ linguistic performance: A mixed-methods study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 54, 101043. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101043

Zhang, T. (2021). The effect of highly focused versus mid-focused written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge development. System, 99, 102493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102493