
تعداد نشریات | 45 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,386 |
تعداد مقالات | 16,990 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 54,669,572 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 17,242,190 |
The Effect of Corrective Feedback on Iranian English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Interlanguage Pragmatics Development | ||
Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
دوره 17، شماره 35، مهر 2025، صفحه 267-282 اصل مقاله (877.47 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2025.65135.2730 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Mehran Memari* 1؛ Fatemeh Hafez2 | ||
1Department of English Language Teaching, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran | ||
2Department of English Language Teaching, Bu-Ali Sina University of Hamedan, Hamedan, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
This study investigates the effect of corrective feedback on Iranian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ interlanguage pragmatic (ILP) development in the context of invitation acceptance and declination. Three intact experimental groups were selected via convenience sampling from an English institute in Tehran: a recast group (N = 13), a metalinguistic group (N = 17), and a clarification request group (N = 12). Prior to the treatment, the groups participated in a dialogic extended discourse pretest. The dialogues for invitation acceptance and declination were drawn from Top Notch, American English File, English Result, and Four Corners. Learners’ performance was assessed using two checklists—one for pragmalinguistic and the other for sociopragmatic knowledge—based on a five-item Likert scale ranging from inappropriate to most appropriate. Treatment sessions were conducted three times per week, each lasting 60 minutes, over a period of one month. The findings reveal that corrective feedback significantly enhanced ILP development. Notably, the metalinguistic group outperformed the recast and clarification request groups. Consequently, metalinguistic corrective feedback proved more effective than recast and clarification feedback in fostering Iranian EFL learners’ ILP development concerning invitation acceptance and declination. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Iranian EFL Learners؛ Interlanguage Pragmatics؛ Corrective Feedback؛ Invitation Acceptance؛ Invitation Declination | ||
مراجع | ||
Ajabshir, Z. F. (2014). The effect of implicit and explicit types of feedback on learners’ pragmatic development. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 463-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.441 Alamri, A. (2023). The Impact of Explicit and Implicit Feedback on the Acquisition of Arabic Grammar for Arabic Second Language Learners. Indiana University. Alemi, M., & Khanlarzadeh, N. (2016). Pragmatic Assessment of Request Speech Act of Iranian EFL Learners by Non-Native English Speaking Teachers. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2016.20363 Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all?: Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in second language acquisition, 28(4), 543-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060268 Ariel, M. (2010). Defining pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. Bagherkazemi, M., & Harati-Asl, M. (2022). Interlanguage Pragmatic Development: Comparative Impacts of Cognitive and Interpersonal Tasks. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 10(2), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2022.121182 Barron, A. (2012). Interlanguage pragmatics: from use to acquisition to second language pedagogy. Language Teaching, 45(1), 44-63. Blum-Kulka, S. (1997). Discourse pragmatics. Discourse as social interaction, 2, 38-63. Chaudron, C. (1986). The role of error correction in second language teaching. Chen, Y.-s., Hsu, H.-T., & Tai, H.-Y. (2023). The relative effects of corrective feedback and language proficiency on the development of L2 pragmalinguistic competence: the case of request downgraders. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching(0). Daneshfar, S., & Moharami, M. (2018). Dynamic assessment in Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory: Origins and main concepts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(3), 600-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0903.20 Derakhshan, A., & Eslami, Z. (2020). The effect of metapragmatic awareness, interactive translation, and discussion through video-enhanced input on EFL learners’ comprehension of implicature. Applied Research on English Language, 9(1), 25-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.22108/are.2019.118062.1476 Derakhshan, A., Malmir, A., Pawlak, M., & Wang, Y. (2024). The use of interlanguage pragmatic learning strategies (IPLS) by L2 learners: the impact of age, gender, language learning experience, and L2 proficiency levels. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 62(4), 1985-2008. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in second language acquisition, 28(2), 339-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.441 Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2013). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Routledge. Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005). Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. ELT journal, 59(3), 199-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci039 García Laborda, J., Arús Hita, J., & Mashhadi, A. (2024). Introduction: Language Teaching Feedback and Assessment Aided by Digital Technologies. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 3-5. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2024.19543 Gass, S. M. (1988). Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies1. Applied linguistics, 9(2), 198-217. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 445-474. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/S0272263112000149 Hussain, S. S., & Khan, A. (2024). Testing EFL Communication: Speech Act Theory and the Communicative Approach. Arab World English Journal, 15(1). Ioannou, S., & Tsagari, D. (2022). Effects of recasts, metalinguistic feedback, and students’ proficiency on the acquisition of Greek perfective past tense. Languages, 7(1), 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/languages7010040 Kartchava, E., & Ammar, A. (2014). The noticeability and effectiveness of corrective feedback in relation to target type. Language Teaching Research, 18(4), 428-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168813519373 Kasper, G., & Roever, C. (2005). Pragmatics in second language learning. Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, 317-334. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Language Learning. Kecskes, I. (2014). Intercultural Pragmatics (Vol. 288). Oxford University Press Oxford. Khorshidi, H. R., & Nimchahi, A. B. (2013). Motivation and Interlanguage Pragmatics in Iranian English Language Learners. English Language Teaching, 6(6), 86-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n6p86 Kitikanan, P. (2019). Do pragmatic awareness and grammatical awareness relate to motivation and severity rating, and do they relate to one another? The New English Teacher, 13(1), 19-19. Lee, S., Lee, E., & Seo, Y.-D. (2023). An integration method for optimizing the use of explicit and implicit feedback in recommender systems. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(12), 16995-17008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12652-023-04714-6 Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. Handbook of Research on Language Acquisition, 2. Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48(2), 183-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00019.x Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034 Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520 Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338-356. Malmir, A., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). The socio-pragmatic, lexico-grammatical, and cognitive strategies in L2 pragmatic comprehension: The case of Iranian male vs. female EFL learners. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2020.120805 Mirzaei-Shojakhanlou, M., Saeedian, S., & Nezakatgoo, B. (2023). The Effect of Recast on EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Development: Patterns of Reciprocity. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 15(32), 178-196. https://doi.org/10.22034/elt.2022.54151.2518 Momenanzadeh, M., Mashhadi, A., Gooniband Shooshtari, Z., & Arús-Hita, J. (2023). English as a foreign language preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge: A quantitative comparative study. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 161-172. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2023.44207.3100 Monjezi, M., & Mashhadi, A. (2021). Corrective Feedback/Talkback in IELTS Writing Task 2: Different Feedback and Talkback Media in Focus. Teaching English Language, 15(2), 335-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.22132/tel.2021.144325 Nemati, M., Alavi, S. M., & Mohebbi, H. (2019). Assessing the effect of focused direct and focused indirect written corrective feedback on explicit and implicit knowledge of language learners. Language Testing in Asia, 9(1), 1-18. https://languagetestingasia.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40468-019-0084-9 Nguyen, M. T. T. (2022). Interlanguage pragmatics as communicative competence. In Communicative Competence in a Second Language (pp. 135-151). Routledge. Nhung, N. T. P. (2020). Noticing hypothesis in second language acquisition. IOSR J. Humanit. Soc. Sci, 25, 26-30. Roever, C. (2005). Testing ESL pragmatics. (No Title). Roever, C. (2011). Testing of second language pragmatics: Past and future. Language Testing, 28(4), 463-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210394633 Rose, K. R. (2009). Interlanguage pragmatic development in Hong Kong, phase 2. Journal of pragmatics, 41(11), 2345-2364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.04.002 Salemi, A., Rabiee, M., & Ketabi, S. (2012). The effects of explicit/implicit instruction and feedback on the development of Persian EFL learners' pragmatic competence in suggestion structures. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(1), 188. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.1.188-199 Seedhouse, P. (1997). The case of the missing “no”: The relationship between pedagogy and interaction. Language Learning, 47(3), 547-583. Sheen, Y., & Mackey, A. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies, 301, 322. Shirkhani, S., & Omidi, S. (2024). Written Corrective Feedback on Intermediate EFL Learners’ Formulaic Errors: The Impact of a Teacher Awareness-Raising Program. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 11(3), 79-100. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2023.19517.2278 Siddiqa, A. (2018). The acquisition of politeness by young EFL learners in France: an exploratory study of interlanguage pragmatic development COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019)]. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focussed instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30(2), 73-87. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295-312. Taghizadeh, R. (2017). Pragmatic competence in the target language: A study of Iranian Learners of English. University of Salford (United Kingdom). Taguchi, N. (2017). Interlanguage pragmatics: A historical sketch and future directions. The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics, 153-167. Taguchi, N. (2019). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics. Routledge New York. Taguchi, N. (2020). Digitally mediated remote learning of pragmatics. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 353-358. Taguchi, N. (2022). Second language pragmatics: A historical overview and future directions. Pragmatics in English language learning, 7-25. Tamayo, M. R., & Cajas, D. (2017). Strategies of metalinguistic and recast feedback during oral interactions. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 19(2), 165-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/22487085.11315 Trosborg, A. (2011). Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints, and apologies (Vol. 7). Walter de Gruyter. Varnosfadrani, A. D., & Basturkmen, H. (2009). The effectiveness of implicit and explicit error correction on learners’ performance. System, 37(1), 82-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.04.004 Yang, Y., & Lyster, R. (2010). Effects of Form-Focused Practice and Feedback on Chinese EFL Learners’ Acquisition of Regular and Irregular Past Tense Forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 235-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990519 Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 135 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 27 |