تعداد نشریات | 44 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,303 |
تعداد مقالات | 16,021 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 52,490,923 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 15,218,075 |
The Utility of Lexical Bundle Teaching for Improving ESP Learners’ Writing Ability on IELTS | ||
Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
مقاله 15، دوره 16، شماره 33، شهریور 2024، صفحه 278-297 اصل مقاله (899.85 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2024.59447.2588 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Maryam Rafieyan1؛ Farzad Salahshour* 2؛ Hanieh Davatgari Asl3 | ||
1Department of ELT, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran. | ||
2Department of English Language, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Iran | ||
3Department of ELT, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Objective: The effectiveness of Lexical Bundle (LBs) instruction for facilitating writing skill development has been a controversial issue in language teaching. This study examined the impact of LBs instruction on English for Specific Purposes (ESP) learners’ performance on IELTS writing task 2. Methods: To this end, first, 60 male and female ESP learners were randomly selected from among 150 ESP learners of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences as participants. Second, these participants were assigned to the experimental group and the control group, each with 30 learners. Both groups were then administered IELTS writing task 2 as a pretest. The experimental group was provided with ten sessions of IELTS-Task 2-related LB instruction. The control group, however, did not receive this kind of instruction. Finally, the researchers administered IELTS writing task 2 to both of the groups anew as a posttest. Results: The results suggest that teaching the relevant bundles had significant positive impacts on ESP learners’ general performance of the relevant writing tasks, task achievement grammatical range and accuracy, vocabulary knowledge, as well as observing cohesive ties and coherence in their writing. Conclusions: The results may provide some useful insights regarding the instruction of LBs in IELTS preparation courses for the ESP learners. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
english for medical purposes؛ ESP courses؛ IELTS؛ LBs؛ writing ability | ||
مراجع | ||
Ahmadi, S., Riasati, M., & Bavali, M. (2019). A Comparison of writing performance of Iranian IELTS candidates facing chart topics vs. table topics in academic writing (Task 1). International Journal of Instruction, 12, 17-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1242a Askarzadeh Torghabeh, R., & Yazdanmehr, E. (2010). EFL learners’ evaluation of the writing tasks in Iran’s TOEFL and IELTS preparation courses in light of the process-oriented approach. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 3 (1), 27-50. Basturkmen, H. (2021). ESP research directions: Enduring and emerging lines of inquiry. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 23, 5-11 http://dx.doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2021.23.02 Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 263-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003 Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371 Boroujeni, A. A. J., Roohani, A., & Hasanimanesh, A. (2015). The impact of extroversion and introversion personality types on EFL learners' writing ability. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(1), 212-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0501.29 Bychkovska, T., & Lee, J. J. (2017). At the same time: Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 university student argumentative writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30, 38-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.008 Cargill, M., & O’Connor, P. (2006). Developing Chinese scientists’ skills for publishing in English: Evaluating collaborating-colleague workshops based on genre analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 207-221. Chen, Y. H., & Baker, P. (2010). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Journal of Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 30-49. Collins, H., & Holliday, A. (2022). Ethnography: Expanding the boundaries in EAP. In A. Ding, & M. Evans (Eds.), Social theory for English for academic purposes: Foundations and perspectives (pp. 43-67). Bloomsbury Cooper, T. (2013). Can IELTS writing scores predict university performance? Comparing the use of lexical bundles in IELTS writing tests and first-year academic writing. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, 42, 63-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.5842/42-0-155 Coxhead, A., & Dang, T. N. Y. (2019). Vocabulary in university tutorials and laboratories. In K. Hyland, & L. L. C. Wong (Eds.), Specialized English: New directions in ESP and EAP research and practice (pp. 120-134). Routledge. Dastpak, M., Riasati, M.J., & Hadipourfard, E. (2021). Looking into the paper vs. computer mode of the IELTS academic writing module. Journal of Language and Translation, 11 (4), 171-190 Ellis, N. C. (2012). Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 17-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/CLLT.2009.003 Ellis, N. C., & Simpson-Vlach, R. (2009). Formulaic language in native speakers: Triangulating psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and education. Journal of Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5, 61–78. Esfandiari, R., Ahmadi, M., & Schaefer, E. (2021). A corpus-based study on the use and syntactic functions of lexical bundles in applied linguistics research articles in two contexts of publications. Applied Research on English Language, 10(4), 139-166. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2021.130833.1787 Eskalieva, S. A., & Jaksulikova, D. (2021). Importance of teaching writing as a language skill. Polish Science Journal, 38 (5), 120-121. Estaji, M., & Hashemi, M. (2022). Phraseological competence in IELTS academic writing task 2: Phraseological units and test-takers’ perceptions and use. Language Testing in Asia, 12 (34), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00180-7 Flowerdew, J. (2019). The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality. Language Teaching, 52 (2), 249-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000041 Ghafar Samar, R., Shokrpour, N., & Nasiri, E. (2018). The applicability of teaching lexical bundles on medical students’ writing proficiency in an EFL context. Teaching English Language, 12(2), 27-44. Giraldo, F. (2019). An English for research publication purposes course: Gains, challenges, and perceptions. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 18, 198-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.26817/16925777.454 Goodfellow, R. (2005). Academic literacies and e leaning: A critical approach to writing in the online university. International Journal of Educational Research 43(8), 481–494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.07.005 Grabowski, Ł. (2015). Keywords and lexical bundles within English pharmaceutical discourse: A corpus-driven description. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 38, 23-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.10.004 Gries, S. T., & Ellis, N. C. (2015). Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning, 65(1), 228-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lang.12119 Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Routledge. Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001 Hyland, K. (2012). EAP and discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee, & M. Handford (Eds.), Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 412-423). Routledge Hyland, K. (2016). General and specific EAP. In K. Hyland, & P. Shaw (Eds.), Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 17-29). Routledge. Hyland, K., & Jiang, K. F. (2021). Delivering relevance: The emergence of ESP as a discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 64, 13-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.06.002 Hyland, K., & Shaw, P. (2016). The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes. Routledge. Hyland, K., & Wong, L. L. C. (2013). Specialized English: New directions in ESP and EAP research and practice. Routledge. Kazemi, M., Katiraei, S., & Rasekh, A.E. (2014). The impact of teaching lexical bundles on improving Iranian EFL students’ writing skill. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 864 – 869. Keyvanfar, A., & Vafaeikhoshkhou, R. (2015). Error taxonomy of TOEFL IBT writing: An Iranian perspective. Journal of Language and Translation, 5(2), 61-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v1i2.6860 Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970) Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. Lan, G., & Sun, Y. (2019). A corpus-based investigation of noun phrase complexity in the L2 writings of a first-year composition course. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 14-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.001 Li, L., Franken, M., & Wu, S. (2018). Chinese postgraduates’ explanation of the sources of sentence initial bundles in their thesis writing. RELC Journal, 50, 37–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033688217750641 Li, Y., & Flowerdew, J. (2020). Teaching English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP): A review of language teachers’ pedagogical initiatives. English for Specific Purposes, 59, 29- 41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.03.002 Lillis, T. M. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. Routledge. Lim, J. M.-H., & Luo, X. (2020). Writing research questions and hypotheses: A genre-based investigation into writers’ linguistic resources in social sciences. ESP Today, 8(2), 206–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2020.8.2.2 MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (2008). Handbook of writing research. Guilford Press. Mirzaei, A., Vincheh, M. H., & Hashemian, M. (2020). Retrofitting the IELTS reading section with a general cognitive diagnostic model in an Iranian EAP context. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 41-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100817 Mur Duenas, M. (2012). Getting research published internationally in English: An ethnographic account of a team of finance Spanish scholars’ struggles. Iberica, 24, 139-156. Nguyen, L. T. C. (2015). Written fluency improvement in a foreign language. TESOL Journal, 6(4), 707-730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tesj.186 Pearson, W., S. (2021). A comparative study of lexical bundles in IELTS writing task 1 and 2 simulation essays and tertiary academic writing. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 15(1), 27-52. Ren, J. (2021). Variability and functions of lexical bundles in research articles of applied linguistics and pharmaceutical sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 50(3), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100968 Rezai, A. (2022). Cultivating Iranian IELTS candidates’ writing skills through online peer feedback: A mixed-methods inquiry. Education Research International, 2(3), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6577979 Saadatara, A., Kiany, G., & Talebzadeh, H. (2023). Bundles to beat the band in high-stakes tests: Pedagogical applications of an exploratory investigation of lexical bundles across band scores of the IELTS writing component. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 61(2), 101-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101208 Salager-Meyer, F. (2008). Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 121-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.009 Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge. Shahmoradi, N., Jalali, H., & Ghadiri, M. (2021). Lexical bundles in the abstract and conclusion sections: The case of applied linguistics and information technology. Applied Research on English Language, 10(3), 47-76. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2021.128024.1703 Shamsabadi, R., Ketabi, S., & Eslami Rasekh, A. (2017). Developing Iranian EAP students’ Writing Skill through Explicit Instruction of Lexical Bundles. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 9(19), 25-52. Shin, Y. K. (2018). The construction of English lexical bundles in context by native and nonnative freshman university students. English Teaching, 73(3), 115-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.15858/engtea.73.3.201809.115 Staples, S., & Reppen, R. (2016). Understanding first-year L2 writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis across L1s, genres, and language ratings. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 17-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.02.002 Tardy, M. C. (2016). Beyond convention: Genre innovation in academic writing. University of Michigan Press. Van Waes, L., & Leijten, M. (2015). Fluency in writing: A multidimensional perspective on writing fluency applied to L1 and L2. Computers and Composition, 38, 79-95. Fluency in writing: A multidimensional perspective on writing fluency applied to L1 and L2. Computers and Composition, 38, 79-95 Wang, W. (2017). Learner characteristics in an EAP thesis-writing class: Looking into students’ responses to genre-based instruction and pedagogical tasks. English for Specific Purposes, 47, 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.04.002 Wingate, U. (2012). Using academic literacies and genre-based models for academic writing instruction: A literacy journey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 26–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.006 Yin, X., & Li, S. (2021). Lexical bundles as an intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary mark: A corpus-based study of research articles from business, biology, and applied linguistics. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 1(1), 1-11. https://www.doi.org/10.22034/efl.2013.79199 Yuliani, W., Bharati, D. A. L., & Warsono, W. (2019). The effectiveness of brainstorming and mind mapping to teach writing the narrative text for students with extrovert and introvert personalities. English Education Journal, 9(4), 459-466. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 173 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 212 |