آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 43 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,253 |
| تعداد مقالات | 15,411 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 51,249,530 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,256,712 |
Overrepresentation and underrepresentation of cohesive devices in EFL learners’ translated and free narrative writings | ||
| Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
| مقاله 11، دوره 16، شماره 33، شهریور 2024، صفحه 214-227 اصل مقاله (920.73 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2024.60104.2603 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Jabal Hassan1؛ Manijeh Youhanaee* 1؛ Zargham Ghabanchi2 | ||
| 1Department of English Language & Literature, University of Isfahan, Iran | ||
| 2Department of English Language & Literature, University of Mashhad, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study aimed at investigating the L2 rhetorical organization of translation and free writing tasks in terms of cohesive devices used by Iraqi intermediate EFL learners in the narrative genre. To do so, 30 Iraqi intermediate EFL learners at Kufa university took part in the study. The participants were asked to translate three narrative texts from Arabic to English and write three narratives related to the general topics given to them as prompts. The narratives were coded and rated by two experts based on Halliday and Hasan’s (1976) framework. The data obtained from translation narratives were compared with a standard translation for each text. Results of the one-sample t-test performed on the scores of translation narratives indicated that Iraqi leaners produce shorter passages in the target language than in the source language; however, they used significantly more times than expected for certain types of cohesive devices. Moreover, comparisons between translated narratives and free narratives indicated no significant difference between the translated and composed narratives. It is argued that patterns of cohesive devices used in English output of the Iraqi EFL learners are compatible with properties of their first language. The findings also show that, unlike English grammatical properties, cohesive devices are not a problematic area and would not lead to fossilized errors in the performance of Iraqi EFL learners. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| cohesion؛ cohesive devices؛ textuality؛ narrative writing؛ free writing | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdul Rahman, Z. A. A. (2013). The use of cohesive devices in descriptive writing by Omani student-teachers. SAGE Open, 1-10. AlAttar, F. H. & Abu-Ayyash, E. A. S. (2020). An investigation of the use of conjunctive cohesive devices in Emirati students’ argumentative essays. British Journal of English Linguistics. 8 (1), 9-25. Alawerdy, A. S., & Alalwi, F. S. (2022). Enhancing English as a foreign language university students’ writing through explicit instruction of conjunctions as cohesive devices: An experimental study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(1), 299-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1053310 Aldera, A. (2016). Cohesion in written discourse: A case study of Arab EFL students. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 7(1) 25-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2813928 Al Khotaba, E. (2022). Cohesive connectivity in Arabic-English translated texts by English as foreign language students. British Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2 (1), 22-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.32996/bjal.2022.2.1.4 Bui. H. P. (2022). Vietnamese EFL students’ use and misconceptions of cohesive devices in writing. SAGE Open. 12(3), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21582440221126993 Bui, H. P, Quang, N. Nguyen, L. T. & Viet. N. T. (2021). Cross-Linguistic approach to analyzing cohesive devices in expository writing by Asian EFL teachers. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 27(2). 1-15 http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2021-2702-02 Chanyoo, N. (2018). Cohesive devices and academic writing quality of Thai undergraduate students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9 (5), 994-1001. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0905.13 Cheng, A. & Tsang. A. (2021). Use and understanding of connectives: an embedded case study of ESL learners of different proficiency levels. Language Awareness, 31(2), 1-20. DOI: 10.1080/09658416.2021.1871912 Connor, U. (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students’ writing. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 17(3), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818409389208 Coyle, Y., Mora, P.F., Becerra, J.S., Improving reference cohesion in young EFL learners’ collaboratively written narratives: Is there a role for reformulation?, System, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102333. Crewe, W. J. (1990). The illogic of logical connectives. ELT Journal, 44(4), 316-25. Crossley, S. A., & D. S. McNamara. (2012). Predicting second language writing proficiency: The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(2): 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01449.x Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1227-1237. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0651-7 El-Gazzar, N. K. (2006). Lexical cohesive devices in Arab students' academic writing: Implications for teaching vocabulary (Doctoral dissertation). Gray, B. (2010). On the use of demonstrative pronouns and determiners as cohesive devices: A focus on sentence-initial this/these in academic prose. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 167-183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.11.003Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman. Halliday, M. K. & Matthiessen, M. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, Routledge. Hammad, E. (2016). Palestinian university students’ problems with EFL essay writing in an instructional setting. In Ahmed, A. & Abouabdelkader, H. (Eds.). Teaching EFL Writing in the 21st Century Arab World (pp. 99-120). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/97837-46726-3_5 Hameed, Y. SH. (2022). Synonymy as a cohesive device in students' English essay writing. Al-Adab Journal, 140(1), 91- 110. http://dx.doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i140.3632 Islami, K. H. Saleh, M. Bharat, D. A. L. (2022). The use of cohesive devices in descriptive text by English training participants at PST. English Education Journal, 12(1), 96-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/eej.v12i1.49052 Kim, M. & Crossley. S. A. (2019). Modeling second language writing quality: A structural equation investigation of lexical, syntactic, and cohesive features in source-based and independent writing. Assessing Writing, 37, 39-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.002 Khalil, A. (1989). A study of cohesion and coherence in Arab EFL college students’ writing. System, 17(3), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(89)90008-0 Leo, K. (2012). Investigating cohesion and coherence discourse strategies of Chinese students with varied lengths of residence in Canada. TESL Canada Journal, 29(6),157–180. doi:10.18806/tesl.v29i0.1115. Liu, M., & Braine, G. (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System, 33, 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.02.002. Lu, X. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 36–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.240859 Mohamed, A. H, & Omer, M. R. (2000). Texture and culture: Cohesion as a marker of rhetorical organization in Arabic and English narrative texts, 31(2), Mohamed-Sayidina, A. (2010). Transfer of L1 Cohesive Devices and Transition Words into L2 Academic Texts: The Case of Arab Students. RELC Journal, 41(3), 253–266. doi:10.1177/0033688210380569 Mohseni, A., & Samadian, S. (2019). Analysis of cohesion and coherence in writing performance of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Issues in Language Teaching, 8(2), 213-242. https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2019.21262.193 Nugraheni. R. (2015). Cohesive Devices in Learners’ Writing. LLT Journal, 18 (1). 51-61. Reid, J. (1992). A computer text analysis of four cohesion devices in English discourse by native and nonnative writers. Journal of second language writing, 1(2), 79-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.24071/llt.2015.180106 Saud, W. I. (2015). Cohesion in the descriptive writing of EFL undergraduates. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2(2), 440-450. http://ijhcschiefeditor.wix.com/ijhcs Wahby, M. (2014). The effect of implementing cohesive ties by Saudi prep-year pre intermediate students on their written texts. European Scientific Journal, 10(4). Xi, Y. (2010). Cohesion studies in the past 30 years: Development, application and chaos. Language, Society and Culture, 31, 139–147. Yang, W., & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23, 31-48. Yasuda, S. (2019). Children's meaning-making choices in EFL writing: The use of cohesive devices and interpersonal resources. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 61 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 52 |
||