آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 44 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,303 |
| تعداد مقالات | 16,047 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 52,589,857 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 15,269,037 |
Clause Complexity in Applied Linguistics Research Article Abstracts by Native and Non-Native English Writers: Taxis, Expansion and Projection | ||
| Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
| دوره 6، شماره 13، آذر 2014، صفحه 57-70 اصل مقاله (229.58 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Farahman Farrokhi* ؛ Sepideh Ghandkaran-Shotorban | ||
| University of Tabriz | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Halliday's Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) has stood the test of time as a model of text analysis. The present literature contains a plethora of studies that while taking the 'clause' as a unit of analysis have put into investigation the metafunctions in research articles of a single field of study or those of various fields in comparison. Although 'clause complex' is another unit of SF analysis, by far there has been only one study on research articles where it was the unit of analysis (Sellami Baklouti, 2011). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to put into analysis the 'taxis', 'expansion' and 'projection' deployed in Applied Linguistics research article abstracts (RAAs) by native (N) and non-native (NN) writers. To this end, 20 Applied Linguistics RAAs (10 by N English writers and 10 by NN English writers on the sub-fields of Discourse Analysis and Language Assessment) were analyzed according to Halliday & Matthiessen's (2013) 'clause complex' framework. The results indicated that there is a significant difference in the use of 'projection' by Ns and NNs, while the distribution of 'taxis' and 'expansion' is the same. The findings also showed what types of 'taxis', 'expansion' and 'projection' were deployed by Ns and NNs. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Systemic Functional Linguistics؛ research article abstracts؛ clause complex؛ taxis؛ expansion؛ projection | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Continuum. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nded.). London: Edward Arnold. Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rded.). London: Arnold. Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2013). An introduction to functional grammar (4thed.). Retrieved April 7th, 2013 from http://books.google.com/books/about/Halliday_s_Introduction_to_Functional_Gr.html?id=odUqAAAAQBAJ Holmes, R. (2013). Genre analysis and the social sciences: an investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. E-reflection an International Multidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal, 2(5), 189 – 213. Hu, G. & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: a comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2795 – 2809. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Lim, J. M. H. (2006). Method sections of management research article: a pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 282 – 309. Lim, J. M. H. (2010). Commenting on research results in applied linguistics and education: a comparative genre-based investigation. Journal of English for academic Purposes, 9, 280 – 294. Malinowski, B. (1935). Coral gardens and their magic. London: Allen and Unwin. Martin, J. (2010). Language, register and genre, in C. Coffin, T. Lillis& k. O’Halloran (eds.), Applied linguistics methods a reader (pp. 12 – 32). London: Routledge. Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Painter, C. (1997). Working with functional grammar. London, Arnold. Martínez, I.A. (2005). Native and non-native writers’ use of first person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 174–190. Ozturk, I. (2007). The textual organization of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 26 (1), 25 – 38. Pandian, A. & Assadi, N. (2010). The ABC’s of functional grammar. Oxford FajarSdn. Bhd. Peacock,M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30(4), 479 – 497. Pho, Phuong Dzung. (2014). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: a study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231 – 250. Salager-Meyer, F. (1992). A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts English for Specific Purposes, 11(2),93 – 113. SellamiBaklouti, A. (2011). The impact of genre and disciplinary differences on structuralchoice: taxis in research article abstracts.An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse &Communication Studies, 31(5), 503 – 523. Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and ResearchSettings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Thompson, J. (2004). Introducing functional grammar. London: Arnold. Ye, D. & Wang, D. (2013). Language varieties of the abstracts in journal articles written by Chinese and American scholars: a contrastive corpus analysis using the gramulator. InternationalJournal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2(2), 15 – 24. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 61 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 73 |
||