دانشگاه تبریز
فهرست نشریات دارای اعتبار وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری
پایگاه استنادی علوم جهان اسلام (ISC)

آمار

تعداد نشریات41
تعداد شماره‌ها1,130
تعداد مقالات13,890
تعداد مشاهده مقاله48,864,440
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله12,586,992
Sattarpour, Simin, Ghassab Sahebkar, Raziyeh, Poorebrahim, Fatemeh. (1401). The Differential Effects of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on Impulsive and Reflective Writing Accuracy. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, (), -. doi: 10.22034/elt.2023.53957.2517
Simin Sattarpour; Raziyeh Ghassab Sahebkar; Fatemeh Poorebrahim. "The Differential Effects of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on Impulsive and Reflective Writing Accuracy". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, , , 1401, -. doi: 10.22034/elt.2023.53957.2517
Sattarpour, Simin, Ghassab Sahebkar, Raziyeh, Poorebrahim, Fatemeh. (1401). 'The Differential Effects of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on Impulsive and Reflective Writing Accuracy', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, (), pp. -. doi: 10.22034/elt.2023.53957.2517
Sattarpour, Simin, Ghassab Sahebkar, Raziyeh, Poorebrahim, Fatemeh. The Differential Effects of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on Impulsive and Reflective Writing Accuracy. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; (): -. doi: 10.22034/elt.2023.53957.2517

The Differential Effects of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on Impulsive and Reflective Writing Accuracy

Two Quarterly Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning University of Tabriz
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 11 دی 1401  XML
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2023.53957.2517
نویسندگان
Simin Sattarpourorcid 1؛ Raziyeh Ghassab Sahebkarorcid 2؛ Fatemeh Poorebrahim email orcid 3
1Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz,, Iran
2Islamic Azad University of Tabriz, Tabriz. Iran
3University of Maraghe, Maragheh, Iran
چکیده
Given the significant role of corrective feedback and individual differences in the process of foreign language acquisition, in the present study, we set out to investigate the effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on impulsive and reflective EFL learners’ writing accuracy. Sixty learners were selected and randomly assigned to three groups including two experimental groups and one control group. The first experimental group received indirect feedback, the second experimental group received direct feedback, and the control group received no feedback. The instrument employed in this study to determine the impulsivity or reflectivity of the participants was Barratt's impulsiveness scale. The results revealed that both direct and indirect corrective feedbacks were effective in reducing the written errors of all the earners. Moreover, no significant difference was found between direct and indirect corrective feedback in terms of increasing writing accuracy. Although there was no significant difference between the impulsive and reflective learners’ performance, the mean scores showed that the latter seemed to benefit more from the indirect type of feedback while their counterparts showed better performance after receiving direct feedback. The findings have implications for EFL teachers and learners.
کلیدواژه‌ها
corrective feedback؛ direct feedback؛ indirect feedback؛ impulsivity؛ reflectivity
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 92


Contact Us | Help & Support | Site Map

Journal Management System. Designed by sinaweb.