|تعداد مشاهده مقاله||49,919,494|
|تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله||13,144,707|
Ethical Challenges of Designing on Application for Reading Instruction Management System (RIMS): A Phenomenological Study
|Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning|
|دوره 14، شماره 29، مرداد 2022، صفحه 198-213 اصل مقاله (1.13 M)|
|نوع مقاله: Research Paper|
|شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2022.48944.2473|
|Arezou Shahmoradi1؛ Behzad Ghonsooly* 2؛ Omid Mazandarani1؛ Ghasem Barani1|
|1English Language Teaching Department, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran|
|2English Language and Literature Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), Iran|
|This study aimed at identifying the ethical challenges encountered when developing a language education virtual environment that acts as a smart platform for managing reading comprehension instruction for EFL/ESL learners. Since Reading Instruction Management System (RIMS) is going to observe, monitor, and supervise the learners' out-of-class activities and help teachers improve their teaching quality, it has to seriously handle humane elements which have not been seriously debated in the related literature on language education software development so far. To this end, this study has devised a qualitative study to further explore the aspects of ethical considerations that have to be considered when developing technological aid. Accordingly, 14 teachers and 14 students were selected based on the purposive sampling method concerning the condition that they will be among the teachers and learners who will use RIMS when it is officially launched in the institution. They were asked to take part in interviews which were held on a one-on-one basis and in Persian, the participants' mother tongue. The data were codded and the emerged ones were then classified under four themes including the challenges related to the teachers, learners, and institutions. Each of these has several aspects which are discussed, accordingly.|
|Ethical Challenges؛ Learning Management System (LMS)؛ Reading Comprehension|
Akbulut, Y., Uysal, Ö., Odabasi, H. F., & Kuzu, A. (2008). Influence of gender, program of study, and PC experience on unethical computer using behaviors of Turkish undergraduate students. Computers & Education, 51(2), 485-492.
Anohina, A. (2005). Analysis of the terminology used in the field of virtual learning. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 91–102.
Banisar, D. (2000). Privacy and Human Rights. An international survey of privacy law and developments, electronic Privacy information center. Washington D. C. 1sted.
Bauman, P. (2002). Modeling Ethics for Distance Learners. Distance Education Report 6(7), 1-2.
Carliner, S., & Shank, P. (Eds.). (2008). The E-Learning Handbook: Past promises, present challenges. San Francisco, US: Pfeiffer, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Casey S, Kirman B, Rowland. D. (2007). The gopher game: a social, mobile locative game with user-generated content and peer review. In International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. New York, NY: ACM Press, 9- 16
Dietz-Uhler, B. (2011). Academic dishonesty in online courses. 2011 ASCUE Proceedings, 71-77.
Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming Technology. New York: Oxford.
Given, L. M. (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. London: Sage.
Heffernan, N., & Wang, S. (2008). Copyright and multimedia classroom material: A study from Japan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 167-180.
Jerman-Blazic, B. & Klobucar, T. (2004). Privacy provision in e-learning standardized systems: status and improvements. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 27(6), 561–578.
Joy. D. (2004). Instructors Transitioning to Online Education. Unpublished Ph. D Thesis. USA: ProQuest.
Kano, H. (2008). Information literacy and morality for the next generation. Okayama, Japan: University Education Press.
Keller Ch, Lindh J, Hrastinski S, Casanovas I, Fernandez G. (2009). The Impact of National Culture on ELearning Implementation: A Comparative Study of an Argentinean and a Swedish University. Educational Media International, 46(1), 67- 80.
Khan, B. H. (2005). Learning Features in an Open, Flexible, and Distributed Environment. AACE Journal, 13(2), 137-153.
Kian, M. (2014). Challenges of Virtual Education: A Report of what are not learned. Electronic Journal of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, (3) 5: 11-22.
Ko, S. & Rusan, S. (2010). Teaching Online: A Practical Guide. Routledge.
Laura. P. (2014). The Year of the MOOC. New York: Times.
Lengel, L., Thurlow, C. & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer-Mediated Communication: Social Interaction and the Internet. London, SAGE Publications.
Lewin, T. (2013). Universities Abroad Join Partnerships on the Web. New York: Times.
Rajasingham, L. (2009). The E-Learning Phenomenon: A New University Paradigm? IGI Global.
Rowe, N. C. (2004). Cheating in online student assessment: Beyond plagiarism. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4 (2).
Sadoughi, M. (2008). Review and proportionality Quantitative research evaluation criteria for qualitative studies. Journal of Humanities Methodology, 55 (14), 9-31.
Schultz, R. (2006). Contemporary issues in ethics and information technology. Hershey, PY: Idea Group Incorporated.
Schutz, K. R., Drake, B. M. & Lessner, J. (2013). Do community college full-time and Adjunct faculties differ in their perceptions of rigor in assigning grades? American Journal of Educational Studies, 6(2).
Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Stewart, B, L. (2004). Online learning a strategy for social responsibility in educational access. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(4), 299 – 310.
Stodel. E. J, Thompson T. L, & MacDonald C.J. (2006). Learners' perspectives on what is missing from online learning: interpretations through the community of inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(3):1-24.
Tladi, L. L., & Seretse, T. E. (2018). Adoption and use of open educational resources at Botswana Open University. Progression, 40(1), 1-12.
Tu, C. (2002). The relationship between social presence and online privacy. The Internet and Higher Education, 5, 293–318.
Van Manen. M. (2001). Researching lived to experience human science for an action-sensitive pedagogy. Ontario: Althouse Press.
Wang, S., & Heffernan, N. (2010). Ethical issues in Computer‐Assisted Language Learning: Perceptions of teachers and learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 796-813.
Zarghami, S. (2009). Philosophy of Information Technology and Education. Tehran: Mabnay-Kherad Press.
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 281
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 191