Interpersonal Behavior: More vs. Less Favorable Teachers

Ahmadi Safa, M., & Doosti, M. (2017). A culturally-adaptive Iranian version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction to investigate English teachers’ interpersonal behavior. Learning Environments Research, 20(2), 199-219.

den Brok, P. (2001). Teaching and student outcomes. A study on teachers’ thoughts and actions from an interpersonal and a learning activities perspective. Utrecht: W.C.C.

den Brok, L., Taconis, R., & Fisher, D. (2010). How well do science teachers do? Differences in teacher-student interpersonal behaviour between science teachers and teachers of other (school) subjects. Open Education Journal, 3, 44-53.

Bruckmüller, S., & Abele, A. E. (2013). The density of the big two: How are agency and communion structurally represented? Social Psychology, 44(2), 63-74.

Dermody, S., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Durbin, C. E., & Wright, A. G. C. (2017). Modeling the complexity of dynamic, momentary interpersonal behavior: Applying the time-varying effect model to test predictions from interpersonal theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 54–62.

Fisher, D. L., Henderson, D., & Fraser, B. J. (1995). Interpersonal behavior in senior high school biology classes. Research in Science Education, 25, 125–133.

Ghafarpour, H., & Moinzadeh, A. (2019). A dynamic systems analysis of classrooms: teacher experience and student motivation. Learning Environments Research, 23, 101–116.

Ghafarpour, H., Moinzadeh, A., & Eslami Rasekh, A. (2018). I Am Good at It Because I Like Its Teacher: To what Extent Does Teacher Behavior Motivate Students to Learn? Teaching English Language, 12 (2); pp. 67-87.

Hollenstein, T. (2013). State space grids: Depicting dynamics across development. New York: Springer.

Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.

Lamey, A., Hollenstein, T., Lewis, M. D., & Granic, I. (2004). GridWare (Version 1.1). [Computer software].

Lewis, M. D., Lamey, A. V., & Douglas, L. (1999). A new dynamic systems method for the analysis of early socioemotional development. Developmental Science, 2, 457-475.

Lizdek, I., Sadler, P., Woody, E., Ethier, N., & Malet, G. (2012). Capturing the stream of behavior: A computer joystick method for coding interpersonal behavior continuously over time. Social Science Computer Review, 30(4), 513-521.

Mainhard, M. T., Pennings, H. J. M., Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2012) Mapping agency and communion in teacher-student interaction with state space grids. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 1027–1037.

Markey, P. M., Lowmaster, S. E., & Eichler, W. C. (2010). A real-time assessment of interpersonal complementarity. Personal Relationships, 17, 13–25.

Maulanaa, R., Opdenakker, M. C., den Brok, P., & Bosker, R. (2011). Teacher–student interpersonal relationships in Indonesia: profiles and importance to student motivation. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 31(1), 33–49.

Nugent, T. (2009). The impact of teacher-student interaction on student motivation and achievement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Central Florida, USA.

O’Connor, E. (2010). Teacher-student relationships as dynamic systems. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 187–218.

Passini, S., Molinari, L., & Speltini, G. (2015). A validation of the questionnaire on teacher interaction in Italian secondary school students: the effect of positive relations on motivation and academic achievement. Social psychological education, 18, 547–559.

Pennings, H. J. M. (2017a). Interpersonal dynamics in teacher-student interactions and relationships. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Pennings, H. J. M. (2017b). Using a complexity approach to study the interpersonal dynamics in teacher-student interactions: A case study of two teachers. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 14, 88-103.

Pennings, H. J. M., Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T., van der Want, A. C., Claessens, L. C. A., & van Tartwijk, J. (2014). A nonlinear dynamical systems approach to real-time teacher behavior: differences between teachers. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 18(1), 23-45.

Pennings, H. J. M. & Hollenstein, T. (2019). Teacher-student interactions and teacher interpersonal styles: a state space grid analysis. The journal of experimental education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1578724.

Pennings, H. J. M., & Mainhard, T. (2016). Analyzing teacher–student interactions with state space grids. In Koopmans M, D. Stamovlasis (Eds) Complex dynamical systems in education: concepts, methods and applications. Switzerland: Springer international publishing, 233-271.

Pennings, H. J. M., van Tartwijk, J., Wubbels, T., Claessens, L. C. A., van der Want, A. C., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). Real-time teacher-student interactions: A dynamic systems approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 183-193.

Pianta, R. C. (2016). Teacher-student interactions: Measurement, impacts, improvement, and policy. Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences, 3(1), 98-105.

Roorda, D. L. (2012). Teacher-child relationships and interaction processes: Effects on students’ learning behaviors and reciprocal influences between teacher and child (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Sadler, P., Ethier, N., Gunn, G. R., Duong, D., & Woody, E. (2009). Are we on the same wavelength? Interpersonal complementarity as shared cyclical patterns during interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1005-1020.

Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., & Thij, J. T. (2011). Teacher wellbeing: the importance of teacher student relationship. Educational psychology review, 23(4), 457-477.

Steenbeek, H., & van Geert, P. (2013). The emergence of learning teaching trajectories in education: a complex dynamic systems approach. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 17(2), 233-267.

Tuckman, B. W. (1995). The interpersonal teacher model. The educational forum, 59.

Urhahne, D. (2015). Teacher behavior as a mediator of the relationship between teacher judgment and students' motivation and emotion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 73-82.

Wei, M., & Onsawad, A. (2007). English teachers’ actual and ideal interpersonal behavior and student’s outcome in secondary schools of Thailand. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 4(2), 95-121.

Wubbels, Th., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher-student relationships in class. Journal of Educational Research, 43, 6-24.

Wubbels, Th., Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2006). An interpersonal perspective on classroom management in secondary classrooms in the Netherlands. In Evertson C, C. Weinstein (Eds) Handbook of classroom management: Research practice and contemporary issues. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1161-1191.

Wubbels, Th., & Levy, J. (1991). A comparison of interpersonal behavior of Dutch and American teachers. International Journal of Intercultural Behavior, 15, 1-18.