آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 44 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,303 |
| تعداد مقالات | 16,020 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 52,485,577 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 15,213,084 |
Probing into EFL Teachers’ Assessment Literacy and Teaching Experience: The Case of Native ESL and Non-native EFL Teachers | ||
| Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
| مقاله 11، دوره 12، شماره 25، شهریور 2020، صفحه 269-288 اصل مقاله (531.46 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2020.10684 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Esmaeel Ali Salimi* 1؛ mitra farsi2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of English Language and Literature , Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Ph. D. Student of Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language and Literature, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The present study was an attempt to extend our knowledge on the perspectives of English language native and non-native teachers about assessment literacy. Furthermore, it was intended to find if there was any significant relationship between native and non-native English language teachers’ perceptions regarding assessment literacy and their experience. To achieve such goals, a mixed methods design was utilized. In the quantitative phase, Classroom Assessment Literacy Inventory developed by Campbell and Mertler (2004) was utilized which consisted of five scenarios. Through a combination of availability sampling and snowball sampling procedures, the researcher either distributed the questionnaire among 100 native and non-native English teachers or sent it by E-mail to them. In the qualitative phase, a semi-structured interview was selected as a qualitative tool for collecting data. To this end, 10 teachers volunteered to take part. Based on the quantitative findings, there was a positive relationship between native English language teachers’ perceptions regarding assessment literacy and their experience. However, there was not any significant relationship between non-native English language teachers’ perceptions regarding assessment literacy and their experience. Based on the qualitative results, seven codes were classified according to three themes, namely, assessment assumptions, assessment targets, and professional development. These seven codes were classroom observations, assessment consistency, formative assessments, summative assessment, higher-order thinking skills, lack of assessment literacy of coursework, and lack of technology assessment literacy. Thus, it is concluded that teachers should assume the role of classroom observation and consistency of the assessment as two major assumptions of assessment. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| assessment literacy؛ native teachers؛ non- native teachers؛ teaching experience | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alkharusi, H. (2011). Teachers’ classroom assessment skills: Influence of gender, subject area, grade level, teaching experience, and in-service assessment training. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8(2), 39-48. Alsarimi, A. M. (2000). Classroom assessment and grading practices in the Sultanate of Oman. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Bol, L., Stephenson, P. L., O'connell, A. A., & Nunnery, J. A. (1998). Influence of experience, grade level, and subject area on teachers' assessment practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(6), 323-330. Campbell, C., & Mertler, C. (2004). Assessment literacy inventory. New York: Measurement Instruments Press. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Davidheiser, S. A. (2013). Identifying areas for high school teacher development: A study of assessment literacy in the Central Bucks School District. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Drexel University. DeLuca, C., & Klinger, D. A. (2010). Assessment literacy development: Identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 419-438. Hailaya, W. M. (2014). Teacher assessment literacy and student outcomes in the province of Tawi- Tawi, Philippines (Doctoral dissertation). University of Adelaide, Australia. Hopkins, D. (1985). A teacher's guide to classroom research. Philadelphia: Open. University Press. King, J. D. (2010). Criterion-referenced assessment literacy of educators. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS. MacBeath, F., & Galton, M. (2004). A life in secondary teaching: Finding time for learning. Accessed on May 2, 2016 from http://www.data.teachers.org.uk/resources/pdf/74626-MacBeath.pdf. Mertler, C. A. (1998). Classroom assessment practices of Ohio teachers. Paper presented at the meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Newfields, T. (2006). Teacher development and assessment literacy. In Authentic Communication: Proceedings of the 5th Annual JALT Pan-SIG Conference (pp. 48-73). Popham, W. J. (2004). All about accountability: Why assessment illiteracy is professional suicide. Educational Leadership, 62(1), 82-83. Stiggins, R. J. (1991). Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 534-539. Stiggins, R. J. (1995). Assessment literacy for the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappan, 238-245. Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. (2017). University English teacher assessment literacy: A survey-test report from China. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 6(1), 133-158. Zolfaghari, S., & Ashraf, H. (2015). The relationship between EFL teachers’ assessment literacy, their teaching experience, and their age: A case of Iranian EFL teachers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(12), 2550-2556. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 444 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 443 |
||