آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 32 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 755 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,373 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 10,071,296 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,482,682 |
عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد بالنگوی شهری(Lallemantia iberica Fisch. et Mey) در کشت مخلوط با انیسون(.Pimpinella anisum L) تحت آلودگی علف‌های‌هرز | ||
| دانش کشاورزی وتولید پایدار | ||
| مقاله 13، دوره 27، شماره 2، تابستان 1396، صفحه 183-195 اصل مقاله (817.22 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
مهدی ملک زاده  ؛ جلیل شفق کلوانق؛ سعید زهتاب سلماسی؛ صفر نصراله زاده؛ عادل دباغ محمدی نسب
| ||
| گروه اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهی، دانشکده‌‌ی کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز | ||
| چکیده | ||
| توجه به گیاهان دارویی در تأمین سلامت بشر و ایجاد تنوع در اکوسیستمهای کشاورزی و همچنین تأثیر این گیاهان روی کنترل علفهای هرز یک عامل مؤثر در طراحی سیستمهای کشاورزی مطلوب میباشد. در این راستا آزمایشی به‌منظور بررسی عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد بالنگوی شهری (قَرَهزَرک) در کشت مخلوط با انیسون در حضورعلفهای هرز انجام گرفت. این پژوهش در قالب آزمایش فاکتوریل بر پایه طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی اجرا گردید. فاکتور اول شامل کنترل علفهای هرز در دو سطح (عاری از علفهرز و آلوده به علفهرز) و فاکتور دوم شامل سه سطح کشت مخلوط افزایشی جزئی در جهت بالنگوی شهری با نسبت‌های ٢۰ درصد بالنگوی شهری و تراکم مطلوب انیسون، ۴۰ درصد بالنگوی شهری و تراکم مطلوب انیسون و ۶۰ درصد بالنگوی شهری و تراکم مطلوب انیسون و دو سطح کشت خالص بالنگوی شهری و انیسون در نظرگرفته شد. نتایج آزمایش نشان داد که اثر الگویکشت بر وزن خشک علفهای هرز در سطح احتمال 5 درصد معنیدار بود. همچنین ترکیب تیماری کشت مخلوط 100:20 (بالنگویشهری – انیسون) و عاری از علفهرز مناسبترین ترکیب تیماری بود. بیشترین عملکرد دانه نیز در ترکیب تیماری کشت خالص عاری از علفهرز بدست آمد. کلیه تیمارهای کشت‌مخلوط، LER وRVT بالاتری نسبت به کشت‌خالص هردو گونه داشتند. لازم به ذکر است که بالنگویشهری حتی با وجود آلوده بودن به علفهرز توانسته عملکردی قابل توجه از نظر اقتصادی تولید کند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| الگوی کاشت؛ انیسون؛ بالنگوی شهری (قَرَه زَرک)؛ کشت مخلوط؛ علفهرز | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Yield and Yield Components of Lallemantia (Lallemantia iberica Fisch. et Mey) intercropped with Anise (Pimpinella anisum L.) under Weed Infestation | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mehdi Malekzadeh؛ Jalil Shafagh-Kalvanagh؛ Saeed zehtab Salmasi؛ Safar Nasrollahzadeh؛ Adel Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Medicinal plants are used for human health and creating diversity in agricultural ecosystems and have impact on the weed control. In this context, an experiment in order to evaluate the yield and yield components of lallemantia in intercropping with anise was carried out. The research was conducted as factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design. The first factor was weed control (Free of weeds and weed infested) and the second factor included three levels of intercropping as slight increase in the direction lallemantia with ratios of 20% lallemantia and anise favorable density ,40% lallemantia and anise favorable density and 60% lallemantia and anise favorable density and monocropping of both species. The results showed that planting pattern effect on weed dry weight was significant at the 5% level. Also intercropping 20: 100 (lallemantia – anise) and Free of the weed was the most suitable treatment. The highest grain yield in monocropping under weed Free condition was obtained. In all intercropping, LER and RVT were higher than both monocropping. It should be noted that the lallemantia even with weedy condition could produce yield economically. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Anise, Intercropping, Lallemantia, Planting Pattern, Weed | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alizadeh Y, Koocheki A and Nasiri Mahallati M, 2010. Investigating of growth characteristics, yield, yield components and potential weed control in intercropping of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and vegetative sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Journal of Agroecology, 2(3): 541-553. (In Persian).
Aghaei-Gharachorlou P, Nasrollahzadeh S and Shafag-Kolvanagh J, 2013. Effect of different irrigation treatments and plant density on yield and yield components of Dragon’s head (Lallemantia iberica Fish. et Mey). International Journal of Biosciences, 8: 144 – 149.
Aghaei-Gharachorlou P, Nasrollahzadeh S and Shafag-Kolvanagh J, 2014. Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and its components in Dragon’s head (Lallemantia iberica Fish. et Mey). Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences, 4: 157-163.
Arslan N, Gurbuz B and Sarihan EO, 2004.Variation in essential oil content and composition inTurkish anise (Pimpinella anisum L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture, 28: 173-177.
Atesh DA and Erdogrul OT, 2003. Antimicrobial activities of various medicinal andcommercial plant extracts. Turkish Journal of Biology, 27: 157-162.
Aynehchi Y, 1991. Medicinal Plants and Materia Medica. Tehran University Press, 1069 P. (In Persian).
Amin GR, 2005. Popular Medicinal Plants of Iran. Publications of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran. 66-67 p. (In Persian).
Baumann DT, Kropff MJ and Bastiaans L, 2000. Intercropping leeks to suppress weeds. Weed Research, 40: 359-374.
Bismillah khan M and Khaliq A, 2004. Study of mungbean intercripping in cotton planted with different theqniques. Journal of Research, Bahuaddin Zakanya University, Multan, Pakistan, 15: 23-31.
Bown D, 1995. The royal horticultural society encyclopedia of herbs and their uses. Dorling Kindersley Ltd. London, Pp. 424.
Carrubba A, Torre R, Saiano F and Aiello P, 2008. Sustainable production of fennel and dill by intercropping.Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 28: 247-256.
Delazar A, Biglari F, Esnaashari S, Nazemiyeh H, Talebpour AH, Nahar L and Sarker SD, 2006.GC–MS analysis of the essential oils and theisolation of phenylpropanoid derivatives from the aerial parts ofPimpinella aurea. Phytochemistry, 67: 2176-2187.
Darzi MT, Ghalavand A, Rejali F, Sephidkon F, 2007. Effects of Biofertilizers Application on yield and yield components in fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 22(4): 276-292. (In Persian).
Eshgizadeh HR, Chaichi MR, Ghalavand A, Shabani G, Azizi Kh, Tourknejad A, Raeisi Yazdi H and Papizadeh A, 2007. Evaluation of annual medic and barley intercropping on forage yield and protein content in dry farming system. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, 75: 102-112. (In Persian).
Ghahreman A, 1978. Color full Flora of Iran, Environmental Protection Organization ,and Research Institute Forestes and Rangelands Press,Tehran. (In Persian).
Haymes R and Lee HC, 1999. Competition berween autumn and spring planted grain intercrops of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and field bean (Vicia faba). Field Crop Research, 62: 167-176.
Hamzei J, Seyedi M, Ahmadvand G and Abutalebian MA, 2012. The effect of additive intercropping on weed suppression, yield and yield component of chickpea and barley. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 2(3): 43-56. (In Persian).
Hemayati S, Siadat A and Sadeghzade F, 2002. Evaluation of intercropping of two corn hybrids SC704and SC711 in different densities, Iranian. Journal of Agricultural Science, 25: 73-87. (In Persian).
Javanshir A, Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab A, Hamidi A and Gholipour M, 2000. Ecology of intercropping. Publications Mashhad University Jihad, 217 P. (In Persian).
Jahani Kondori M, Koocheki A and Nassiri Mahallati M, 2008. Comparison of different intercropping arrangements of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) and lentil (Lens culinaris). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 6(1): 67-78. (In Persian).
Kazmi A, Clark H, James A and Kraus G, 2011. Advanced oil croBiorefineries (RSC Green Chemistry). Royal Society of Chemistry(Nov 25, 2011). RSC Publishing.
Koocheki A and Zand A, 1996. Agriculture from the perspective of Ecology (Translation). Press SID, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (In Persian).
Liebman M and Davis AS, 2000. Integration of siol, crop and weed management in Low- input farming systems. Weed Research, 40: 27-47.
Mazaheri D, Parsio B and Peighombari SA, 2001. Study of growth analysis in monoculture and intercroppingof soybean. Journal of Research and Construction 54:37-54.
Morton JF, 1990. Mucilaginous plants and their uses in medicine. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 29: 245-266.
Maffei M and Mucciarelli M, 2003. Essential oil yield in peppermint soybean strip intercropping. Field Crops Research, 48: 229-240.
Mandal BK, Dhara MC, Mandal BB, Das SK and Nandy R, 1990. Rice, mung bean, soybean andblackgram yield under different intercropping systems. Agronomy Journal, 82: 1063- 1066.
Madani H, Shirzadi MH and Doreyni F, 2008. Effect of plant density on yield and yield components in black-eyed bean and Tapari local bean of Jiroft county. Journal Agriculture. Modern Finding, 3(1): 93-104. (In Persian).
Movahedi Dehnavi M, 1999. Corn and bean intercropping and its effects on weed control. M. Sc. thesis, University of Tehran, Iran. (In Persian).
Nielsen HH, Ambus P and Jensen ES, 2001. Interspecific competition N use and interference with weeds in pea – barley intercropping. FieldCrops Research, 70: 101-109.
Naghibi F, Mosaddegh M, Motamed SM and Ghorbani A, 2005. Labiatae family infolk medicine in Iran: from ethnobotany to pharmacology. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2: 63-79. (In Persian).
Pandita AK, Saha MH and Bali AS, 2000. Effect of row ratio in cereal-legume intercropping systems onproductivity and competition functions under Kashmir conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 45: 48-53.
Rahimi MM, Mazaheri D, Khodabandeh N and Heidari Sharif Abad A, 2002. Study of yield and yield components in corn and soybean intercropping. Pajouhesh-va-Sazandegi, 55: 45-51. (In Persian).
Rostami L, Mondani F, Khuramdel S, Koocheki A and Nassiri Mahallati M, 2009. Effect of various corn and bean intercropping densities on weed populations. Weed Research Journal, 1(2): 37-51. (In Persian).
Rezvani Moghadam P, Raoofi MR, Rashed Mohassel MH and Moradi R, 2009. Evaluation of sowing patterns and weed control on mung bean (Vigna radiate L.Wilczek)-black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) intercropping system. Journal of Agroecology, 1(1): 65-79. (In Persian).
Singh SP, Rao GP and Upadhayaya PP, 1998. Fungitoxicity of essential oils of some aromatic plants against sugarcane pathogens. SugarCane, 2: 14 – 17.
Seyedi M, Hamzei J, Ahmadvand G and Abutalebian MA, 2012. Possible replacement intercropping of chickpea and barley in Hamedan, with an emphasis on grain yield and weed control. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 12: 35 – 42. (In Persian).
Shaygan M, Mazaheri D, Rahimian Mashhadi H and Peyghambari SA, 2008. Effect of planting date and intercropping maize (Zea mays L.) and foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) on their grain yield and weeds control. Journal of Crop Science, 10: 31- 46. (In Persian).
Shafagh-Kolvanagh J, 2008. Eco physiologic Effects of various Nitrogen Amounts on Critical Periods of Weed Interference and Qualitative and Quantitative Yield of Soy Bean. PhD Thesis in Agronomy. Agricultural Department, Tabriz University. (In Persian).
Tobita S, Ito O, Matsunaga R, Rao TP, Rego TJ, Johansen C andYoneyama NS, 1994. Field evaluation of nitrogen fixation and use of nitrogen fertilizer by sorghum/pigeon pea intercropping on an Alfisol in the Indian semi-arid tropics. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 17: 241-248.
Ursu B and Borcean I, 2012. Researches concerning the sowing technology at Lallemantia iberica F. & C. M., University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of the Banat Timisoara, Research Journal of Agricultural Science, 44: 168-171. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 429 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 581 |
||
