تلفیق عاطفه و عقلانیت و کاربست آن در تبیین وفاق اجتماعی

 

 

Abdollahian, H. (2002). Rationality and reasoning: A dialogue between generations, women, and men. Women’s Research Quarterly, 3. Spring. [In Persian]

Aghajani, N., Eslami Tanha, A., & Mohammadi, M. (2019). Social action rationality from the perspective of Islamic wisdom in confrontation with Weber’s tradition. Islam and Social Studies, 7(1), 25. Summer. [In Persian]

Ahmadvand, D. (2024). Critique of epistemology on logical reasoning and rationality in organization and management. Humanities Development, 5(9), Spring and Summer. [In Persian]

Arab Pour, E., & Mehdi Zadeh, Sh. (2020). Meta-analysis of studies on social order and cohesion in Iran. Contemporary Sociological Research, 9(71), Autumn and Winter. [In Persian]

Azad Armaki, T. (1996). Sociology of rationality. Scientific Quarterly in the Field of Philosophy of Religion and New Theology, 1(1), 1. [In Persian]

Bagheri, Sh., & Nazarian, R. (2017). The contributions of Muslim sociologists in clarifying the dualism of structure and agency. Fundamental Research in Humanities, 10. Spring. [In Persian]

Beshteh Naz, M. (2022). Critique of Anthony Giddens’ cultural theory. Scientific Journal of Political Research in Human Sciences, 1(1), 1. Spring. [In Persian]

Beyaan, M., Shapur, & Hashemianfar, S. A. (2022). Journal of Social-Cultural Development Studies, 11(1), 1401 Summer. [In Persian]

Collins, R. (1975). Conflict sociology: Towards an explanatory science. New York: Academic Press.

Danayi Fard, H. (2007). Competing paradigms in organization science: An applied approach to ontology, epistemology, and methodology. Behavioral Knowledge, 14(26). [In Persian]

Fazeli, N. (2018). Formulating the issue of emotions in Iran: A theory on the dynamics of emotional patterns in Iran. Cultural and Communication Studies, 19(33), Autumn. [In Persian]

Fooladian, M., & Jalai Pour, M. (2016). Comparing hegemonic and charismatic domination based on Weber’s views: Clarifying a conceptual line. Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities, 8(3), Summer. [In Persian]

Ghaeni, A. (2012). The three paradigms of positivism, interpretation, and hermeneutics in organization and management studies. Cultural Strategy, 19. Autumn. [In Persian]

Ghaffari, M., & Sadeghpour, M. (2023). The blend of emotion and borrowing in the macro-value management of society: A case study of discourse formation mechanisms of the Revolution Leader regarding the martyrdom of Qassem Soleimani. Scientific Political Knowledge Journal, Special Issue 1 on Resistance. [In Persian]

Ghahramani, M. A., & Abdollahi, B. (2013). Examining the relationship between ontology and epistemology of interpretive, critical, and scientific paradigms with the methodology and methods used in this paradigm. Research Journal, 4(1), 7. Spring and Summer. [In Persian]

Ghanimati, H., Mansouri, F., & Dadandish, P. (2020). Social cohesion and its relationship with normative dispersion. Social Issues in Iran, 11(2), Autumn and Winter. [In Persian]

Ghodrati, A., & colleagues. (2018). Identifying social and cultural components affecting commitment to social order in Tehran. Sociological Studies, 25(1), Spring and Summer. [In Persian]

Giddens, A. (2004). Modernity and self-identity (N. Mofaqian, Trans.). Tehran: Nashr-e-Ni. [In Persian]

Habermas, J. (2013). The theory of communicative action: Reason and rationality in society, lifeworld, and the critique of the functionalists’ concept of reason (K. Poladi, Trans.). Tehran: Markaz Publications, 1st ed., 2nd revision. [In Persian]

Hajiani, E. (2011). Indicators of solidarity and the impact of Islamic freedom on it. National Studies, Special Issue, 1. [In Persian]

Heidari, A., & colleagues. (2012). The theory of symbolic disintegration and legislation: A case study of Shahid Chamran University students in Ahvaz. Social Issues in Iran, 3(2). [In Persian]

Hosseinzadeh, M. (2007). Rationality from the perspective of epistemology. Philosophical Knowledge, 4(4), Summer. [In Persian]

Iman, M. T. (2009). Paradigmatic foundations of quantitative and qualitative research methods in humanities. Qom: Research Institute of the Seminary and University. [In Persian]

Iman, Z. (2022). Anthony Giddens’ structuration theory and its role in determining the accountability model in the accounting system. Scientific-Research Journal of Accounting and Management, 8(30), Summer. [In Persian]

Jahani Nasab, A. (2022). Examination of the concept of social solidarity in the thoughts of Ibn Khaldun and Émile Durkheim. Scientific-Research Journal of Social Theories of Muslim Thinkers, 12(1). Spring. [In Persian]

Javadi Yeganeh, M. R. (2008). A sociological approach to rational choice theory. Cultural Strategy, 3. Autumn. [In Persian]

Kraib, J. (1999). Modern theories in sociology (M. Mohajer, Trans.). Tehran: Soroush. [In Persian]

Kuzer, L. (1994). The life and thoughts of great sociologists (M. Salathi, Trans.). Tehran: Scientific Publications. [In Persian]

Lawler, E. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 321-335.

Lawler, E. J. (2002). Micro social orders. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65(1), 4-17.

Mahdavi, S. M. S., & Sharifi, M. (2019). Reflection on the paradigmatic differences between quantitative and qualitative methods in social sciences. Humanities Research Journal, 53. Spring. [In Persian]

Maqsoudi, M. (2018). Assessing the collective identity of Iranians with an emphasis on social cohesion. National Studies, 19(3). [In Persian]

Masoudnia, H., & Shafiei Yingabadi, N. (2024). Social consensus in Iran: Challenges and solutions. Political Journal, 54(4), Winter. [In Persian]

Mohammadi, A., & colleagues. (2022). Proposing a model of social action based on Parsons’ AGIL framework in Iran’s engineering system. Strategy, 11(44). Autumn. [In Persian]

Mohammadi, M. (2007). Religion and ethics in Durkheim’s communitarianism and its critique. Religious Thought Quarterly, Shiraz University, 25. [In Persian]

Mohammadi, M. (2022). The relationship between emotion and the rational component of the self from Aristotle’s perspective. Scientific Journal of Wisdom and Philosophy, 18(96), Spring. [In Persian]

Moqaddas, A. A., & Ghodrati, H. (2004). Anthony Giddens’ structuration theory and its methodological foundations. Social Science Journal of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 1(4), Spring. [In Persian]

Moqaddas, A. A., & Ghodrati, Sh. (2011). A critical examination of Jonathan Turner’s, Theodore Kemper’s, and Edward Lawler’s sociological theories of emotions. Applied Sociology, 22(42), 2. Summer. [In Persian]

Motavaseli, F. (2019). Talcott Parsons’ theory of social order and its correlation with order in the managerial conduct of the Prophet Muhammad. International Journal of Nations Research, 4(43). Summer. [In Persian]

Naeibi, H., & colleagues. (2017). Durkheim’s and Merton’s theory of anomie: Similarities, differences, and measurement methods. Scientific-Research Journal of Social Welfare, 17(66), Autumn. [In Persian]

Naghdi, A., & Kamarbigi, K. (2010). A study of social consensus in urban, rural, and tribal communities of Ilam. 4(2), Tir. [In Persian]

Najafi, K., & Farahmand, M. (1989). An examination of the factors affecting social consensus among the Lur and Lak tribes (case study: Mazdan city, Khorramabad). Journal of Social Development, 13(4). Summer. [In Persian]

Nozari, H. A. (2002). Revisiting Habermas. Cheshmeh, Tehran. [In Persian]

Parsons, T., & Robert, B. (1995). Family, socialization and interaction process. New York: The Free Press.

Rabani Khorasgani, A., & Kianpour, M. (2009). Sociology of emotions. Applied Sociology, 20(34), 2. Summer. [In Persian]

Reza Doost, K. (2023). Socio-cultural factors affecting social consensus in Dehdasht city. Journal of National Security Studies, 61, 16(1). [In Persian]

Ritzer, G. (2003). Sociological theories in the contemporary era (M. Salathi, Trans.). Tehran: Scientific Publications. [In Persian]

Ritzer, G. (2014). Sociological theory (1st ed., H. Naeibi, Trans.). Tehran: Nashr-e-Ni. [In Persian]

Sadeghi Fasaei, S., Naseri Rad, M. (2011). Fundamental elements of qualitative research in social sciences: Ontology, epistemology, methodology, and methods. Iranian Social Studies, 5(2), Summer. [In Persian]

Safari, H., & Tofigh, E. (2009). A critical examination of the impact of deviant forms on the intensity of mechanical solidarity in the modern era based on Durkheim’s theory: A case study of Tehran. Iranian Sociology, 10(1), Spring. [In Persian]

Salehi Amiri, S. R. (2009). Cohesion and cultural diversity. Tehran: Research Institute of Strategic Studies. [In Persian]

Satari, A., Yazdani, F., & Farazi, A. (2017). Examining Habermas’s communicative action theory and its implications in higher education in Iran. Educational Sciences Journal of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, 6(24), Spring and Summer. [In Persian]

Shafiei, M. (2005). The theory of communicative action (lifeworld and system) and social and political critique. Political Knowledge Quarterly, 2. Autumn and Winter. [In Persian]

Thamm, R. A. (2006). The classification of emotion. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 1-15). New York: Springer Science.

Tohidfam, M., & Hosseinian Amiri, M. (2009). The integration of agency and structure in the ideas of Giddens, Bourdieu, and Habermas and its impact on contemporary sociology. Political Science Journal, 4(3), Summer. [In Persian]

Turner, J. H. (2006). Psychoanalytic sociological theories and emotion. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 164-178). New York: Springer Science.

Vajdani, F. (2012). Explaining the internal relationship between rationality and emotion and its implications for nurturing creative thinking in higher education. Higher Education Letter, 5(19), Autumn. [In Persian]

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Zaki, M. A. (2016). Social cohesion, students, and universities in Iran. Iranian Social Studies, 10(4), Winter. [In Persian]