الف) منابع فارسی
- مقالات
- الشریف، محمدمهدی و جعفری خـسروآبادی، نصرالله (1390). حقیقـت امانـت. مدرسۀ حقوق، )67(، 12-28.
- جنیدی، لعیا، و اکبریان طبری، معصومه (1397). رابطة امانی مدیران در شرکت‌های سهامی: بررسی تطبیقی در حقوق ایران و انگلستان. حقوق تطبیقی، 5(2)، 69-96.
Doi: 10.22096/law.2019.34499
- جنیدی، لعیا و نوروزی، محمد (1389). شناخت دارندگان اطلاعات نهانی شرکت‌های سهامی عام. مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، 40 (101)، 51-69.
- حاجی‌نوری، غلامرضا (1395). بازگشت اعتدال به نظریۀ سوء استفاده از حق. مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی معاصر، 6 (11)، 143-166.
- سربازیان، مجید و رنجبری، سهیلا (1394). مفهوم مالکیت و زمان انتقال آن در فقه امامیه، حقوق ایران و انگلیس. پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب، 2 (1)، 57-80.
Doi: 10.22091/csiw.2015.1021
- محقق داماد، سید مصطفی و درویش‌زاده، محمد (1400). حقوق را جدی بگیریم (جای خالی قانون «مدیریت تعارض منافع» در انتخابات ریاست جمهوری سیزدهم). تحقیق و توسعه در حقوق تطبیقی، 4 (10)، 130-158. Doi: 10.22034/law.2021.532467.1085
- ویژه، محمدرضا (1388). نگرشی تطبیقی بر مالکیت در فقه اسلامی و حقوق غرب، پژوهش‌های حقوقی، 8 (15)، 205-227.
- قوانین
- «آیین‌نامۀ احراز صلاحیت‌های مدیران عامل و اعضای هیات مدیره، هیات عامل و افرادی که به نمایندگی صاحب سهم دولت در شرکت‌ها و یا سایر اشخاص حقوقی مربوط به عنوان عضو هیات مدیره معرفی می‌شوند»، مصوب 1400.
- «دستورالعمل اجرایی نحوه گزارش‌دهی دارندگان اطلاعات نهانی»، مصوب 1386.
- «دستورالعمل الزامات افشای اطلاعات و تصویب معاملات اشخاص وابسته ناشران بورسی و فرابورسی»، مصوب 1390.
- «دستورالعمل حاکمیت شرکتی شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران و فرابورس ایران»، مصوب 1401.
- طرح «مدیریت تعارض منافع».
- «قانون بازار اوراق بهادار جمهوری اسلامی ایران»، مصوب 1384.
- «قانون تجارت و لایحۀ قانونی اصلاح قسمتی از قانون تجارت»، مصوب 1347.
- لایحۀ «نحوۀ مدیریت تعارض منافع در انجام وظایف قانونی و ارائه خدمات عمومی»، مصوب 1396.
ب) منابع انگلیسی
- Books
- Clark, R. (1986). Corporate Law, Boston: Little, Brown.
- Davies, P. & Worthington, S. (2021). Gower: Principles of Modern Company Law, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
- Frankel, T.T. (2011). Fiduciary Law, NewYork: Oxford University Press.
- Keay, A. (2016). Directors’ Duties, Boston: Jordan Publishing Limited.
- Mortimore, S. (2017). Company Directors: Duties, Liabilities and Remedies, London: Oxford University Press.
- Watts, P. (2015). Directors Powers and Duties, New Zealand: LexisNexis NZ Limited.
- Articles
- Armour, J. & Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. (2009). Agency Problems, Legal Strategies and Enforcement Discussion, Harvard Law School Cambridge, (644), 1-23.
- Bainbridge, S.M. (2008). Rethinking Delaware’s Corporate Opportunity Doctrine, UCLA School of Law, Law & Economics Research, 17 (8), 1-16.
- Black, L.S. (2007). Why Corporations Choose Delaware, Delaware Department of State Division of Corporations.
- Brudney, V. (1997). Contract and Fiduciary Duty in Corporate Law, Boston College Law Review, 38 (4), 595-665.
- Brudney, & Clark, R., (1981). A New Look at Corporate Opportunities, Harvard Law Review,94 (5), 997-1062
- Bruner, Ch. M. (2010). Good Faith in Revlon-Land, Washington and Lee University School of Law, (55).581-591.
- Conaglen, M. (2005). The Nature and Function of Fiduciary Loyalty, Law Quarterly Review, (121), 452-474.
- Prentice, D. (1974). The Corporate Opportunity Doctrine, The Modern Law Review, 37(4), 464-468.
- Farrar, J.H. & Watson, S., (2011). Self-Dealing, Fair Dealing and Related Party Transactions–History, Policy and Reform, Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 11 (2), 495-523.
- Gormley, T.A. & Matsa, D.A. (2016). Playing it Safe? Managerial Preferences, Risk, and Agency Conflicts, Journal of Financial Economics,122 (3), 431-455.
- Grossman, N. (2007). Director Compliance with Elusive Fiduciary Duties in a Climate of Corporate Governance Reform, Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 12 (3), 393-466.
- Hadjinestoros, M. (2008). Exploitation of Business Opportunities: How the UK Courts Ensure that Directors Remain Loyal to Their Companies, International Company and Commercial Law Review, 19 (2). 70-98.
- Hannigan, B. (2011). Reconfiguring the No Conflict Rule: Judicial Strictures, a Statutory Restatement and Opportunistic Director, Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 23 (4), 714-744.
- Hart III, J. R. (2009). Storetrax.com, Inc. v. Gurland: Keep Trax of Your Board of Directors, Maryland Law Review Online, 68 (6), 26-38.
- Horton, B.J., (2016). Modifying Fiduciary Duties in Delaware: Observing Ten Years of Decisional Law, Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 40 (3), 921-970.
- Nervig, J.E. (1977). Corporate Opportunity-Miller v. Miller-Proper Application of the Fairness Doctrine in the Corporate Opportunity Area, The Journal of Corporation Law, 2 (2), 405-432.
- Johnston, J.F. (2005). Natural Law and the Fiduciary Duties of Business Managers, Journal of Markets and Morality, 8 (1), 27-51.
- Kershaw, D. (2005). Does it Matter How the Law Thinks About Corporate Opportunities?, Legal Studies, 25 (94), 533-558.
- Lawrence, E. M. (1993). Fairness and Trust in Corporate Law, Duke University School of Law, 43 (3), 425-491.
- Li, J. (2011). the Peso Silver Case: An Opportunity to Soften the Rigid Approach of the English Courts on the Problem of Corporate Opportunity, Company law, 32 (3), 53-75.
- Lim, E. (2013). Directors’ fiduciary duties: a new analytical framework, Law Quarterly Review, 129 (4), 242-263.
- Lowry, J. (2012). Codifying the Corporate Opportunity Doctrine: The (UK) Companies Act 2006, International Review of Law, 5(1), 1-17.
- Lowry, J. & Edmunds, R. (2002). The no Conflict-no Profit Rules and the Corporate Fiduciary: Challenging the Orthodoxy of Absolutism, Journal of Business Law, 122-142.
- Lowry, Jone & Edmunds, (1998). The Corporate Opportunity Doctrine: The Shifting Boundaries of the Duty and its Remedies, The Modern Law Review, 61 (4), 515-537.
- Macneil, I.R. (1978). Contracts: Adjustment of Long-Term Economic Relations Under the Classical, Neoclassical, and Relational Contract Law, Northwestern Law Review, (72), 854-905.
- M. & Helleringer, G. (2018). Opportunity Makes a Thief: Corporate Opportunities as Legal Transplant and Convergence in Corporate Law, Berkeley Business Law Journal, 15 (1), 92-153.
- Dickerson, R. & Vaughan, D.L. (2021). The Canada Business Corporations Act: Some Aspects of Transnational Interest, Vanderbilt Law Review, 8 (3), 795-814.
- Scott, S. (2003). The Corporate Opportunity Doctrine and Impossibility Arguments, Modern Law Review, 66 (6), 852-869.
- Churk, S.S. (2015). Just Abolish the No Profit Rule, International Company and Commercial Law Review, 26 (7), 244-251.
- Talley, E. (1998). Turning Servile Opportunities to Gold: A Strategic Analysis of the Corporate Opportunities Doctrine, The Yale Law Journal, (108), 277-375.
- Witney, S. (2016). Corporate Opportunity Law and the Non-Executive Director, Journal of Comparative Studies, 16 (1), 145-186.
- Worthington, S. (2013). Fiduciary Duties and Proprietary Remedies: Addressing the Failure of Equitable Formulae, The Cambridge Law Journal, 72 (3), 720-752.
- Cases
- The United States
- Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 812 (Del. 1984).
- Castleman ex rel. Thorpe v. CERBCO, Inc., 676 A.2d 436, 443 (Del. 1996).
- David J. Greene & Co. v. Dunhill Int’l, Inc., A.2d 427(Del. 1968).
- Durfee v. Durfee & Canning 80 N.E.2d 522, 529 (Mass. 1948).
- Fleigler v. Lawrence, 361 A.2d218, 221 (Del. 1976).
- Francis v. United Jersey Bank, 432 A.2d 814 (N.J. 1981).
- Guth v. Loft, 5 A.2d 503, 511 (Del. 1939).
- Johnston v. Greene 121 A.2d 919, 923 (Del. 1956).
- Lagarde v Anniston Lime & Stone Co., Ala, 28 So. 199 (1900).
- Lancaster Loose Leaf Tobacco Co. v. Robinson, 199 Ky. 313, 317-18, 250 S.W. 997, 998-99 (1923).
- Lynch v. Vickers Energy Corp., 383 A.2d 278, 279 (Del. 1977).
- Lyondell Chem. Co. v. Ryan, 970 A.2d 235, 240 (Del. 2009).
- Malone v. Brincat, 722 A.2d 5 (Del. 1998).
- Miller v. Miller, 222 N.W.2d 71, 81 (Minn. 1974).
- Northeast Harbor Golf Club, Inc. v. Harris (Me. 1995).
- Robert Broz and RFB Cellular Inc v. Cellular Information System Inc., 673 A.2d 148 (Del. 1996)
- Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litig., 906 A.2d 27, 67 (Del. 2006).
- Weismann v. Snyder, 338 Mass. 502,156 N.E.2d 21, 23 (1959).
- England
- Aberdeen Railway Company v. Blaikie Bros (1854) Macq 461.
- Bhullar v Bhullar [2003] EWCA Civ 424; [2003] 2 BCLC 241.
- Boardman v. Phipps [1966] 3 AII ER 721, [1967] 2 AC 46.
- Commonwealth Oil and Gas Company Limited v Baxter and another [2007] CSOH 198 para [188].
- Cook v. Deeks [1916] 1 AC (PC) 554.
- Crown Dilmun v. Sutton [2004] 1 BCLC 468.
- George Bray v. John Ford [1896] A.C. 44.
- Industrial Development Consultants Ltd v. Cooley [1972] 1 WLR 443.
- Keech v. Sandford [1726] 25 Eng. Rep. 223 (CA).
- O’Donnell v. Shanahan EWCA Civ 751; [2009] B.C.C. 822.
- Quarter Master UK Ltd v. Pyke [2004] EWHC 1815 (Ch).
- Rafield v. Brotman, 690 N.Y.S.2d 263, 265 (1999).
- Regal (Hastings) Ltd. v. Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134, [159] (HL).
- Thermascan Limited v. Norman [2009] EWHC 3694 (Ch).
- Towers v. Premier Waste Management Ltd [2012] BCC 72.
- Wilkinson v. West Coast [2005] EWHC 3009 [2007] BCC 717(Ch).
|
