- Andoni, M., Robu, V., Couraud, B., Früh, W. G., Norbu, S., & Flynn, D. (2021). Analysis of strategic renewable energy, grid and storage capacity investments via Stackelberg-cournot modelling. IEEE Access, 9, 37752-37771.
- Ansari, D., & Holz, F. (2019). Anticipating global energy, climate and policy in 2055: Constructing qualitative and quantitative narratives. Energy Research & Social Science, 58, 101250.
- Basiri, R., Abedian, M., Aghasi, S., & Dashtaali, Z. (2024). A dynamic analysis of the firms in oligopoly market structure: a case study. Journal of Modelling in Management.
- Baltensperger, T., Füchslin, R. M., Krütli, P., & Lygeros, J. (2016). Multiplicity of equilibria in conjectural variations models of natural gas markets. European Journal of Operational Research, 252(2), 646-656.
- Bischi, G. I., Baiardi, L. C., Lamantia, F., & Radi, D. (2024). Nonlinear dynamics and game-theoretic modeling in economics and finance. Annals of Operations Research, 337(3), 731-737.
- Bushnell, J. B., Mansur, E. T., & Saravia, C. (2008). Vertical arrangements, market structure, and competition: An analysis of restructured US electricity markets. American Economic Review, 98(1), 237-266.
- Conejo, A. J., Contreras, J., Arroyo, J. M., & De la Torre, S. (2002). Optimal response of an oligopolistic generating company to a competitive pool-based electric power market. IEEE transactions on power systems, 17(2), 424-430.
- Devine, M. T., & Bertsch, V. (2018). Examining the benefits of load shedding strategies using a rolling-horizon stochastic mixed complementarity equilibrium model. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(2), 643-658.
- Devine, M. T., & Bertsch, V. (2023). The role of demand response in mitigating market power: a quantitative analysis using a stochastic market equilibrium model. OR Spectrum, 45(2), 555-597.
- Devine, M. T., Nolan, S., Lynch, M. Á., & O’Malley, M. (2019). The effect of demand response and wind generation on electricity investment and operation. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 17, 100190.
- Egging-Bratseth, R., Baltensperger, T., & Tomasgard, A. (2020). Solving oligopolistic equilibrium problems with convex optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 284(1), 44-52.
- Facchinei, F. (2003). Finite-dimensional variational inequalities and complementarity problems.
- Fanzeres, B., Street, A., & Pozo, D. (2020). A column-and-constraint generation algorithm to find Nash equilibrium in pool-based electricity markets. Electric power systems research, 189, 106806.
- Gabriel, S. A., Zhuang, J., & Egging, R. (2009). Solving stochastic complementarity problems in energy market modeling using scenario reduction. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(3), 1028-1040.
- Li, L., Chen, J., & Raghunathan, S. (2018). Recommender system rethink: Implications for an electronic marketplace with competing manufacturers. Information Systems Research, 29(4), 1003-1023.
- Habibian, M., Downward, A., & Zakeri, G. (2020). Multistage stochastic demand-side management for price-making major consumers of electricity in a co-optimized energy and reserve market. European Journal of Operational Research, 280(2), 671-688.
- Hu, X., & Ralph, D. (2007). Using EPECs to model bilevel games in restructured electricity markets with locational prices. Operations research, 55(5), 809-827.
- Hommes, C. H., Ochea, M. I., & Tuinstra, J. (2018). Evolutionary competition between adjustment processes in cournot oligopoly: instability and complex dynamics. Dynamic Games and Applications, 8, 822-843.
- Huang, Q., Xu, Y., & Courcoubetis, C. (2020). Stackelberg competition between merchant and regulated storage investment in wholesale electricity markets. Applied Energy, 264, 114669.
- Huang, S., Wu, Y., Zhao, Z., Wu, B., Sun, K., Wang, H., ... & Tang, W. (2021). A new mechanism of obeticholic acid on NASH treatment by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation in macrophage. Metabolism, 120, 154797.
- Huang, Q., Xu, Y., & Courcoubetis, C. (2020). Stackelberg competition between merchant and regulated storage investment in wholesale electricity markets. Applied Energy, 264, 114669.
- Huppmann, D. (2013). Endogenous shifts in OPEC market power: A Stackelberg oligopoly with fringe.
- Kimbrough, S. O., Murphy, F., & Smeers, Y. (2014). Extending Cournot: When does insight dissipate?. Fox School of Business Research Paper, (14-036).
- Pozo, D., & Contreras, J. (2011). Finding multiple nash equilibria in pool-based markets: A stochastic EPEC approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 26(3), 1744-1752.
- Pozo, D., Sauma, E., & Contreras, J. (2017). Basic theoretical foundations and insights on bilevel models and their applications to power systems. Annals of Operations Research, 254, 303-334.
- Ruiz, C., & Conejo, A. J. (2009). Pool strategy of a producer with endogenous formation of locational marginal prices. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 24(4), 1855-1866.
- Steeger, G., & Rebennack, S. (2017). Dynamic convexification within nested Benders decomposition using Lagrangian relaxation: An application to the strategic bidding problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 257(2), 669-686.
- Tangerås, T. P., & Mauritzen, J. (2018). Real‐time versus day‐ahead market power in a hydro‐based electricity market. The Journal of industrial economics, 66(4), 904-941.
- Zerrahn, A., & Huppmann, D. (2017). Network expansion to mitigate market power. Networks and Spatial Economics, 17, 611-644.
|
