تعداد نشریات | 44 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,303 |
تعداد مقالات | 16,020 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 52,485,477 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 15,213,041 |
تاثیر بیوچار چوبی، لئوناردیت و زغالسنگ بر برخی ویژگیهای کیفی کمپوست حاصل از کمپوستشدن مشترک کود دامی و مواد آلی جنگلی | ||
دانش آب و خاک | ||
مقاله 10، دوره 34، شماره 3، مهر 1403، صفحه 161-178 اصل مقاله (755.51 K) | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/ws.2024.60611.2552 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
عادل ریحانی تبار* 1؛ مریم راجی2؛ کمال خلخال3؛ آرش همتی4؛ محمد رضا ساریخانی5 | ||
1استاد دانشگاه تبریز | ||
2دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد گروه علوم خاک دانشگاه تبریز | ||
3مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان کرمانشاه. بخش تحقیقات خاک و آب | ||
4مدیر عامل شرکت قیزیل توپراق سهند | ||
5دانشیار بیولوژی و بیوتکنولوژی خاک، گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز | ||
چکیده | ||
کمپوستسازی رهیافت موثر مدیریت ضایعات آلی است ولی معایبی همچون تصاعد گازهای خطرناک حین تولید دارد. برای غلبه بر این معایب از برخی افزودنیهای آلی و معدنی در فرایند تولید استفاده میشود. در این پژوهش اثر بیوچارچوبی، لئوناردیت و زغالسنگ بر برخی ویژگیها و شاخصهای کیفی کمپوست مشترک کود دامی و مواد آلی جنگلی مطالعه شد. آزمایش به صورت فاکتوریل در طرح پایه کاملا تصادفی با سه تکرار اجرا گردید. فاکتور اول تیمار شامل بیوچار چوبی، لئوناردیت و زغالسنگ در دو سطح 2 و 4 درصد وزنی و فاکتور دوم زمان شامل 12 هفته بود. در طول فرایند کمپوست شدن، دما، pH، EC، غلظت نیتروژن کل، درصد کربن آلی و برخی شاخصهای کیفی همچون شاخص هوموسیشدن(HR)، نسبت هوموسیشدن(HI)، درجه پلیمریزاسیون(DP) و مجموع مواد هیومیک(HS) اندازهگیری شدند. بر طبق نتایج حاصله، برخلاف pH، در مورد دمای توده کمپوست تیمارها تفاوت معناداری با تیمار شاهد داشتند و تیمار زغالسنگ در سطح 2 درصد بالاترین دما، تیمار لئوناردیت 2 درصد بیشترین طول مدت زمان فاز ترموفیلی و تیمارهای لئوناردیت 2 و 4 درصد بالاترین درصد نیتروژن کل را نشان دادند. در این پژوهش زغالسنگ در سطح 4 درصد باعث افزایش معنادارEC کمپوست شد. بیوچار و زغالسنگ باعث افزایش کربن آلی در بسترهای کمپوست شدند. تیمارهای لئوناردیت 2 و 4 درصد بالاترین مقادیر شاخصهای هوموسیشدن (HS، DP، HI، HR) را ایجاد ولی تفاوت معناداری با یکدیگر نداشتند. به طورکلی تیمارهای لئوناردیت از لحاظ شاخصهای رسیدگی کمپوست نهایی و تیمارهای بیوچار و زغال سنگ برای تسریع کمپوست شدن در مراحل اولیه مفید تشخیص داده شدند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
بیوچار؛ زغالسنگ؛ لئوناردیت؛ کمپوستشدن مشترک؛ هوموسیشدن | ||
مراجع | ||
Adani F, Genevini P, Tambone F and Montoneri E, 2006. Compost effect on soil humic acid: a NMR study. Chemosphere 65: 1414–1418.
Adani F, Genevini PL, Gasperi F and Tambone F, 1999. Composting and humification. Compost Science & Utilization 7(7): 24–33.
Akdeniz N, 2019. A systematic review of biochar use in animal waste composting. Waste Management 88: 291–300.
Amir S, Benlboukht F, Cancian N, Winterton P and Hafidi M, 2008. Physico-chemical analysis of tannery solid waste and structural characterization of its isolated humic acids after composting. Journal of Hazardous Materials 160(2–3): 448–455.
ASTM, 2007. Standard Method for Chemical Analysis of Wool Charcoal. D1762-84, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
Awasthi MK, Wang Q, Chen H, Awasthi SK, Wang M, Ren X and Zhang Z, 2018. Beneficial effect of mixture of additives amendment on enzymatic activities, organic matter degradation and humification during biosolids co-composting. Bioresource Technology 247: 138-146.
Barthod J, Rumpel C and Dignac MF, 2018. Composting with additives to improve organic amendments. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 38(2): 1–23.
Behera S and Samal K, 2022. Sustainable approach to manage solid waste through biochar assisted composting. Energy Nexus 7: 100121.
Bernal MP, Paredes C, Monedero MA and Cegarra J, 1998. Maturity and stabili parameters of compost prepared with a wide range of organic waste. Bioresource Technology 63: 91-99.
Bremner JM, 1996. Nitrogen-total. Pp. 1085–1121. In: Sparks DL, (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3, Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, USA.
Busato JG, Lima LS, Aguiar NO, Canellas LP and Olivares FL, 2012. Changes in labile phosphorus forms during maturation of vermicompost enriched with phosphorus-solubilizing and diazotrophic bacteria. Bioresource Technology 110: 390–395.
Bustamante MA, Paredes C, Marhuenda-Egea FC, Pérez-Espinosa A, Bernal MP and Moral R, 2008. Co-composting of distillery wastes with animal manures: Carbon and nitrogen transformations in the evaluation of compost stability. Chemosphere 72: 551–557.
Campbell AG, Flok RL and Tripcpi R, 1997. Wood ash as an amendment in municipalsludge and yard waste composting process. Compost Science & Utilization 5(1): 62–73.
Carter MR and Gregorich EG, 2007. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. CRC press.
Chen YX, Huang XD, Han ZY, Huang X, Hu B, Shi DZ,and Wu WX, 2010. Effects of bamboo charcoal, and bamboo vinegar on nitrogen conservation, and heavy metals immobility during pig manure composting. Chemosphere 78(9): 1177-1181.
Chung WJ, Chang S, Chaudhary DK, Shin J, Kim H, Karmegam N and Ravindran B, 2021. Effect of biochar amendment on compost quality, gaseous emissions and pathogen reduction during in-vessel composting of chicken manure. Chemosphere 283: 131129.
Dias BO, Silva CA, Higashikawa FS, Roig A and Sánchez-Monedero MA, 2010. Use of biochar as bulking agent for the composting of poultry manure: effect on organic matter degradation and humification. Bioresource Technology 101(4): 1239-1246.
Doublet J, Francou C, Poitrenaud M and Houot S, 2011. Influence of bulking agents on organic matter evolution during sewage sludge composting; consequences on compost organic matter stability and N availability. Bioresource Technology 102(2): 1298–1307.
Epstein E, 1997. The Science of Composting. Technomic Publishing Company, Lancaster.UK.
Gabhane J, William SP, Bidyadhar R, Bhilawe P, Anand D, Vaidya AN and Wate SR, 2012. Additives aided composting of green waste: effects on organic matter degradation, compost maturity, and quality of the finished compost. Bioresource Technology 114: 382–388.
Goyal S, Dhull SK and Kapoor KK, 2005. Chemical and biological changes during composting of different organic wastes and assessment of compost maturity. Bioresource Technology 96(14): 1584–1591.
Helal AA, Murad GA and Helal AA, 2011. Characterization of different humic materials by various analytical techniques. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 4: 51–54.
Hemati A, 2017. Isolation of thermophile ligninolytic microorganisms for acceleration of compost production and its quality improvement. Doctoral Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University. (in Persian with English abstract)
Jalili M, Mokhtari M, Eslami H, Abbasi F, Ghanbari R and Ebrahimi AA, 2019. Toxicity evaluation and management of co-composting pistachio wastes combined with cattle manure and municipal sewage sludge. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 171: 798-804.
Jiang JS, Kang K, Wang CJ, Sun XJ, Dang S, Wang N, Wang Y, Zhang CY, Yan GX and Li YB, 2018. Evaluation of total greenhouse gas emissions during sewage sludge composting by the different dicyandiamide added forms: mixing, surface broadcasting, and their combination. Waste Management 81: 94–103.
Kumar R, Singh S and Singh OV, 2008. Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 35(5): 377–391.
Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC and Crowley D, 2011. Biochar effects on soil biota–a review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43(9): 1812–1836.
Li D, Manu MK, Varjani S and Wong JW, 2023. Role of tobacco, and bamboo biochar on food waste digestate co-composting: Nitrogen conservation, greenhouse gas emissions, and compost quality. Waste Management 156: 44-54.
Li G, Zhu QH, Niu QQ, Meng QR, Yan HL, Wang SS and Li QL, 2021. The degradation of organic matter coupled with the functional characteristics of microbial community during composting with different surfactants. Bioresource Technology 321: 124446.
Li R, Wang JJ, Zhang Z, Shen F, Zhang G, Qin R, Li X and Xiao R, 2012. Nutrient transformations during composting of pig manure with bentonite. Bioresource Technology 121: 362–368.
Liu Z, Wang D, Ning T, Zhang S, Yang Y, He Z and Li Z, 2017. Sustainability assessment of straw utilization circulation modes based on the emergetic ecological footprint. Ecological Indicators 75: 1–7.
Machovic V, Mizera J, Sykorova I and Borecká L, 2000. Ion-exchange properties of Czech oxidized coals. Acta Montana 117: 15–26.
Malińska K, Zabochnicka-Świątek M and Dach J, 2014. Effects of biochar amendment on ammonia emission during composting of sewage sludge. Ecological Engineering 71: 474–478.
Manu MK, Wang C, Li D, Varjani S, Xu Y, Ladumor N, Lui M, Zhou J and Wong JW, 2021. Biodegradation kinetics of ammonium enriched food waste digestate compost with biochar amendment. Bioresource Technology 341: 125871.
Mao H, Lv Z, Sun H, Li R, Zhai B, Wang Z and Zhou L, 2018. Improvement of biochar and bacterial powder addition on gaseous emission and bacterial community in pig manure compost. Bioresource Technology 258: 195-202.
Nadiri AA, Gharekhani M, Khatibi R, Sadeghfam S and Moghaddam AA, 2017. Groundwater vulnerability indices conditioned by supervised intelligence committee machine (SICM). Science of the Total Environment 574: 691–706.
Nguyen MK, Lin C, Hoang HG, Sanderson P, Dang BT, Bui XT, Nguyen NSH, Vo DVN and Tran HT, 2022. Evaluate the role of biochar during the organic waste composting process: A critical review. Chemosphere 299: 134488.
Olivella MA, Del Rio JC and Palacios J, 2001. Characterization of humic acid from leonarditecoal: an integrated study of PY-GC-MS, XPS and XANES techniques. Journal of Anaiytical and Applied Pyrolysis 63(2002): 59-68.
Peters J, 2003. Recommended Methods of Manure Analysis. Cooperative Extension publishing, University of Wisconsin.
Qi BC, Aldrich C and Lorenzen L, 2004. Effect of ultrasonication on the humic acids extracted from lignocellulose substrate decomposed by anaerobic digestion. Chemical Engineering Journal 98: 153-163.
Qu FT, Wu D, Li D, Zhao Y, Zhang RJ, Qi HS and Chen XM, 2022. Effect of Fenton pretreatment combined with bacterial inoculation on dissolved organic matter concentration during rice straw composting. Bioresource Technology 344: 126198
Rasapoor M, Nasrabadi T, Kamali M and Hoveidi H, 2009. The effects of aeration rate on generated compost quality, using aerated static pile method. Waste Management 29: 570–573.
Sajib SK and Adhikari S, 2020. Effect of pyrolysis method on physical properties of activated biochar and its application as cathode material for lithium-sulfur battery. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 63(2): 485-493.
Sanchez-Monedero MA, Roig A, Cegarra J and Bernal MP, 1999. Relationships between water-soluble carbohydrate and phenol fractions and the humification indices of different organic wastes during composting. Bioresource Technology 70: 193–201.
Veeken A, Nierop K, Wilde VD and Hamelers B, 2000. Characterisation of NaOH-extracted humic acids during composting of a biowaste. Bioresource Technology 72: 33-41.
Wang C, Tu QQ, Dong D, Strong PJ, Wang HL, Sun B and Wu WX, 2014. Spectroscopic evidence for biochar amendment promoting humic acid synthesis and intensifying humification during composting. Journal of Hazardous Materials 280: 409–416
Wang Z, Xu Y, Yang T, Liu Y, Zheng T and Zheng C, 2023. Effects of biochar carried microbial agent on compost quality, greenhouse gas emission, and bacterial community during sheep manure composting. Biochar 5(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-022-00202-w | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 227 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 102 |