تعداد نشریات | 44 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,303 |
تعداد مقالات | 16,020 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 52,487,261 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 15,214,105 |
بررسی اثر کشت مخلوط سریهای جایگزینی و افزایشی بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد کاملینا و عدس تحت شرایط دیم وآبی | ||
دانش کشاورزی وتولید پایدار | ||
دوره 34، شماره 1، فروردین 1403، صفحه 1-20 اصل مقاله (1.1 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/saps.2023.55206.2986 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
آزیتا یاری1؛ نصرت اله عباسی* 2؛ سمیه حاجی نیا3 | ||
1دانشجوی دکتری فیزیولوژی گیاهان زراعی، دانشکده کشاوزی، دانشگاه ایلام | ||
2عضو هیات علمی گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات دانشگاه ایلام | ||
3ایلام | ||
چکیده | ||
اهداف: این پژوهش بهمنظور ارزیابی اثر کشت مخلوط سریهای جایگزینی و افزایشی بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد دو گیـاه کاملینا و عدس تحت شرایط دیم و آبی اجرا شده است. مواد و روشها: آزمایش بهصورت کرتهای خرد شده در قالب طرح پایه بلوکهای کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در مزرعه تحقیقاتی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه ایلام در دو سال زراعی 1400-1399 و 1401-1400 اجرا شد. کرتهای اصلی شامل آبیاری در دو سطح (دیم و آبی) و کرتهای فرعی شامل الگویهای کشت مخلوط جایگزینی و افزایشی در نُه سطح شامل (75 درصد کاملینا+ 25 درصد عدس، 50 درصد کاملینا+ 50 درصد عدس، 25 درصد کاملینا+ 75 درصد عدس، 100 درصد کاملینا+ 25 درصد عدس، 100 درصد کاملینا+ 50 درصد عدس، 100 درصد کاملینا+ 75 درصد عدس، 100 درصد کاملینا+ 100 درصد عدس، کشت خالص کاملینا و عدس) بودند. یافتهها: نتایج نشان داد بیشترین عملکرد دانه (1827 کیلوگرم در هکتار) و عملکرد بیولوژیکی کاملینا (7012 کیلوگرم در هکتار) در سری افزایشی 100درصد کاملینا+ 25 درصد عدس و بیشترین عملکرد دانه و بیولوژیکی عدس بهترتیب 750 و 1950 مربوط به کشت خالص عدس مشاهده شد. ارزیابی نسبت برابری زمین نشاندهنده برتری تمام نسبتهای کشت مخلوط کاملینا و عدس بر تککشتی آنها بود و ریهای افزایشی 100 درصد کاملینا+ 75 درصد عدس و 100 درصد کاملینا+ 100 درصد عدس بیشترین نسبت برابری زمین را به خود اختصاص دادند. نتیجهگیری: نتایج نشان داد کشت مخلوط جایگزینی کاملینا و عدس تحت شرایط دیم و آبی در مقایسه با تککشتی آنها سودمند و برتر بودند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
الگوی کاشت؛ تنش خشکی؛ رقابت؛ شاخص غالبیت؛ کاملینا؛ نسبت برابری زمین | ||
مراجع | ||
Abdel-Galil AM and Abdel-Ghany REA. 2014. Effect of groundnut–sesame intercropping and nitrogen fertilizer on yield, yield components and infection of root–rot and wilt diseases. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 3(6): 623-643
Alizadeh A. 2001. Drought and necessity of increase in water productivity. Quarterly Science Extension of Aridity and Agricultural Drought, 2: 3-8.
Amiri, DN, Nourmohammadi G, Shiranim RAH, Mirhadi SMJ and Majidi HI. 2020. Investigating the effect of ammonium sulfate and potassium sulfate application on seed and oil yields of Camelina (Camelina sativa L.) under late-season drought stress. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 30(2): 239-251. (In Persian).
Bai Y, Feng X, Xing H, Xu Y, Kim BK, Baig N and Zimmerman SC. 2016. A highly efficient single-chain metal–organic nanoparticle catalyst for alkyne–azide reactions in water and in cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 138(35): 11077-11080.
Campiglia E, Mancinelli R, Radicetti E and Baresel JP. 2014. Evaluating spatial arrangement for durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) and sub clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) intercropping systems. Field Crops Research, 169: 49-57.
Chimonyo VGP, Modi AT and Mabhaudhi T. 2016. Simulating yield and water use of a sorghum–cowpea intercrop using APSIM. Agricultural Water Management, 177: 317-328.
Corassa GM, Amado TJ, Strieder ML, Schwalbert R, Pires JL, Carter PR and Ciampitti IA. 2018. Optimum soybean seeding rates by yield environment in southern Brazil. Agronomy Journal, 110(6): 2430-2438.
Crusciol CAC, Nascente AS, Mateus GP, Pariz CM, Martins PO and Borghi E. 2014. Intercropping soybean and palisade grass for enhanced land use efficiency and revenue in a no till system. European Journal of Agronomy, 58: 53-62.
Davoodian R and Hamzei J. 2019. Evaluation of advantage and yield quality in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) intercropping under nitrogen fertilizer. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 29(4): 19-36. (In Persian).
Dhima KV, Lithourgidis AS, Vasilakoglou IB and Dordas CA. 2007. Competition indices of vetch and cereal intercrops in two ratios. Field Crop Research, 100: 249-256.
Eskandari H and Alizadeh-Amraie A. 2016. Evaluation of growth and species composition of weeds in maize-cowpea intercropping based on additive series under organic farming condition. Journal of Agroecology, 8: 227-240. (In Persian).
Ghale Noyee SG, Koocheki A, Yazdi MTNP and Jahan M. 2017. Effect of different treatments of mixed and row intercropping on yield and yield components of sesame and bean. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 15(3): 588-602. (In Persian).
Hasani Balyani M, Tadayon MR and Fadaei Tehrani AA. 2020. Evaluation of some growth and yield traits of Camelina sativa L. under the influence of biological and chemical fertilizers. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 10(1): 39-51. (In Persian)
Homer A, Sahin M and Kucukozdemir U. 2016. Evaluation of pea (Pisum sativum L.) germplasm for winter hardiness in central Anatolia, Turkey, using field and controlled environment. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 52(2): 55-63
Hong Y, Berentsen P, Heerink N, Shi M and van der Wer W. 2019. The future of intercropping under growing resource scarcity and declining grain prices - A model analysis based on a case study in Northwest China. Agricultural Systems, 176: 1-13.
Hosseini SM, and Hassibi P, 2013. Effects of water deficit stress on several quantitative and qualitative characteristics of canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 3(3): 120-125.
Hosseinzadeh M, Hoseini SMB and Alizadeh H. 2021. Study of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) intercropping under weed control and non-control conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 52(3): 147-162.
Ismailian Y and Behzadamiri M. 2020. Agricultural and economic evaluation of safflower and chickpea mixed cultivation under micronutrient application conditions. Scientific Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 15: 1-20. (In Persian).
Kahrizi D, Rostami AH and Akbarabadi A. 2015. Feasibility cultivation of Camelina (Camelina sativa) as medicinal-oil plant in rainfed conditions in Kermanshah-Iran's first report. Journal of Medicinal Plants and By-Products, 2: 215-217.
Khorramdel S, Siahmargue A and Mahmoodi Q. 2016. Effect of replacement and additive intercropping series of ajowan with bean on yield and yield components. Crop Production, 9(1): 1-24. (In Persin).
Koocheki A, Nourbakhsh F and Cheshmi M. 2016. Assessment of yield, nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiency in wheat and canola. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 15(3): 559-574. (In Persian)
Koocheki A, Zarghani H and Norooziyan A. 2016. Comparison of yield and yield components of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and red bean (Phaseolus calcaratus) under different intercropping arrangements. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 14 (2): 226-243. (In Persian).
Kumar D, Ardeshna RB, Patel AK and Singh N. (2017). Economic assessment and biological feasibility of summer sesamum based intercropping systems. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7(7): 1332-1337.
Mahfouz H and Migawer EA. 2014. Effect of intercropping, weed control treatment and their interaction on yield and its attributes of chickpea and canola. Egyptian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 19(4): 84-101.
Mashhadi T, Nakhzari Moghaddam A and Sabouri H. 2015. Investigation of competition indices in intercropping of wheat and chickpea under nitrogen consumption. Journal Agroecological, 7(3): 344-355. (In Persian).
Mehdipour H, Abbasi R, Abbasian A. 2019. Effect of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) cover crop density on seed yield and yield components of Ssesame (Sesame indicum L.) and weed Control. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 29(2): 255-266. (In Persian)
Moradi P, Asghari J, Mohsen Abadi GR and Samiezadeh HA. 2015. The role of triple cultures in weed control and yield of pumpkin seeds (Cucurbita pepo L.). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production.
Morales D, Potlakayala S, Soliman M, Daramola J, Weeden H, Jones A, Kovak E, Lowry E, Patel P. and Puthiyaparambil J. 2017. Effect of biochemical and physiological response to salt stress in Camelina sativa. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 48(7): 716-729.
Moravveji S, Zamani GR, Kafi M and Alizadeh Z., 2016. Effect of different salinity levels on yield and yield components of spring canola cultivars (Brassica napus L.) and Indian mustard (B. juncea L.). Environmental Stresses in Agricultural Sciences, 10(3), 445-457. (In Persian).
Nakhzari Moghaddam A, Dehghanpour Inchehbron O and Rahemi Karizaki A. 2016. The effects of nitrogen levels and intercropping pattern on forage yield and competition indices of barley and pea. Electronic Journal of Crop Production. 9: 1. 199-214. (In Persian).
Nasiri Mahallati M, Koocheki A, Mondani F, Amirmoradi Sh and Feizi H. 2015. Evaluation of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) growth indices in strip intercropping. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 13(1): 14-23. (In Persian).
Nasrollahzadeh Asl A and Talebi M. (2016). Evaluation of sunflower (Heliantus annuus L.) and corn (Zea mays L.) intercropping based on replacement method in Khoy region. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 8(27): 204-215. (In Persian).
Parsa M and Bagheri A. 2013. Pulses. Publications by Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian).
Piri I, Zendehdel B and Tavassoli A. 2016. Study of Agronomical and Ecological Parameters of Additive and Replacement Intercropping Systems of Corn (Zea maize L.) and Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Journal of Agroecology, 19(3): 705-721. (In Persian).
Potzsch F, Lux G, Lewandowska S, Bellingrath-Kimurac SD and Schmidtke K. 2019. Optimizing relative seed frequency of intercropped pea and spring barley. European Journal of Agronomy, 105: 32- 40.
Rabiee M and Jilani, M. 2015. Effect of row spacing and seed rate on yield and yield component of Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars in Guilan Province. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 6(1): 9-20. (In Persian).
Raseduzzaman M and Jensen ES. 2017. Does intercropping enhance yield stability in arable crop production? A meta-analysis. European Journal of Agronomy, 91: 25-33.
Rezaei Chianeh A and Qoli Nejad A. 2014. Study of agronomic characteristics and usefulness indices in intercropping of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and black seed (Nigella sativa L.). Agroecology, 7: 381-396. (In Persian).
Rezaei Chiyaneh E, Tajbakhsh M and Fotohi Chiyaneh S. 2014. Yield and yield components off enugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) in strip intercropping with ajowan (Carum copticum L.) influenced by bio and chemical fertilizer. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 24(4): 1-15. (In Persin).
Salari F, Khalesro S, Heidari G and Ghobari H. 2020. Comparison of quantitative and qualitative traits of safflower and chickpea in replacement and additive intercropping systems. Field Crop Science, 51(3): 129-138. (In Persian).
Seyedi SM and Hamzei J. 2020. Evaluation of advantageous of sunflower-grain legume intercropping. Journal of Crop Production, 13(1): 85-98. (In Persian).
Sintim HY, Zheljazkov VD, Obour AK, Garcia Y, Garcia A and Foulke TK. 2016. Evaluating agronomic responses of camelina to seeding date under rain‐fed conditions. Agronomy Journal, 108(1): 349-357.
Srivastava R.P. and Vasishtha H. 2012. Saponins and lectins of Indian chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) and lentils (Lens culinaris). Indian Journal of Agricultural Biochemistry, 25: 44-47.
Tanzeelur R, Xin L, Sajad H, Shoaib A, Guopeng C, Feng Y, Lilian C, Junbo D, Weiguo L and Wenyu Y. 2017. Water use efficiency and evapotranspiration in maize-soybean relay strip intercrop systems as affected by planting geometries. PLoS ONE, 12(6).
Waraich EA, Ahmad R, Ahmad Z, Barutcular C, Erman M, Cig F, Saneoka H and OzturkF. 2020. Comparative study of growth, physiology and yield attributes of camelina (Camelina sativa L.) and canola (Brassica napus L.) under different irrigation regimes. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 52(5): 1537-1544.
Willey RM. 1979. Intercropping, its importance and research needs, competition and yield advantages. Journal of Field Crop Abstracts, 32: 1-10.
Yang, C., Fan, Zh. & Chai, Q. (2018). Agronomic and economic benefits of pea/maize intercropping systems in relation to N fertilizer and maize density. Agronomy, 8(4), 14p. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy8040052
Zafaranieh M. 2015. Effect of various combinations of safflower/chickpea intercropping on yield and yield components of safflower. Agriculture Science Developments, 4: 31-34. (In Persian). | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 363 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 772 |