آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,538 |
| تعداد مقالات | 18,760 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 62,609,402 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 22,570,919 |
The effect of sowing date and planting density on grain yield and some nutritional quality characteristics of three seed-quinoa genotypes | ||
| Journal of Plant Physiology and Breeding | ||
| دوره 13، شماره 2، 2023، صفحه 197-215 اصل مقاله (524.79 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jppb.2022.53073.1286 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Barakatullah Rabbani1؛ Mahmud Khoramivafa* 1؛ Mohsen Saeidi1؛ Leila Zarei1؛ Mahmoud Bagheri2 | ||
| 1Department of Plant Genetics and Production, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran | ||
| 2Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension (AREEO), Karaj, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) is a plant with high nutritional value and has good adaptability to different growing conditions. To investigate the effects of planting date and density on the seed quality of three quinoa genotypes (Q29, Titicaca, and Red Carina), a field experiment was conducted in 2019-2020 at the research field of Agriculture and Natural Resources Campus, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. The seeds were sown on three dates (15th March, 15th April, and 15th May) under two planting densities (40 and 60 plants/m2). The experiment was conducted as a split-plot factorial design based on the randomized complete block design with three replications. The results revealed that both sowing date and plant density influenced the nutritional composition of the quinoa genotypes. The grain yield varied between 1642 and 2351 kg/ha, and the amino acids profile varied according to planting date and planting density. The amino acids histidine, glutamic acid, leucine, and lysine increased with delaying sowing date whereas threonine, tyrosine, arginine, methionine, glycine, proline, isoleucine, valine, serine, alanine, aspartic acid, asparagine, cysteine, phenylalanine, and glutamine decreased with delaying the sowing date from 15 March to 15 May. The Titicaca genotype produced maximum grain yield under the third sowing date while in the case of the first sowing date, all studied genotypes were more responsive regarding most amino acids. Also, the most suitable plant density to result in the highest grain yield was 60 plants/m2. The mineral content of the quinoa seeds was not influenced significantly by the sowing date, plant density, genotype, and their interactions, except for calcium which was affected significantly by the genotype. The lowest saponin content was observed in Titicaca under the planting density of 40 plants/m2. These results indicated that both sowing dates and plant densities influence the nutritional composition of quinoa genotypes. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| cultivar؛ grain yield؛ minerals؛ nutritional value؛ protein | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Awadalla A, Morsy AS. 2017. Influence of planting dates and nitrogen fertilization on the performance of quinoa genotypes under Toshka conditions. Egypt J Agron. 39: 27–40.
Bagheri M. 2021. Study of dormant sowing possibility for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivation in moderate and cold climates. Final Report of Research Project No. 59662. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension, Iran (In Persian).
Craine EB, Murphy KM. 2020. Seed composition and amino acid profiles for quinoa grown in Washington State. Front Nutr. 7: 1–16.
Dakhili S, Abdolalizadeh L, Hosseini SM, Shojaee-Aliabadi S, Mirmoghtadaie L. 2019. Quinoa protein: composition, structure, and functional properties. Food Chem. 299: 125–161.
De Bock P, van Bockstaele F, Muylle H, Quataert P, Vermeir P, Eeckhout M, Cnops G. 2021. Yield and nutritional characterization of thirteen quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) varieties grown in north-west Europe-Part I. Plants. 10: 2689.
Eisa SS, Abd El Samad EH, Hussin SA, Ali EA, Ebrahim M, González JA, Ordano MA, Erazzú L.E, El Bordeny NE, Abdel-Ati AA. 2018. Quinoa in Egypt- Plant density effects on seed yield and nutritional quality in marginal regions. Middle East J Appl Sci. 8: 515–522.
Escuredo O, González Martín MI, Wells Moncada G, Fischer S, Hernández Hierro JM. 2014. Amino acid profile of the quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) using near infrared spectroscopy and chemometric techniques. J Cereal Sci. 60: 67–74.
Gonzalez JA, Konishi Y, Bruno M, Valoy M, Prado FE. 2012. Interrelationships among seed yield, total protein and amino acid composition of ten quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) cultivars from two different agroecological regions. J Sci Food Agric. 92: 1222–1229.
Granado-Rodríguez S, Aparicio N, Matías J, Pérez-Romero LF, Maestro I, Gracés I, Pedroche JJ, Haros CM, Fernandez-Garcia N, Navarro del Hierro J, et al. 2021. Studying the impact of different field environmental conditions on seed quality of quinoa: the case of three different years changing seed nutritional traits in southern Europe. Front Plant Sci. 12: 854.
Hammad E, Abo-Elwafa A, Morsy A, Awadalla A. 2021. Response of quinoa yield and seed chemical composition to planting dates and densities under the climatic conditions of Aswan Governorate. J Plant Prod. 12: 973–979.
Hinojosa L, González JA, Barrios-Masias FH, Fuentes F, Murphy KM. 2018. Quinoa abiotic stress responses: a review. Plants 7: 106.
Jacobsen SE, Christiansen JL. 2016. Some agronomic strategies for organic quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). J Agron Crop Sci. 202: 454–463.
Jahanbkhsh S, Khajoei-Nejad G, Moradi R, Naghizadeh M. 2020. Effect of planting date and salicylic acid on some quantitative and qualitative traits of quinoa as affected by drought stress. Environ Stresses Crop Sci. 13: 1149–1167. (In persian with English abstract).
Khaitov B, Karimov AA, Toderich K, Sultanova Z, Mamadrahimov A, Allanov K, Islamov S. 2020. Adaptation, grain yield and nutritional characteristics of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) genotypes in marginal environments of the Aral Sea basin. J Plant Nut. 44: 1365–1379.
Khanalizadegan A, Madandoust M, Mohajeri F, Bagheri M. 2020. Effects of planting date on yield characteristics of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Int J Pharm Phytopharm Res. (eIJPPR) 10(5): 290–298.
Koziol MJ. 1991. Afrosimetric estimation of threshold saponin concentration for bitterness in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). J Sci. Food Agric. 54: 211–219.
Matías J, Cruz V, Reguera M. 2021. Heat stress impact on yield and composition of quinoa straw under Mediterranean field conditions. Plants. 10: 955.
Miranda M, Vega-Gálvez A, Martinez E, López J, Rodríguez MJ, Henríquez K, Fuentes F. 2012. Genetic diversity and comparison of physicochemical and nutritional characteristics of six quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes cultivated in Chile. Food Sci Technol. 32: 835–843.
Mirzaie A, Mohammadi K, Parvini S, Khoramivafa M, Saeidi M. 2020. Yield quantity and quality of two linseeds (Linum usitatissimum L.) cultivars as affected by sowing date. Ind Crops Prod. 158: 112947.
Ning W, Fengxin W, Clinton CS, Chaobiao M, Lifang Q. 2020. Effects of management practices on quinoa growth seed yield and quality. J Agron. 445: 1–15.
Nowak V, Du J, Charrondière UR. 2016. Assessment of the nutritional composition of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Chem. 193: 47–54.
Owji T, Mohajeri F, Madandoust M, Salehi M. 2021. Evaluation of the effect of seed rate and nitrogen fertilizer management on agronomic characteristics and grain yield components in quinoa summer cultivation in Fars province. Int J Modern Agric. 10(1): 350–360.
Prado FE, Fernández-Turiel JL, Tsarouchi M, Psaras GK, González JA. 2014. Variation of seed mineral concentrations in seven quinoa cultivars grown in two agroecological sites. Cereal Chem. 91: 453–459.
Präger A, Munz S, Nkebiwe PM, Mast B, Graeff-Hönninger S. 2018. Yield and quality characteristics of different quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars grown under field conditions in southwestern Germany. Agronomy. 8: 197.
Qi W, Fong C, Lamport DT. 1991. Gum arabic glycoprotein is a twisted hairy rope: a new model based on O-galactosylhydroxyproline as the polysaccharide attachment site. Plant Physiol. 96: 848–855.
Rathore S, Bala M, Gupta M, Kumar R. 2019. Introduction of multipurpose agro-industrial crop quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) in western Himalayas. Indian J Agron. 64: 287–292.
Reguera M, Conesa CM, Gil-Gómez A, Haros CM, Pérez-Casas MÁ, Briones-Labarca V, Bolaños L, Bonilla I, Álvarez R, Pinto K, et al. 2018. The impact of different agroecological conditions on the nutritional composition of quinoa seeds. Peer J. 6: 4442.
Rodríguez Gómez MJ, Matías Prieto J, Cruz Sobrado V, Calvo Magro P. 2021. Nutritional characterization of six quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) varieties cultivated in southern Europe. J Food Compost Anal. 99: 103876.
Sayed SE, Abd El-Samad EH, Hussin SA, Ali EA, Ebrahim M, González JA, Ordano M, Erazzú LE, El-Bordeny NE, Abdel-Ati AA. 2018. Quinoa in Egypt - Plant density effects on seed yield and nutritional quality in marginal regions. Middle East J Appl Sci. 8 (2): 515-522.
Shams AS, Galal WK. 2014. Response of quinoa to sowing dates and chemical composition of its grain. Ann Agric Sci. 52: 319–326.
Sharma V, Chandra S, Dwivedi P, Parturkar M. 2015. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) a nutritional healthy grain. nt J Adv Res. 3: 725–736.
Thanapornpoonpong SN, Vearasilp S, Pawelzik E, Gorinstein S. 2008. Influence of various nitrogen applications on protein and amino acid profiles of amaranth and quinoa. J Agric Food Chem. 56: 11464–11470.
Wang N, Wang F, Shock CC, Meng C, Qiao L. 2020. Effects of management practices on quinoa growth, seed yield, and quality. Agronomy. 10: 1–15.
Wayne W. 2012. A reliable methodology for quantitative extraction of fruit and vegetable physiological amino acids and their subsequent analysis with commonly available HPLC systems. Food Nutr Scie. 3: 863–871.
Xia H, Wang L, Xue Y, Kong W, Xue Y, Yu R, Xu H, Wang X, Wang J, Liu Z. 2019. Impact of increasing maize densities on agronomic performances and the community stability of productivity of maize/peanut intercropping systems. Agronomy. 9: 150. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 372 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,841 |
||