آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,428 |
| تعداد مقالات | 17,571 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 57,109,257 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 18,968,505 |
Rethinking The Lockean Approach to The Problem of Personal Identity | ||
| مجله پژوهش های فلسفی | ||
| دوره 17، شماره 45، 1402، صفحه 231-249 اصل مقاله (564.86 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jpiut.2023.29464.2110 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Taiwo Wesley Osemwegie* 1؛ Ike Odimegwu2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. of Philosophy, University of Benin, Nigeria | ||
| 2Associate Professor of Philosophy Department, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The problem of personal identity among others may stem from the following question—what does be the person that you are, from one day to the next, necessarily consist of? The diachronic problem of personal identity raises question on the necessary and sufficient conditions for the identity of the person over time. The synchronic problem is grounded in the question of what features or traits characterize a given person at one time. To answer these questions, John Locke discarded the soul and the body as necessary and sufficient substances for personal identity over time. He accepted consciousness as the only criterion for personal identity; the only thing capable of remaining the same and preserving personal identity through change. Though Locke’s argument is somewhat clear and coherent but what remains vague and incoherent is embedded in the question—what exactly is consciousness? How and why should it be the basis or criterion for the determination of personal identity? Using the method of critical analysis, I argue that Locke’s choice of consciousness as the determinant of personal identity, though quite novel, is incoherent and vague. Secondly, Locke had already presumed and anticipated clearly though fallaciously the very thing he wishes to substantiate. I therefore conclude that Locke’s argument is just another way of trying to escape but inadvertently prolonging the difficulty of apparently articulating a distinction between the psychological approach and physiological approach to the problem of personal identity. However, in my submission, I propose the concept of the “other” as alternative approach— a sort of an extrinsic-intrinsic approach to the problem of personal identity. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| consciousness؛ person؛ self؛ identity؛ personal identity | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Allison, E. H. (1966). Locke’s Theory of Personal Identity: A Re-Examination, in Journal of the History of Ideas, 27, 41. University of Pennsylvania Press. Barresi, J. (2006). On Earth as It is in Heaven: Trinitarian Influences on Locke’s Account of Personal Identity, in The Pluralist, 1(1), 110-128. University of Illinois Press. Bleich J. David, (2012). Resurrection and Personal Identity, in Tradition: A Journal of Orthodox Jewish Thought, 45(3). Rabbinical Council of America. Butler J. (1736). Of Personal Identity in The Analogy of Religion. Reprinted in Perry, John (1975): ’Personal Identity’. University of California Press. Copleston, S. J. F. (1993). A History of Philosophy: Medieval Philosophy, Vol. II. Doubleday & Image Books. Hume, D. (1951). Treatise of Human Nature, Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford University Press. Iroegbu P. (2000). Kpim of Personality: Treatise on the Human Person, Eustep Publications Nig. Korfmacher, C. (2006). “Personal Identity”, in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Oxford University Press. https://www.iep.utm.edu/person-i/ [Retrieved in 2017] Locke, J. (1689). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, in Four Books. Printed by Eliz. Holt. Maduka, C. (1996). Laws and Rules of Logic: De Morgan’s Theorems in Philosophy and Logic: A First Course. Illad Publishers. Nimbalkar, N. (2011). John Locke on Personal Identity, in Brain, Mind & Consciousness: An International, Interdisciplinary Perspective, Edited by A. R. Singh & S. A. Singh. 9 (1), 268-275. A Monograph Series Devoted to the Understanding of Medicine, Mental Health, Mind, Man and their Matrix, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC/articles/PMC3115296/ [Retrieved in 2017] Reid T. (1785). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, John Bell. Shoemaker D. (2005). Personal Identity and Ethics, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-ethics. Strawson, G. (2003). The Self, in Personal Identity, Editors by R. Martin & J. Barresi, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Twisselmann, B. (2002). The Oxford Companion to the Body, Blakemore Collin & Sheila Jennett (eds.), Oxford University Press. Also cited in Wogu, I. A. (2011), Problems in Mind, Pumark Nigeria Ltd. Wilson, A. R. & Lenart, A. B. (2015). Extended Mind and Identity, in J. Clausen, Edited by N. Levy, Handbook of Neuroethics. Springer Science & Business Media. Wilson, R. A. (2005). Collective Memory, Group Minds, and the Extended Mind Thesis. Cognitive Processing, 6(4), 227-236. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-005-0012-z | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 387 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 385 |
||