آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 43 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,229 |
| تعداد مقالات | 15,075 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 50,610,569 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,702,073 |
The Effects of Critical Rationalism on the Development of Critical Thinking Abilities; A Case Study with Senior High School Students in Manizales, Colombia | ||
| مجله پژوهش های فلسفی | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 17، شماره 42، خرداد 1402، صفحه 40-54 اصل مقاله (681.3 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jpiut.2000.16570 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Carlos-Emilio García-Duque* 1؛ Héctor-Fernando Giraldo-Bedoya2 | ||
| 1Professor of Philosophy at the Department of Philosophy, Universidad de Caldas, Colombia. Professor of Epistemology, Universidad de Manizales, Colombia | ||
| 2Professor of philosophy at the Department of Philosophy, Universidad de Caldas, Colombia | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Fostering critical thinking among senior high school students in Colombia has been an unfulfilled goal. This undesirable situation has multiple causes: “critical thinking” has become a mere slogan and its meaning and scope have not been clearly specified despite being widely used in the different levels of the education system. Furthermore, the strategies designed to teach critical thinking lack creativity, reinforce rote learning and the sheer repetition of logic rules besides misallocating the goal of reasoning and argumentation by focusing only on rhetorical persuasion. Textbooks and core literature in critical thinking suggest that a critical thinker is someone who always has plenty of arguments to defend her beliefs besides being ready to address even destructive criticism. By contrast, critical rationalism emphasizes the importance of a humble approach, acknowledges error, and portrays a critical thinker as someone who is ready to test her most beloved theories against experience and to reject them in the light of the facts that contradict her beliefs and certainties. We consider that a pedagogical approach enriched with fallibilism might be central for a better education and endorse these views with the results of a case study conducted in Manizales, Colombia, which shows that teaching the basics of logic and argumentation by using the central tenets of critical rationalism fosters critical thinking among senior high school students | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Critical Rationalism؛ Critical Thinking؛ Developing Reasoning Abilities؛ Popper | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Campbell, D. & Stanley, C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally & Company. Copi, I., Cohen, C. & McMahon, K. (2013). Introduction to Logic. Rutledge. Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. D.C. Heath & Co Publishers. Dunne, G. (2015). Beyond critical thinking to critical being: Criticality in higher education and life. International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 71, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.03.003 Ennis, R. (1987). A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. In: J. Boyko & R. Stenberg (eds.), Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice. Freeman and Company. Facione, P. (1998). Critical Thinking: What it is and Why it Counts. California Academic Press. Fisher, A. (1988). The Logic of Real Arguments. Cambridge University Press. García, C. (2005). Cinco tesis sobre el estado del desarrollo de habilidades de pensamiento crítico en instituciones de educación superior de la región. https://bit.ly/3wTCgTy Giraldo, H. & García, C. (2019). The usefulness of critical rationalism in the theoretical and practical education field. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, 15(1), 91-110. Harari, Y. (2018). 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. Spiegel & Grau. Harford, T. (2011). Trial, Error, and the God Complex [video]. YouTube. https://bit.ly/3TC1iAE Lipman, M. (1974). Harry Stottlemier's Discovery. Montclair State Coll.; Upper Montclair; N.J. Inst. for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children. Lipman, M. (1988). Philosophy Goes to School. Temple University Press. Lipman, M., Sharp, A. & Oscanyan, F. (1980). Philosophy in the classroom. Temple University Press. McNamara, D. R. (1978). Sir Karl Popper and education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 26(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.1978.9973506 Miller, D. (2005). Do We Reason When We Think We Reason, or Do We Think? Learning for Democracy, 1(3), 57-71. https://bit.ly/3CE2kpu Paul, R. (2012) Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World. Foundation for Critical Thinking. Revised Third Edition Pinker, S. (2021). Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters? Viking. Popper, K. (1945). The Open Society and Its Enemies. Rutledge & Kegan Paul. 5th edition 1966. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Rutledge & Kegan Paul. Popper, K. (1970). Normal science and its dangers. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (pp. 51-58). Cambridge University Press. Popper, K. (1998). The World of Parmenides. Essays on the Pre-Socratic Enlightenment. Rutledge. Schlecht, L. (1989). Critical thinking courses: their value and limits. Teaching philosophy, 12(2), 131-140. Siegel, H. (1988). Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking, and Education. Rutledge. Siegel, H. (1989). The Rationality of Science, Critical Thinking, and Science Education. Synthese, 80(1), 9-41. Stevenson L. & Haberman, D. (2004). Ten Theories of Human Nature. Oxford University Press. Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 178 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 253 |
||