انقلاب های علمی و پیشرفت: تأمّلی در فلسفه علم کوهن و بسکار

-       Archer, M.; Bhaskar, R.; Collier, A.; Lawson, T. & Norrie, A. (Eds.) (2013) Critical realism: Essential readings, Routledge.

-       Baert, P. (2005) Philosophy of the social sciences: Towards pragmatism, Polity.

-       Benton, T. & Craib, I. (2010) Philosophy of social science: The philosophical foundations of social thought, Macmillan International Higher Education.

-       Bhaskar, R. (2008) A Realist Theory of Science, Routledge.

-       Bird, A. (2007) “What is scientific progress?”, Noûs, 41(1), 64-89.

-       Chalmers, A. F. (1990) Science and its fabrication, University of Minnesota Press.

-       Chalmers, A. F. (2013) What is this thing called science?, Hackett Publishing.

-       Clarke, S. (2010) “Transcendental realisms in the philosophy of science: on Bhaskar and Cartwright”, Synthese, 173(3), 299-315.

-       Damböck, C. (2014) “Kuhn’s notion of scientific progress: “Reduction” between incommensurable theories in a rigid structuralist framework”, Synthese, 191(10), 2195-2213.

-       Dellsén, F. (2018) “Scientific progress: Four accounts”, Philosophy Compass, 13(11), e12525.

-       Duindam, G. (2018) “Why critical realists ought to be transcendental idealists”, Journal of Critical Realism, 17(3), 297-307.

-       Fleetwood, S. (2011) “Powers and tendencies revisited”, Journal of Critical Realism, 10(1), 80-99.

-       Fleetwood, S. (2017) “The critical realist conception of open and closed systems”, Journal of economic methodology, 24(1), 41-68.

-       Hibberd, F. J. (2010) “Situational realism, critical realism, causation and the charge of positivism”, History of the Human Sciences, 23(4), 37-51.

-       Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1990) “Kuhn's conception of incommensurability”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 21(3), 481-492.

-       Kuhn, T. S. (1970) the Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press.

-       Losee, J. (2004) Theories of scientific progress: An introduction, Routledge.

-       Niiniluoto, I. (2017) “Optimistic realism about scientific progress”, Synthese, 194(9), 3291-3309.

-       Orman, T. F. (2016) “Paradigm” as a central concept in Thomas Kuhn’s thought”, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(10), 47-52.

-       Park, S. (2018) “Can Kuhn’s taxonomic incommensurability be an image of science?” The Kuhnian image of science: time for a decisive transformation, 61-74.

-       Politi, V. (2019) “Specialization and The Incommensurability Among Scientific Specialties”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 50(1), 129-144.

-       Prelević, D. (2019) “Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis: Good Examples Still to Be Found”, Filozofia Nauki, 27(4 (108)), 61-77.

-       Roselli, A. (2018) “Realists Waiting for Godot? The Verisimilitudinarian and the Cumulative Approach to Scientific Progress”, Erkenntnis, 1-14.

-       Shan, Y. (2019) “A New Functional Approach to Scientific Progress”, Philosophy of Science, 86(4), 739-758.

-       Shan, Y. (2020) “Kuhn’s “wrong turning” and legacy today”, Synthese, 197(1), 381-406.

-       Yucel, R. (2018) “Scientists’ Ontological and Epistemological Views about Science from the Perspective of Critical Realism”, Science & Education, 27(5-6), 407-433.