- Alter, T. 2013. “Social Externalism and the Knowledge Argument.” Mind 122: 481–96.
- Bach, K. 1987. Thought and Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Block, N. & Stalnaker, R. 1999. “Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap.” Philosophical Review 108 (1): 1–46.
- Block, N. 2006. “Max Black’s Objection to Mind-Body Identity.” In Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism, T. Alter and S. Walter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Burge, T. 1979. “Individualism and the Mental.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4 (1): 73–122.
- Burge, T. 2003. Reflections and Replies: Essays on the Philosophy of Tyler Burge, Eds. M. Hahn and B. Ramberg. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
- Carruthers, P. 2004. “Phenomenal Concepts and Higher-Order Experiences. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68: 316–36.
- Crane, T. 2012. “Tye on Acquaintance and the Problem of Consciousness.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (1): 190–98.
- Dennett, D. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown.
- Dretske, F. 1969. Seeing and Knowing. University of Chicago Press.
- Dretske, F. 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Dretske, F. 1995. Naturalizing the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Dretske, F. 1999. “The Mind’s Awareness of Itself.” Philosophical Studies 95 (12): 103–24.
- Evans, G. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Halsey, R. & Chapanis, A. 1951. “On the Number of Absolutely Identifiable Spectral Hues.” Journal of the Optical Society of America 41: 1057–58.
- Harman, G. 1990. “The Intrinsic Quality of Experience.” Philosophical Perspectives, 4, 31–52.
- Hill, C. S. 1997. “Imaginability, Conceivability, Possibility, and the Mind-Body Problem.” Philosophical Studies 87: 61–85.
- Horgan, T. 1984. “Jackson on Physical Information and Qualia.” Philosophical Quarterly 34: 147–83.
- Ismael, J. 1999. “Science and the Phenomenal.” Philosophy of Science 66: 351–69.
- Jackson, F. 1982. “Epiphenomenal Qualia.” Philosophical Quarterly 32 (April): 127–36.
- Jeshion, R. 2010. “Singular Thought: Acquaintance, Semantic Instrumentalism and Cognitivism.” In New Essays on Singular Thought, Ed. Robin Jeshion. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 105–40.
- Kant, I. : Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1781). Critique of Pure Reason, Eds. and Trans. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
- Levine, J. 1983. “Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64 (October): 354–61.
- Levine, J. 2001. Purple Haze: The Puzzle of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Levine, J. 2006. “What is a Phenomenal Concept?” In Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism, T. Alter and S. Walter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Loar, B. 1990/97. “Phenomenal States.” Philosophical Perspectives 4: Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind, J. Tomberlin: 81–108. Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview. Revised version in The Nature of Consciousness, Eds. N. Block, O. Flanagan, and G. Güzeldere: 597–616. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997.
- Lycan, W. 1996. Consciousness and Experience. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
- Nagel, T. 1974. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” Philosophical Review 4: 435–50.
- Nemirow, L. 2006. “So, This Is What It's Like: A Defense of the Ability Hypothesis.” In Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism, T. Alter and S. Walter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Nida-Rümelin, M. 1996. “What Mary Couldn’t Know.” In Conscious Experience, Ed. Thomas Metzinger. Exeter: Imprint Academic: 219–41.
- Nida-Rumelin, M. 2002. “Qualia: The Knowledge Argument.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Ed. E. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu.
- O’Dea, J. 2002. “The Indexical Nature of Sensory Concepts.” Philosophical Papers 31: 169–81.
- Papineau, D. 1993. Philosophical Naturalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Papineau, D. 2002. Thinking about Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Papineau, D. 2006. “Phenomenal Concepts and the Materialist Constraint.” In Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism, T. Alter and S. Walter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Perry, J. 2001. Knowledge, Possibility and Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Rey, G. 1995. “Dennett’s Unrealistic Psychology.” Philosophical Topics 22 (1/2): 259–89.
- Rey, G. 1998. “A Narrow Representationalist Account of Qualitative Experience.” Philosophical Perspectives 12 (S12): 435–58.
- Russell, B. 1910–11 (1912). “Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description” in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society XI: pp. 108–28, re-impressed in Bertrand Russell (1912) The Problems of Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ryle, G. 1949. “Meaning and Necessity.” Philosophy 24 (88): 69–76.
- Schellenberg, S. 2018. The Unity of Perception: Content, Consciousness, Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Shoemaker, S. 1996. The First-Person Perspective and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Smith, N. K. 2003. A Commentary to Kant's 'Critique of Pure Reason, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Stoljar, D. 2005. “Physicalism and Phenomenal Concepts.” Mind and Language 20: 469–94.
- Sturgeon, S. 1994. “The Epistemic Basis of Subjectivity.” Journal of Philosophy 91: 221–35.
- Tye, M. & Sainsbury, R. M. 2012. Seven Puzzles of Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Tye, M. 1995. Ten Problems of Consciousness: A Representational Theory of the Phenomenal Mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
- Tye, M. 2000. “Knowing What It Is Like: The Ability Hypothesis and the Knowledge Argument.” In Consciousness, Color, and Content, Ed. Gerhard Preyer. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 223.
- Tye, M. 2003. “A Theory of Phenomenal Concepts.” In Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, Ed. Anthony O’Hear. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91–105.
- Tye, M. 2009. Consciousness Revisited: Materialism without Phenomenal Concepts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Tye, M. 2012. “Reply to Crane, Jackson and McLaughlin.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (1): 215–232.
|