آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,428 |
| تعداد مقالات | 17,578 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 57,061,035 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 18,952,247 |
تئودیسه یا عدل الهی | ||
| مجله پژوهش های فلسفی | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 14، شماره 30، 1399، صفحه 1-19 اصل مقاله (836.31 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jpiut.2019.34194.2349 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| شهین اعوانی* | ||
| دانشیار گروه فلسفه موسسه پژوهشی حکمت و فلسفه ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| بررسی تاریخ تحول تفکر فلسفی در غرب بیانگر آن است که از زمان افلاطون که خدای صانع (دمیورژ) با نظارة جهان معقول، جهان محسوس را به وجود آورد و گفت که خداوند نمی‌تواند بر برخی از ضرورت‌های طبیعی فائق آید؛ تا شروع قرن هفدهم، و پیدایش دیدگاه جدید انسان‌محور دکارت دربارة هستی، پیوسته یکی از موضوعات مشترک و پرسشی که برای اغلب فلاسفه در خلال مباحثی از قبیل چیستی و نحوة هستی خدا، جهان و انسان، مطرح بوده است، این پرسش‌هاست که: عدل چیست؟ آیا خدا عادل است؟ و آیا انسان به بهترین وجه خلق شده است؟ آیا جهان موجود، بهترین جهان ممکن است؟. تحلیل، توجیه یا هر گونه پاسخی به این مسأله از سوی فیلسوفان مسیحی پیش از لایب‌نیتس، اغلب صبغة کلامی داشته است. حتی در قرن پانزدهم هم این پرسش که چگونه اختیار انسان با علم پیشین و با مشیّت الهی سازگار است، محور مباحث فلسفی- کلامی است. پیشرفت علم و قوانین ضروری در علوم مختلف سبب شد که اختیار انسان خدشه‌دار شود. اسپینوزا و لایب‌نیتس هر یک به شیوة خاص خود در صدد برآمدند تا ثابت کنند که اختیار انسان و جبر علّی- معلولی علوم قابل جمع‌‌اند و خدا آنچه را که بیش از همه هماهنگی دارد، اراده می‌کند. موضوع تصور جهان به عنوان یک هماهنگی کلی پیشین‌بنیاد در آرای لایب‌نیتس (در قالب جوهر فرد یا مُناد) از جمله مطالبی است که در این مقاله مقدم بر بررسی چیستی و چرایی «بهترین جهان ممکن» مورد بررسی قرار خواهد گرفت. | ||
تازه های تحقیق | ||
For Leibniz, the human intellect can grasp the reality of pleasure and pain, joy, and sorrow, because they are based on inner experience, which itself is innate in man. In his treatise on "De rerum originatio radicali " (The Radical Origin of Things) elaborating on the existence of evil in the world, he maintains that the existence of evil is the necessary prerequisite for the realization of the highest and ultimate good. Evil no doubt is always accompanied by pain and the aftereffect of all kinds of evil, whether natural, moral, physical, or metaphysical is the various kinds of pain and suffering. Now, is the existence of metaphysical evil compatible with the accepted view in Christianity that God's providence and eternal will, shall save and redeem all human beings? In his Monadology (1714), Leibniz proves that to be the substance is equivalent to being a monad and hence the substance of God is the same as the "Divine monad". In his Theodicy again, he has endeavored to prove that the Divine attributes are "the primordial possibilities of all possible beings". In other words, they are the principal ideas. Infinite things are the delimitations of the infinite Divine attributes. Three among the infinite attributes of God are more worthy of attention: Knowledge (or Wisdom), Divine will (benevolence or the free choice of the good) and Divine power. All possible things, in Leibniz's view, have a relation to external reality. Each of them has an inner impulse or desire (conatus) for existence. The realization of such an innate impulse for existence, according to the Divine free choice, is conceivable only in those possibles which possess the highest degree of reality in relation to the whole. Stated in other terms, their existence should be harmonious and compatible with the existence of God and that of other possible beings, without the finite mind is capable to perceive the cause of such compatibility or its privation, because such perception requires the prior knowledge of the totality of a possible world. The actually present world is a contingent world, possible for it to exist or not to exist. Presently non-actual worlds are either impossible or that they are possible but as yet they have no sufficient reason to exist. The possible worlds, according to Leibniz are multifarious. God's choice of the best possible world demands the Divine volition, itself depending on the Divine intellect. The existence of the best possible world, in addition, requires a multiplicity of the world. In the Theodicy, Leibniz also tries to reconcile the Divine attributes of power (grace), knowledge (wisdom) and volition with the existence of the different kinds of evil which apparently contradict his benevolent teleology and presents a conclusive analysis of the concept of "free choice", itself a main ethical theme, and proves that this concept is univocally predicated of both God and man. The degree of the free choice of each monad, moreover, depends on the clearness and distinctness of its perceptions. Acts arising from clear and distinct perceptions are good, but on the contrary, if their determining causes are indistinct and confused, they become evil. "Sin" in Leibniz's view is an aftereffect of the confused perceptions. A section of this article is again assigned to a discussion about the idea of the "best possible world" in Leibniz, where the theory revolves upon such related issues as "the most possible variation", "the best possible order", and "the most possible perfection" in his philosophy. "Theodicy after Leibniz" constitutes another section of this article. The Theodicy of Leibniz became the groundwork for the German enlightenment. The eighteenth-century Germany was transformed into a sense into "the century of Divine justice" or "the century of theodicy". Reference is also made in this regard to the views of other philosophers such as Cassirer, Jaspers, Lessing, Schiller, Fichte, Hume, Wolff, and in particular Kant. The last part of the article is concerned with a discussion about the views of the opponents of Leibniz's Theodicy. Anti- theodicy, in no way, implies a sort of atheism or the absolute denial of the Divine justice. The adherents of this so-called "theory of protest" thesis have posed and addressed the following questions: "if God is an omnipotent being and the absolute Good, why is He indifferent with regard to the injustices, evils and the sufferings of this world?" John K. Roth (1940-), one of the theorists regarding this problem, in his "A Theodicy of Protest" denies the absolute and pure goodness of God, confirming at the same line His absolute omnipotence.
References
- Aawani, Shahin (2016); "Human Happiness in Plato's Viewpoint (Evaluation of Alcibiades and Philebus)", Sophia Perennis, IRIP.Vol. 28, 2015-2016, pp. 5- 26. - Copleston, Frederick Charles (1988); A History of Philosophy, vol. 7,( Fichte to Nietzsche) Persian translation by Dariush Ashuri; first ed. Tehran, Elmi - Farhangi Publishing Co. and Soroush Publishing Co. - Descartes, Rene: The philosophical Writings of Descartes (3 Vol.), Trans. By: J. Cottingham and R.Stoothof and D. Murdoch and A. Kenny/ CUP (U.S.A) 1984-91 [CSM] - Leibniz, G. W.: Die philosophischen Schriften, herausgegeben von C.J. Gerhardt, Berlin, 1875- 90 (GP).
| ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ئودیسه؛ عدل الهی؛ لایب‌نیتس؛ نظام اصلح؛ عالَم ممکن؛ شرّ؛ خیر | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
- Aawani, Shahin (2016); "Human Happiness in Plato's Viewpoint (Evaluation of Alcibiades and Philebus)", Sophia Perennis, IRIP.vol. 28, 2015-2016, pp. 5- 26. - Adams, Robert Merrihew and Reza Berenjkar (1995); "Should God Create the Best? A Discussion on Best Order", Kayhan-e Andishe, vol. 62, Sept. 1995, pp. 97-109. - Boutroux, Émil and others (1996); La Monadologie de Leibnitz, Persian translation by Yahya Mahdavi, first ed. Tehran, Kharazmi Publishing Co. 1996. - Brehier, Émile (2006); Histoire de la Philosophie, II, Le XVIIe siècle, Persian translation by Ismail Saadat, first ed. Tehran, Hermes Publishing. Co., 2006. - Cassirer, Ernst (1991); The Philosophy of Enlightenment (Die Philosophie der Aufklärung), Persian translation by Yadullah Muqin, Nilofar Publishing Co. - Copleston, Frederick Charles (1988); A History of Philosophy, vol. 7,( Fichte to Nietzsche) Persian translation by Dariush Ashuri; first ed. Tehran, Elmi - Farhangi Publishing Co. and Soroush Publishing Co. - Copleston, Frederick Charles (1996); History of Philosophy, vol. 4, Modern Philosophy, from Descartes to Leibnitz, Persian translation by Gholamreza Aavani, second ed. Tehran, Elmi Farhangi Publishing Co. - Copleston, Frederick Charles (1996); History of Philosophy, vol.6, Wolff to Kant, Persian translation by Ismail Saadat and Manouchehr Bozorgmehr, second ed. Tehran, Elmi - Farhangi Publishing Co. - CSM Descartes, R. - CSM→ Descartes, R. - Descartes, Rene: The philosophical Writings of Descartes (3 Vol.), Trans. by: J. Cottingham and R.Stoothof and D. Murdoch and A. Kenny/ CUP (U.S.A) 1984-91 [CSM] - Descartes, Rene: The philosophical Writings of Descartes (3 Vol.), Trans. by: J. Cottingham and R.Stoothof and D. Murdoch and A. Kenny/ CUP (U.S.A) 1984-91 [CSM]. - GP. (Gerhardt) Leibniz, 1875- 90. - GP. (Gerhardt)→ Leibniz, 1875- 90. - Hartmann, Nicolai: Die Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, Berlin/ New York, 1947. - Hartmann, Nicolai: Die Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, Berlin/ New York, 1947. - Hinske, N.: Kantsweg zur Transzendentalphilosophie, Stuttgart, 1970. - Hinske, N.: Kantsweg zur Transzendentalphilosophie, Stuttgart, 1970. - Hume, David (1981); The Natural History of Religion, Persian translation by Hamid Enayat, 3. ed., Tehran, Kharazmi Publishing Co. - Hume, David (2007)Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Cambridge University Press, - Jaspers, Karl (1978); Plato, Persian translation by Mohammad Hassan Loṭfi, first ed. Tehran, Kharazmi Publishing Co. - Jolley, Nicholas (2012); Leibniz, Persian translation by Massoud Hosseini, first ed. Tehran, Qoqnoos Publishing House. - Khatami, Mahmoud (2017); An Introduction to Malebranche's Philosophical Entrance, first ed., Tehran, Elm Pubishing, Co. - Latta, Robert (2005); The Philosophy of Leibniz, Persian translation by Fatemeh Minai, first ed., Tehran, Hermes Publishing Co. - Leibniz, G. W.: "The Principles of Nature and of Grace, Based on Reason", in: Loemker L. E. (ed.), Philosophical Papers and Letters, Springer, Dordrecht, 1989. - Leibniz, G. W.: "The Principles of Nature and of Grace, Based on Reason", in: Loemker L. E. (ed.), Philosophical Papers and Letters, Springer, Dordrecht, 1989. - Leibniz, G. W.: Die philosophischen Schriften, herausgegeben von C.J. Gerhardt, Berlin, 1875- 90 (GP). - Leibniz, G. W.: Die philosophischen Schriften, herausgegeben von C.J. Gerhardt, Berlin, 1875- 90 (GP). - Martin, Gottfried: Leibniz, Logik und Metaphysik, 2. Aufl., Walter de Gruyter, Berin, 1967. - Moein, Amrullah (2013); "A Comparison of the Views of Mu'tazilite and Leibniz on Divine Justice", in Journal of Comparative Theology, Fourth Year, No. 9, Spring and Summer, P. 105- 120. - Mojtahedi, Karim (2010); Leibniz and His Philosophical Commentators (Butro, Russell, Martin, Grove, Copleston, Moreau), first ed. Tehran, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. - Morris, Thomas V. (ed.)( 1987): The Concept of God, Oxford University Press,. - Parkinson, George Henry Radcliffe (2013); Routledge History of Philosophy, Vol. IV, The Renaissance and Seventeenth Century Rationalism, Persian translation by Seyyed Mostafa Shahraaini, first ed. Tehran, Hekamt publishing, Co. - Plantinga, Alvin (1995); "God, the possible worlds, and the problem of evil", in: Kalam- e Falsafi, collection of articles and translation, by Ahmad Naraqi and Ibrahim Soltani, first ed. Tehran, Șerat Cultural Institute. - Plantinga, Alvin (2005); God, Freedom, and Evil, Persian translation by Mohamad Saedi Mehr, first ed. Qum, Taha Publishing Co. - Rezai, Mahin (2004); Theodicy and Divine Justice, A Comparison between Leibniz and Motahari, second ed., Tehran, Sohrawardi Publications. - Ritter, Joachim (2007); Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Bd. 1 (Metaphysics), Persian translation group, Mohammad Reza Beheshti (editor), first ed. Tehran, Researching and Composing University Textbooks in the Humanities (SAMT). - Ritter, Joachim (ed.), (2011); Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Bd. 2 (Theleogie), Persian translation group, Mohammad Reza Beheshti and Bahman Pazoki (editors), first ed. Tehran, Iranian Research Institute of Philsophy (IRIP). - Roth, John K.( 2001): "A Theodicy od Protest", in: Encountering Evil: Live Options in Theodicy, edited by Stephan T. Davis, Louisville; Westminster/ John Knox Press,. - Rowe, William(2006): “Friendly Atheism, Skeptical Theism, and the Problem of Evil”, in: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. Vol.59. No 2.. p 79. - Sharifzadeh, Rahman (2012) "Plantinga and the Logical Problem of Evil", in: Jostarhay-e falsafeh-e Din, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, NO. 2. pp. 89- 103. - Solomon, Robert C., Higgins, Kathleen Marie (2016); Routledge History of Philosophy, Vol. VI, (The Age of German Idealism), Persian translation by Massoud Hosseini, first ed. Tehran, Hekamt Publishing Co. - Spinoza, Baruch (1982); Ethics, Persian translation by Mohsen Jahangiri, first ed. Tehran, University Publishing Center, 1982. - William Rowe(2007) Philosophy of Religion: An Introduction., Belmont: Wadsworth,. - Zakerzadeh, Abulqasim (2009); German Idealism, From Wolff to Neo Kantians, first ed. Abadan, Porsesh Publications. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,477 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 957 |
||