آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 43 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,224 |
| تعداد مقالات | 15,037 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 50,562,092 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,655,299 |
Establishing an Argument-Based Validity Approach for a Low-Stake Test of Collocational Behavior | ||
| Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 10، شماره 22، اسفند 2018، صفحه 27-48 اصل مقاله (610.83 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ali Darabi Bazvand* 1؛ Alireza Khoram2؛ Seyyed Ali Mirsalari3 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, University of Human Development, College of Languages, English Department, Kurdistan, Iraq | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University of Ramhormoz, Ramhormoz, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Most of the validation studies conducted across varying test application contexts are usually framed within the traditional conceptualization of validity and therefore lack a comprehensive framework to focus on test score interpretations and test score use. This study aimed at developing and validating a collocational behavior test (CBT), drawing on Kane's argument-based approach to validity. Four types of inferences including observation, generalization, extrapolation and explanation were articulated. To verify the validity assumptions, both theoretical and empirical evidence were presented within the formative and summative stages of test development and validation. Followed from Kane, theoretical evidence was sought through test specification, item construction, and test construction procedures. Empirical support, however, was sought through examining the collocational behavior test (CBT) with a sample of 60 university students majoring in TEFL. Ebel’s criteria, KR-21 reliability and a series of Pearson-Product correlation were applied to analyze the data for both theoretical and empirical phases. The findings refer to the support for the assumptions proposed for test validity, suggesting that the collocational behavior test(CBT)may provide an appropriate and accurate indicator of collocational language ability for EFL learners. The implications for language testing and assessment are discussed | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| collocational behavior؛ validity argument؛ theoretical evidence؛ empirical evidence | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdul Kadir, K. (2008). Framing a validity argument for test use and impact: Malaysian public service experience. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Almela, M. (2007). Words as “lexical units” in learning teaching vocabulary. International Journal of English Studies, 7(2), 21-40. Aryadoust, V. (2011).validity arguments of the speaking and listening modules of international English language testing system: A synthesis of existing research. Asian ESP Journal.7(2), 28-54. Bachman, L. F., (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bachman, L. F. (2005). Building and supporting a case for test use. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2(1), 1-34. Barfield, A. (2003). Collocation recognition and production: Research insights. Tokyo: Chuo University. Bonk, W.J. (2001). Testing ESL learners’ knowledge of collocations. In T. Hudson &J. D. Brown (Eds.), A focus on language test development: expanding the language proficiency construct across a variety of tests. (Technical eport#21). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, (pp. 113-142). Chapelle, C. A. (1994). Are C-tests valid measures for L2 vocabulary research? Second Language Research, 10(2), 157-187. Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. (2004). Issues in developing a TOEFL validity argument: Paper presented at the 26th Annual Language Testing Research Colloquium, Temecula, CA. Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. (2007a). (Where) is the construct in an Interpretive Argument? Paper presented at the 29th Annual Language Testing Research Colloquium, Barcelona, Spain. Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. (2007b). From validation research to a validity argument. Paper presented at the 4th European Association for Language Testing and Assessment Conference, Sitges, Spain. Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. E., & Jamieson, J. (Eds.) (2008). Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language. London: Routledge. Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. E., & Jamieson, J. (2010). Does an argument-based approach to validity make a difference? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 29(1), 3- 13. Chapelle, C. A., & Read, J. (2001). A framework for vocabulary assessment. Language Testing, 18(1), 1-32. Cronbach, L. J. (.1971). Validity. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed., pp. 443-597). Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (2007). Language testing and assessment: An advanced resource book. Oxford, UK: Routledge. House, E. R. (1980). Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE. Jaen, M.M. (2007). A corpus-driven design of a test for assessing the ESL collocational competence of university students. International journal of English Studies, 7(2), 127- 147. Kane, M. T. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 527-535. Kane, M. T. (2001). Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 319-342. Kane, M. (2002). Validating high-stakes testing programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21(1), 31-41. Kane, M. (2006). Validation. In R. Brennen (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed.), (pp. 17-64). Westport, CT: Greenwood. Kane, M. T. (2006a). Content-related validity evidence. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 131–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Kane, M. T. (2006b). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 17- 64). American Council on Education/Praeger. Kane, M.T.(2011).Validating score interpretations and uses. Language Testing, 29(1) 3– 17 Keshavarz, M. H. & Salimi, H. (2007). Collocational competence and cloze test performance: A study of Iranian EFL learners, 17(1), 81-92. Le, H.T. (2011). Developing a validity argument for the English placement Fall 2010 Listening test at Iowa State University, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Iowa State University. McNamara, T. F., &Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13 103). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2003). On the structure of educational assessment. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1, 3-62. Mochizuki, M. (2002). Exploration of two aspects of vocabulary knowledge: Paradigmatic and collocational. Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan, 13, 121- 129. Park, J. (2012). Developing and Validating an Instrument to Measure College Students’ Inferential Reasoning in Statistics: An Argument-Based Approach to Validation. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota. Pawley, A., &Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native like selection and native like fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191-226). New York, NY: Longman. Qian, D. &Schedl, M. (2004). Evaluation of an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for assessing reading performance. Language Testing, 21(1), 28-52. Johnson, R.C &Riazi, M.(2013). Assessing the assessments: Using an argument-based validity framework to assess the validity and use of an English placement system in a foreign language context. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 2(1), 31-58. Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument (updated edition). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Voss, E. (2012). A validity argument for score meaning of a computer-based ESL academic collocational ability test based on a corpus-driven approach to test design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University. Widdowson, H. G., (2007). Discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 647 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,266 |
||