آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 731 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,952 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 9,729,125 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,200,223 |
Kant and Hegel on Aesthetic Reflexivity | ||
| مجله پژوهش های فلسفی دانشگاه تبریز | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 12، شماره 24، پاییز 1397، صفحه 95-113 اصل مقاله (397 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| جرج و. برترام | ||
| استاد فلسفه، دانشگاه FU برلین آلمان | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The paper aims at reevaluating a conception of the aesthetic that was developed by Kant and Hegel but that has been widely neglected due to the fact that their positions in aesthetics have been wrongly considered to be antagonistic to one another. The conception states that the aesthetic is a practice of reflecting on other human practices. Kant was the first to articulate this conception, but nevertheless falls short of giving a satisfying account of it, as he doesn’t succeed in explaining its objective aspect. I claim that Hegel resolves this problem by understanding works of art as objects that thermalize essential orientations of historical-cultural practices. But his explanation fails to grasp the specificity of art as a reflective practice. However, Hegel’s position gives us a hint for how to deal with this problem: Reflection has to be understood in a practical, and not in a cognitive sense. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Aesthetic Reflexivity؛ practice؛ Hegel and Kant | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Kant and Hegel on Aesthetic Reflexivity | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Georg W. Bertram | ||
| Professor of Philosophy, FU Berlin, Germany | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The paper aims at reevaluating a conception of the aesthetic that was developed by Kant and Hegel but that has been widely neglected due to the fact that their positions in aesthetics have been wrongly considered to be antagonistic to one another. The conception states that the aesthetic is a practice of reflecting on other human practices. Kant was the first to articulate this conception, but nevertheless falls short of giving a satisfying account of it, as he doesn’t succeed in explaining its objective aspect. I claim that Hegel resolves this problem by understanding works of art as objects that thermalize essential orientations of historical-cultural practices. But his explanation fails to grasp the specificity of art as a reflective practice. However, Hegel’s position gives us a hint for how to deal with this problem: Reflection has to be understood in a practical, and not in a cognitive sense. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Aesthetic Reflexivity, practice, Hegel and Kant | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
- Allison, Henry (2001), Kant’s Theory of Taste (Cambridge University Press).
- Beardsley, Monroe C. (1981) Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism (2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 1981).
- Danto, Arthur C. (1981) The Transfiguration of the Commonplace (Harvard University Press, 1981).
- Dickie, George (1974) Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis (Cornell University Press,).
- Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1987) The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays, ed. by Robert Bernasconi (Cambridge University Press).
- Ginsborg, Hannah (1990) “Reflective Judgment and Taste,” in: Noûs 24, pp. 63-78.
- Guyer, Paul (1979) Kant and the Claims of Taste (Cambridge University Press).
- Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1975), Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, trans. T. M. Knox, vol. I (Oxford: Clarendon).
- Henrich, Dieter (1971) “Self-consciousness, a Critical Introduction to a Theory,” Man and World 4:1, pp. 3-28.
- Kant, Immanuel,(1999) Critique of Judgment, trans. P. Guyer and A. Wood (Cambridge University Press).
- Menke, Christoph (1999), the Sovereignty of Art: Aesthetic Negativity in Adorno and Derrida (Cambridge: MIT Press).
- Moran, Richard,(2001) Authority and Estrangement (Princeton University Press).
- Pinkard, Terry,(2007) “Symbolic, Classical, and Romantic Art,” in Hegel and the Arts, ed. Stephen Houlgate (Northwestern University Press,) pp. 3-28.
- Pippin, Robert B.(2014), After the Beautiful: Hegel and the Philosophy of Pictorial Modernism (University of Chicago Press,).
- Pippin, Robert B., (2008) “The Absence of Aesthetics in Hegel’s Aesthetics,” in The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth Century Philosophy, ed. F. Beiser (Cambridge University Press,), pp. 394-418.
- Seel, Martin,(2004)Aesthetics of Appearing (Stanford University Press).
- Weitz, Moritz, (1953) “The Role of Theory in Aesthetics,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62, pp. 27-35.
- Zuckert, Rachel, (2007)“Kant’s Rationalist Aesthetics,” Kant-Studien 98: 443-463 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 426 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 156 |
||
