آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 701 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,484 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 9,312,133 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,706,038 |
Mulla Sadra and Hume on Comparative Analyzing of Causality | ||
| مجله پژوهش های فلسفی دانشگاه تبریز | ||
| مقاله 13، دوره 12، شماره 24، پاییز 1397، صفحه 241-257 اصل مقاله (500 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| قدرت الله قربانی | ||
| دانشیار فلسفه، دانشگاه خوارزمی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| One of the most important causes for comparative studying on philosophical systems is to find their commonalities for responding common questions and to emphasize on their differences for taking functional answers encountering modern philosophical challenges and problems. Here, causality is chosen as the case study. Causality is of the basic philosophical issues that have been continually considered by both Islamic and Western philosophical traditions, but the answers which have been rendered by modern western philosophers with empirical approach and Muslim philosophers, like Mulla Sadra, with intellectual and intuitive approach, is necessitated to compare such answers and clarify the efficacy of each one towards the other one. Mulla Sadra’s philosophical, intellectual and illuminative thought in Islamic tradition, in comparison to Hume’s modern empirical and phenomenal tendencies, is able to remove fundamental ahead problems concerning causality and to answer skepticism derived from it. In Mulla Sadra’s Transcendent Wisdom, since the whole system of being has its plural hierarchical universes in which there are causal longitudinal relations. In fact, for Mulla Sadra, causality is not merely restricted to the natural world, and our phenomenal knowledge about it is inadequate, but whatever we see in the natural world is only the weak and thin level or surface of the deep and fundamental reality of causality. Meantime, for Mulla Sadra, in such the causal relation, the effect has nothing and no reality except it is as the manifestation, shadow and act of the cause. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Causality؛ being؛ Transcendent Wisdom؛ Empiricism؛ intuition | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Mulla Sadra and Hume on Comparative Analyzing of Causality | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Qodratullah Qorbani | ||
| Associate Professor of Philosophy, Kharazmi University- Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| One of the most important causes for comparative studying on philosophical systems is to find their commonalities for responding common questions and to emphasize on their differences for taking functional answers encountering modern philosophical challenges and problems. Here, causality is chosen as the case study. Causality is of the basic philosophical issues that have been continually considered by both Islamic and Western philosophical traditions, but the answers which have been rendered by modern western philosophers with empirical approach and Muslim philosophers, like Mulla Sadra, with intellectual and intuitive approach, is necessitated to compare such answers and clarify the efficacy of each one towards the other one. Mulla Sadra’s philosophical, intellectual and illuminative thought in Islamic tradition, in comparison to Hume’s modern empirical and phenomenal tendencies, is able to remove fundamental ahead problems concerning causality and to answer skepticism derived from it. In Mulla Sadra’s Transcendent Wisdom, since the whole system of being has its plural hierarchical universes in which there are causal longitudinal relations. In fact, for Mulla Sadra, causality is not merely restricted to the natural world, and our phenomenal knowledge about it is inadequate, but whatever we see in the natural world is only the weak and thin level or surface of the deep and fundamental reality of causality. Meantime, for Mulla Sadra, in such the causal relation, the effect has nothing and no reality except it is as the manifestation, shadow and act of the cause. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Causality, being, Transcendent Wisdom, Empiricism, intuition | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
- Copleston, Fredrick (1991), History of Philosophy, Vol.5, Trans by Amir Jalaluddin A’alam, Tehran, Elmi and Farhangi Press.
- Emmanuel. M. Steven, (2001), Modern Philosophers, New York, Black well press.
- Hume, David (1969), A Treatise of Human Nature, Penguin Book.
- Hume, David (1988), Enquiry Concerning Understanding, Open Court.
- Ibrahimi Dinani, Gholam Hossein (1993), Philosophical Universal Rules in Islamic Philosophy, Vol.2, Tehran, Institute for Humanities & Cultural Studies.
- Mulla Sadra, Sadrudin Muhammad (1999), Asfar, Trans by Muhammad Khajavi, Tehran, Mowla Press.
- Mulla Sara, Sadruddin Muhammad (1996), Al Shavahed Al Roboubyieh, Trans by Javad Mosleh, Tehran, Soroush Press.
- Tbatabaei, Muhammad Hossein (1993), The Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism, with Martyr Mutahhati’s Illustrations, Tehran, Sadra Press.
- Tbatabaei, Muhammad Hossein (1994), Nihayah Al Hikmah, Qom, Jame’h Modarresin Press. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 101 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 31 |
||
