آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,497 |
| تعداد مقالات | 18,257 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 59,161,735 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 20,614,398 |
How DoesStrawson Unify Epistemology, Ontology and Logic | ||
| مجله پژوهش های فلسفی | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 6، شماره 11، آبان 1391، صفحه 1-14 اصل مقاله (181.06 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| محمدرضا عبدالله نژاد* | ||
| استادیار گروه فلسفه، دانشگاه تبریز | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Strawson’s conception of analysis as a ‘connective linguistic analysis’ makes it possible for him to achieve an indefinitely large range of ideas or concepts among them are certain numbers of fundamental, general and pervasive concepts or concept-types which not only are pre-theoretical or ahistorical, but also together constitute a structural framework only within whichlogic, ontology and epistemology is possible. He takes it as a foundation for this conclusion that logic, ontology and epistemology are three aspects of one unified enquiry (or trio)and strengthensit by this assertion thatwe can understand this unity through considering the fundamental operation of our language. In this paper, after tracing the line of development of Strawson’s philosophical idea of the trio and specifying the fundamental operation of our language (or the common thread which makes this unity possible), we stipulate that it is by means of ‘connective linguistic analysis’ that Strawsonwas able to unify epistemology, ontology and logic. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Strawson؛ logic؛ Epistemology؛ Ontology؛ Trio؛ connective linguistic Analysis | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Avramides, Anita. (2001). Other Minds. USA & Canada: Routledge. Hacker, P.M.S. (1998). ‘Analytic Philosophy: What, Whence, and Whither?’ In Biletzki, Anat & Matar, Anat (eds.) The Story of Analytic Philosophy. London & New York: Routledge. Pp. 3-34 Kant, Immanuel. (1964). Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. N. Kemp Smith. London: Macmillan. Kaplan, David. (1970). ‘What is Russell’s Theory of Descriptions?’ In Yourgrau and Beck (eds.) Physics, Logic and History. New York: Plenum Press. Moore, G. E. (1955). ‘Wittgenstein’s Lectures in 1930-33’, Mind. vol. LXIV: 13-14. Ramsey, F. P. (2007). Foundations of Mathematics. London & New York: VDM Publishing. Russell, Bertrand. (1905). ‘On Denoting’. Mind. vol. 14: 479-93. Schlick, Moritz. (1949). ‘Meaning and Verification.’ In Feigl & Sellars (eds.) Reading in Philosophical Analysis. Hardcover: Ridgeview Pub Co. Senderowicz, Yaron M. (2005). The Coherence of Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. Netherlands: Springer. Snowdon, P. F. (2001). ‘P.F. Strawson’. In A.P. Martinich & David Sosa (eds.) Blackwell Companions to Philosophy: A Companion to Analytic Philosophy. Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Strawson, P.F. (1950). ‘On Referring’. Mind. New Series, vol. 59 (no. 235). Strawson, P.F. (1952). Introduction to Logical Theory. London: Methuen. Strawson, P.F. (1959). Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London & New York: Routledge. Strawson, P.F. (1966). The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. London & New York: Routledge. Strawson, P. F. (1974a). ‘Self, Mind and Body’. Common Factor. vol. 4. Reprinted in FR. Strawson, P. F. (1974b). Subject and Predicate in Logic and Grammar. London: Methuen. Strawson, P. F. (1985). Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties. London: Methuen. Strawson, P. F. (1992). Analysis and Metaphysics: An Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stroud, Barry. (2000). Understanding Human Knowledge: Philosophical Essays. New York: Oxford University Press. Sultana, Mark. (2006). Self Deception & Akrasia: A Comparative Conceptual Analysis. Room: E.P.U.G. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 6,512 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,244 |
||