آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 719 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,752 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 9,487,136 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,940,874 |
تأثیر بیوچارهای کاه برنج و خرده چوب نراد بر ویژگیهای شیمیایی خاک شور- سدیمی با بافت لوم رسی | ||
| دانش آب و خاک | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 27، شماره 4، زمستان 1396، صفحه 49-61 اصل مقاله (1258 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مائده پریچهر* 1؛ فردین صادق زاده2؛ محمد علی بهمنیار3؛ مهدی قاجار سپانلو4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد شیمی و حاصلخیزی خاک، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری | ||
| 2استادیار گروه علوم خاک، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری | ||
| 3استاد گروه علوم خاک، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری | ||
| 4دانشیار گروه علوم خاک، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری | ||
| چکیده | ||
| باتوجه به ناکافی بودن زمینهای مناسب کشاورزی در جهان و قابل توجه بودن وسعت اراضی شور- سدیمی، اصلاح این خاکها حائز اهمیت میباشد. بررسیها نشان میدهد که کاربرد بایوچار در خاک، منجر به بهبود کیفیت خاک، افزایش بازده محصول و کاهش تنشهای مربوط به شوری میشود. در این پژوهش تأثیر افزودن بیوچارهای مختلف بر برخی ویژگیهای شیمیایی، از جمله غلظت کاتیونها و آنیونهای محلول خاک شور- سدیمی با بافت لوم رسی تهیه شده از منطقه کرفون واقع در استان مازندران، مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. بیوچارهای مختلف از بقایای کشاورزی (کاه برنج) و ضایعات کارخانه چوب (چوب نراد) در دمای300 درجه سلیسیوس بهصورت ساده و اسیدی تهیه شدند و در سه سطح (0، 5/2 و 5 درصد) به یک خاک شور- سدیمی افزوده شدند. نتایج نشان داد که کاربرد بیوچار کاه برنج موجب کاهش بیشتر pH خاک نسبت به بیوچار حاصل از نراد گردید. همچنین کاربرد بیوچار نراد در خاک موجب کاهش هدایت الکتریکی، نسبت جذب سدیم و میزان سدیم، پتاسیم، کلسیم و کلرید در محلول خاک شد؛ در حالیکه بیوچار کاه برنج، بیوچار کاه برنج اسیدی و بیوچار نراد اسیدی باعث افزایش شاخصها و عناصر مذکور شدند. نتایج نشان داد در صورتیکه آبشوئی املاح و زهکشی صورت نپذیرد، فقط میتوان بیوچار ضایعات چوب نراد را به خاک شور- سدیمی اضافه نمود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| بیوچار؛ خاک شور- سدیمی؛ ویژگیهای شیمیایی؛ کاه برنج؛ نراد | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effects of Rice Straw and Dicer Biochars on Chemical Characteristics of Clay-Loam, Saline-Sodic Soil | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| M parichehre1؛ F SadeghZadeh2؛ M A Behmanyar3؛ M Ghajar Sepanlu4 | ||
| 1M.Sc. Student of Chemical Engineering and Soil Fertility, Sari Univ. of Agri. Sci. and Natural Resources, Iran | ||
| 2Assist. Prof, of Soil Science Dept. Sari Univ. of Agri. Sci. and Natural Resources, Iran | ||
| 3Prof. of Soil Science Dept. Sari Univ. of Agri. Sci. and Natural Resources, Iran | ||
| 4Assoc. Prof, of Soil Science Dept. Sari Univ. of Agri. Sci. and Natural Resources, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Due to the insufficient suitable agricultural land and the large extent of saline-sodic soil across the world, the reclamation of the salt affected soils is necessary. Studies indicate that the addition of biochars to the soils improves their qualities, increases crop yield, and reduces salinity stresses. In the present study, the effects of adding various biochars on some chemical characteristics, including the concentration of soluble cations and anions of saline-sodic soil with clay-loam texture, which was taken from the Kafoun region in Mazandaran province, were investigated. Several kinds of simple and acidic biochars were produced from agricultural residues (rice straw) and wood factory waste (dicer) at 300 ° C and added to saline-sodic soil in three levels 0, (2.5, and 5%). The results showed that the rice straw biochar reduced the soil pH more than the biochar obtained from dicer. It was also understood that dicer biochar reduced the amount of soil EC, SAR, soluble sodium, potassium, calcium, and chloride. However, the rice straw biochar, acidic rice straw biochar, and acidic dicer biochar increased the amounts of those criteria and elements. Ultimately, it can be concluded that only the dicer biochar should be added to saline- sodic soil, in the absence of leaching and drainage. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Biochar, Chemical Characteristics, Dicer, Rice straw, Saline-sodic soil | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abel S, Peters A, Trinks S, Schonsky H, Facklam M and Wessolek G, 2013. Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil. Geoderma 202-203: 183-191.
Akhtar SS, Andersen MN and Liu F, 2015a. Biochar Mitigates Salinity Stress in Potato. Journal of Agrronomy and Crop Science 201(5): 368-378.
Akhtar SS, Andersen MN and Liu F, 2015b. Residual effects of biochar on improving growth, physiology and yield of wheat under salt stress. Agricultural Water Management 158: 61-68.
Anonymous, 2007. Statistix-8 and User Guide for the Plant Material Programm.Version2. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Anonymous, 2012. Standardized Product Definition and Product Testing Guidelines for Biochar that is Used in Soil. International Biochar Initiative. http://www.biochar-international.org.
Barzegar A, Ali Mohammadi M, and Naseri A, 2002. Effect of different treatments on leaching of southern Ahwaz saline- sodic soil spots using a physical model. Scientific Journal of Agriculture, 25(1): 89-103 (In Persian).
Barzegar A, 2008. Saline- sodic soils: recognition and productivity. Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz Publications (In Persian).
Chaganti VN, crohn DM and Simunek J, 2015. Leaching and reclamation of biochar and compost amended saline-sodic soil with moderate SAR reclaimed water. Agricultural Water Management 158: 255-265.
Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A and Joseph S, 2007. Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Austrailian Journal of Soil Research 45: 629-634.
Curtin D and Miller JJ, 2008. Electrical conductivity and soluble ions. Pp. 161-171. In: Carter MR and Gregorich EG (eds). Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Chapter 2- Diagnostic methods for soil and environmental management. Taylor & Francis.
Elias Azar Kh, 2002. Reclamation of saline- sodic soil (Soil and water management). Urmia University Press (In Persian).
Frankenberger WT, Jr, Tabatabai MA, Adriano DC and Doner HE, 1996. Bromine, chlorine, and fluorine. Pp. 833-868. In: Helmke PA, Johnston CT, Loeppert RH, Page AL, Soltanpour PN, Sparks DL, Sumner ME and Tabatabai MA (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis. part 3- Chemical Methods. Madison. Wisconsin. USA.
Fuchs M, Garcia-Perez M, Small P, Flora G, 2014.Campfire Lessons - breaking down the combustion process to understand biochar production. the Biochar Journal. Arbaz, Switzerland. https://www.biochar-journal.org/en/ct/47.
Gaskin JW, Speir RA, Harris K, Das KC, Lee RD, Morris LA and Fisher DS, 2010. Effect of peanut hull and pine chip biochar on soil nutrients, corn nutrient status, and yield. Journal of Agronomy 102: 623-633.
Gee GW and Bauder J, 1982. Particle size analysis. Pp. 384–412. In: Keeney DR, Miller AL and Page AL (eds). Method of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Madison. Wisconsin.
Guo M and Song W, 2012. Quality variations of poultry litter biochar generated at different pyrolysis temperatures. Journal of Analytical and Applied pyrolysis 94: 138-145.
Hamblin AP, 1981. Filter-paper method for routine measurement of field water potential. Journal of Hydrology 53: 355-360.
Helmke PA and Sparks DL, 1996. Lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, and cesium. Pp.551-574. In: Helmke PA, Johnston CT, Loeppert RH, Page AL, Soltanpour PN, Sparks DL, Sumner ME and Tabatabai MA (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis. part 3- Chemical Methods. Madison. Wisconsin. USA.
Huber S, Prokop G, Arrouays D, Banko G, Bispo A, Jones RJA, Kibblewhite M, Lexer W, Moller A, Rickson RJ, Shishkov T, Stephens M, Toth G, Van den Akker J, Varallyay G and Verheijen F, 2008. Environmental Assessment of Soil for Monitoring: Volume I Indicators & Criteria. EUR 23490 EN/1. Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg. 339pp.
Jones RJA,Verheijen FGA, Reuter HI and Jones AR, 2008. Environmental Assessment of Soil for Monitoring Volume V: Procedures & Protocols. EUR 23490 EN/5, Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 165p.
Karer J, Zehetner F, Kloss S, Wimmer B and Soja G, 2013. Biochar application to temperate soils: effect on nutrient uptake and corn yield under field conditions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 22: 390-403.
Laird DA, Fleming P, Davis DD, Horton R, Wang B and Karlen DL, 2010. Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158(3): 443-449.
Lal R, 2011. Sequestering carbon in soils of agro-ecosystems. Food Policy 36: S33-S39.
Larid DA, 2008. The charcoal vision: a win-win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permanently sequestring carbon, while improving soil and water quality. Agronomy Journal 100(1): 178-181.
Lehmann J, da Silva JP, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W and Glaser B, 2003. Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant and Soil 249: 343-357.
Lehmann J, Gaunt J and Rondon M, 2006. Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems-A review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11: 403-427.
Lehmann J, 2007. Bio-energy in the black. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. The Ecological Society of America. 5(7): 381-387.
Lehmann J and Joseph S, 2009. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and technology. Earthscan, UK. 448p.
Masulili A, Utomo WH and Syechfani MS, 2010. Rice husk biochar for rice based cropping system in acid soil 1. The characteristics of rice husk biochar and its influence on the properties of acid sulfate soils and rice growth in west Kalimantan, Indonesia. Journal of Agricultural Science 2: 39-47.
Nabizadeh S, 2016. Leaching of Methylene blue and Direct blue 71 in a soil amended with biochar. Thesis for Master’s degree in soil science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources university (In Persian).
Nelson DW and Sommers LE, 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. Pp. 539-579. In: Keeney DR, Miller AL and Page AL (eds). Method of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chimical and Microbiological Propertir. Second edition. American Society of Agronomy. Madison. Wisconsin.
Parichehre M, SadeghZadeh F, Bahmanyar A, Ghajar Sepanlu M, 2016. Production of suitable biochar for use in saline soil. Pp 1-7. Proceedings of the 2nd National Conference on Conservation of Natural Resources and the Environment. 12- 13 March, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardebil, Iran (In Persian).
Rajkovich S, Enders A, Hanely K, Hyland C, Zimmerman Ar and Lehmann J, 2012. Corn growth and nitrogen nutrition after additions of biochars with varying properties to a temperate soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 48(3): 271-284.
Richards LA, 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali Soils. In: Anonymous (eds). Agricultural Handbook No.60. U.S. Salinity Laboratory, Chapter 1. Origin and Nature of Saline and Alkali Soils. Riverside, California.
Rondon MA, Lehmann J, Ramírez J and Hurtado M, 2007. Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with biochar additions. Biology and Fertility of Soils 43: 699–708.
Rutigliano FA, Romano M, Marzaioli R, Baglivo I, Baronti F, Miglietta F and Castaldi S, 2014. Effect of biochar addition on soil microbial community in a wheat crop. European Journal of soil Biology 60:9-15.
Sohi SP, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E and Bol R, 2010. A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Advances in Agronomy 105: 47-82.
Steiner Ch, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Nehls Th, Macedo JLVD, Blum WEH and Zech W, 2007. Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil 291: 275-290.
Thomas SC, Frye S, Gale N, Garmon M, Launchbury R, Machado N, Melamed S, Murray J, Petroff A and Winsborough C, 2013. Biochar mitigates negative effects of salt additions on two herbaceous plant species. Journal of Environmental Management 129: 62-68.
Tsai WT, Liu SC, Chen HR, Chang YM and Tsai YL, 2012. Textural and chemical properties of swine-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use as a soil amendment. Chemosphere 89(2): 198-203.
Verheijen F, Jeffery S, Bastos AC, Van der Velde M and Diafas I, 2010. Biochar application to soils- A critical scientific review of effects on soil properties, Processes and Functions. European Commission. 162p.
Zameni L, 2016, Nitrate leaching in a soil amended with biochar and Fe-coated biochar. Thesis for Master’s degree in soil science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources university (In Persian).
Zhang A, Bian R, Pan G, Cui L, Hussain Q, Li L, Zheng JI, Zheng Ju, Zhang X, Han X and Yu X, 2012. Effects of biochar amendment on soil quality, crop yield and greenhouse gas emission in a chinese rice paddy: A field study of 2 consecutive rice growing cycles. Field Crops Research 127: 153-160.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 245 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 430 |
||
