اهمیت اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ و محیط بر آنالیز ژنتیکی میزان تولید شیر درگاوهای هلشتاین

Boettcher P, Fatehi J and Schutz M, 2003. Genotype by environment interactions in conventional versus pasture-based dairies in Canada. Journal of Dairy Science 86:383-389.

Bohlouli M and Alijani S, 2012. Genotype by environment interaction for milk production traits in Iranian Holstein dairy cattle using random regression model. Livestock Research for Rural Development 24:7-15.

Bohlouli, M, Shodja J and Alijani S, 2013. Investigation of interaction between genotype and production level in Iranian Holstein dairy cattle using test day records. Journal of Ruminant Research 1: 93-108.

Buenger A, Ducrocq V and Swalve HH, 2001. Analysis of survival in dairy cows with supplementary data on type scores and housing systems from a region of northwest Germany. Journal of Dairy Sci 84:1531-1541.

Carabaño MJ, Wade KM and Vanvleck LD, 1990. Genotype by environment interactions for milk and fat production across regions of the United-States. Journal of Dairy Science 73:173-180.

Ceron- Munoz MF, 2004. Factors that cause genotype by environment interaction and use of a multipletrait herd-cluster model for milk yield of Holstein cattle from Brazil and Colombia. Journal of Dairy Science 87:2687-2692.

Cienfuegos-Rivas EG, Oltenacu PA, Blake RW, Schwager SJ, Castillo-Juarez H and Ruiz FJ, 1999. Interaction between milk yield of Holstein cows in Mexico and the United States. Journal of Dairy Science 82:2218-2223.

Cooper M and DeLacy IH, 1994. Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotypic variation and genotype-by-environment interaction in plant breeding multi environment experiments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88:561-572

Costa CN, 2000. Genetic analysis of Holstein cattle populations in Brazil and the United States. Journal of Dairy Science 83:2963-2974.

Cromie AR, 1999. Genotype by environment interaction for milk production traits in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle in Ireland PhD Thesis, Queens University of Belfast, Belfast, Ireland.

Dimov G, 1995. Variance of interaction effects of sires and herd for yield traits of Holsteins in California, New York, and Pennsylvania with an animal model. Journal of Dairy Science 78:939-946.

Dong MC and Mao IL, 1990. Heterogeneity of (co)variance and heritability in different levels of intraherd milk production variance and of herd average. Journal of Dairy Science 73:843-851.

Fatehi J, Stella S, Shannon JJ and Boettcher PJ, 2003. Genetic parameters for feet and leg traits evaluated in different environments. Journal of Dairy Science 86:661-666.

Hill WG, Edwards MR, Ahmed MKA and Thompson R, 1983. Heritability of milk yield and composition at different levels and variability of production. Animal Production 36:59-69.

Keady TWJ, Mayne CS, Fitzpatrick DA and McCoy MA, 2001. Effect of concentrate feed level in late gestation on subsequent milk yield, milk composition, and fertility of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 84:1468-1479.

Kolmodin R, Strandberg E, Danell B and Jorjani H, 2004. Reaction norms for protein yield and days open in Swedish red and white dairy cattle in relation to various environmental variables. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A-Anim Science 54:139-151.

Kolmodin R, Strandberg E, Madsen P, Jensen J and Jorjani H, 2002. Genotype by environment interaction in Nordic dairy cattle studied using reaction norms. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A-Anim Science 52:11-24.

Kolver ES, 2002. Total mixed rations versus pasture diets: evidence for a genotype x diet interaction in dairy cow performance. Proceeding of New Zealand Society of Anim Production62:246-251.

Mathur PK, 2002. Methods for estimation and use of genotype-environment interactions. 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, August 19-23. Montpellier, France.

Mathur PK and Horst P, 1994. Genotype by environment interactions in laying hens based on relationship between breeding values of sires in temperate and tropical environments. Poultry Science 73:1777-1784.

Meyer K, 1987. Estimates of variances due to sire x herd interactions and environmental covariances between paternal half-sibs for first lactation dairy production. Livestock Production Science 17:95-115.

Moradi Shahrbabak, M, Saghi DA and Miraee SR, 2004. Adaptation of Holstein cows in Iranian environmental condition. Journal of Iranian Agricultural Science 37: 51-59.

Mulder HA, 2007. Methods to optimize livestock breeding programs with genotype by environment interaction and genetic heterogeneity of environmental variance. PhD thesis: Wageningen University (The Netherlands).

Mulder HA, Groen AF, De Jong G and Bijma P, 2004. Genotype x environment interaction for yield and somatic cell score with automatic and conventional milking systems. Journal of Dairy Science 87:1487-1495.

Nauta WJ, Baars T and Bovenhui H, Converting to organic dairy farming: Consequences for production, somatic cell scores and calving interval of first parity Holstein cows. Livestock Production Science (in press).

Pryce JE, Nielsen BL, Veerkamp RF and Simm G, 1999. Genotype and feeding system effects and interactions for health and fertility traits in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 57:193-201.

Rekaya R, Weigel KA and Gianola D, 2001. Application of structural model for genetic covariances in International dairy sire evaluations. Journal of Dairy Science 84:1525-1530.

Saghi, DA, 2004. Adaptation in Iranian environmental condition. M. sc. Thesis, University of Tehran, Tehran.

Salimi, F, Moradi Shahrbabak M and Rahimi A, 2006. the performance of imported Holstein bulls for production traits in Iranian different climate. Journal of Agricultural Science and natural Resourses 15: 75-81.

Simm G, Veerkamp RF and Persaud P, 1994. The economic-performance of dairy-cows of different predicted genetic merit for milk solids production. Animal Production Science 58:313-320.

Stanton TL, Blake RW, Quaas RL, Van Vleck LD and Carabano MJ, 1991.Genotype by environment interaction for Holestein milk yield in Colombia, Mexico, and Puerto Rico. Journal of Dairy Science 74:1700-1714.

Stratton DA, 1998. Reaction norm functions and QTL-environment interactions for flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 81:144-155.

Tong AKW, Kennedy BW and Moxley JE, 1977. Sire by herd interaction for milk yield and composition traits. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 57:383.

Veerkamp R F, Simm G and Oldham JD, 1994. Effects of interaction between genotype and feeding system on milk-production, feed-intake, efficiency and body tissue mobilization in dairy-cows. Livestock Production Science 39:229-241.

Veerkamp RF, Simm G and Oldham JD, 1995. Genotype by environment interactions: experience from Langhill. Pages 59-66 in Breeding and Feeding the High Genetic Merit Dairy Cow. British Society Anim Science Occas Publication 19.

Wicks HCF and Leaver JD, Influence of genetic merit and environment on somatic cell counts of Holstein-Friesian cows. Veterinary Journal (in press).

Yaeghoobi R, Roshanfekr H, Mamooee M, Fayazi J, Ashayerizadeh A, Bojarpour M and BeigiNasiri MT, 2009. Genotype by Environmental Interactions for Milk and Fat Production across Western Provinces of Iran. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8(11). 2110-2114.