آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,553 |
| تعداد مقالات | 18,934 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 63,565,032 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 23,270,213 |
Bridging Theory and Practice: Supervisors’ Professional Knowledge and Feedback Styles in Post-Observation Briefings in Iranian English Language Institutes. | ||
| Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
| مقاله 22، دوره 18، شماره 37، مهر 2026، صفحه 423-438 اصل مقاله (514.56 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2026.73164.2878 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mitra Peydaei-Niyazi* 1؛ Hooshang Khoshsima2؛ Nahid Yarahmadzehi2 | ||
| 1TEFL Department, Humanity Faculty, Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar, Iran | ||
| 2Management and Humanities Faculty Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar, IRAN | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The supervision process in the Iranian EFL context has mainly been conducted in a directive style, neglecting the need for collaboration and teachers' professional development. Although literature has emphasized the need for professional development of supervisors, the relationship between such an activity and providing constructive feedback for teachers still needs clarification. This convergent parallel mixed-methods case study explored patterns of co-occurrence between supervisors’ self-reported updating bands and predominant feedback styles in 36 briefing sessions with teachers across English language institutes in Tehran. Through thematic analysis of audio-recorded briefings and log files on updates of supervisors, the research has found that there is a certain association between the process of professional updating and the feedback style used by supervisors. It appears that greater engagement with professional development material correlates with a collaborative supervision style, while less engagement seems to correlate with a more directive and corrective style of feedback. The potential for change in supervisory culture through professional development is demonstrated by such associations. The study discusses context-bound observations from the English language institutes and calls for larger-scale research to validate the observed patterns. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| EFL Supervision؛ Feedback Styles؛ Iranian English Language Institutes؛ Mixed-Methods؛ Professional Updating | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Agheshteh, H., & Mehrpour, S. (2021). Teacher autonomy and supervisor authority: Power dynamics in language teacher supervision in Iran. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 9(1), 87-106.
Akbari, R., & Yazdanmehr, E. (2021). A comprehensive analysis of EFL teaching in Iranian private language institutes. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(4), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1204.05
Alshammari, A. (2020). Exploring Kuwaiti EFL supervisors’ and teachers’ perceptions of post-observation feedback. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 759–776. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13446a
Al-Zahrani, M. S., & Al-Bargi, A. (2017). The impact of supervision on EFL teachers’ performance: A Saudi perspective. English Language Teaching, 10(6), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n6p117
Azizpour, S., & Gholami, J. (2021). EFL teacher-supervisors’ attitudes toward supervision in Iranian language schools. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(1), 16-34.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Çelik Korkmaz, S. (2021). Teachers’ beliefs and practices of L1 use in EFL classrooms in Turkey. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 556–571. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1320476.pdf
Cook, V. (2001). Using the first language in the classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), 402–423. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.3.402
Copland, F., & Mann, S. (2010). Dialogic or demonic? The role of the feedback session in pre-service teacher education. Classroom Discourse, 1(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2010.512867
Copland, F., & Neokleous, G. (2011). L1 to teach L2: Complexities and contradictions. ELT Journal, 65(3), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq047
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Derakhshan, A., & Zangoei, A. (2024). The interplay of L1 use, foreign language enjoyment, and anxiety in Iranian EFL classrooms. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2239290
Derakhshan, A., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). The relationship between Iranian EFL teachers’ reflective teaching and their self-efficacy. Language Teaching Research, 25(5), 695–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211043529
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. D.C. Heath and Company. https://www.sciepub.com/reference/186612
Ellis, R. (2018). Reflections on task-based language teaching. Multilingual Matters.
Farahian, M., & Asefi, M. (2022). EFL teachers’ perceptions of clinical supervision in Iranian language institutes. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(2), 789–805. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2021-0102
Gebhard, J. G. (2017). Teaching English as a foreign or second language: A teacher self-development and methodology guide (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press.
Gholaminejad, R., & Rezaei, S. (2021). Power dynamics in post-observation feedback: A case study of Iranian EFL contexts. Journal of Language and Education, 7(3), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.11854
Gholaminejad, R., & Rezaei, S. (2024). Power and face in post-observation feedback: A case study of Iranian EFL supervisors. Language and Intercultural Communication, 24(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2023.2277869
Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Further Education Unit.
Hall, G., & Cook, G. (2023). Own-language use in language teaching and learning: A state-of-the-art review. Language Teaching, 56(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000513
Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education. https://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/451
Koç, F. S., & Savas, P. (2024). Supervision models and supervisory feedback in English language teacher education: A meta-synthesis study adopting a discourse analytic perspective. TESL-EJ, 27(4), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27108a1
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Mehrpour, S., & Agheshteh, H. (2017). Supervisory feedback efficiency: Developing a framework based on Iranian EFL teachers’ and supervisors’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(3), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.3p.24
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
O’Leary, M. (2020). Classroom observation: A guide to the effective observation of teaching and learning. Routledge
Randall, M., & Thornton, B. (2021). Advising and supporting teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Rashidi, N., & Foroutan, A. (2015). On the Iranian in-service and pre-service language teachers’ perceptions of educational supervision concerning their professional development. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), 4(2), 27-55.
Sadeghi, K., & Richards, J. C. (2023). The struggle to implement communicative language teaching: A case study from Iran. RELC Journal, 54(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231156321
Safari, I., Davaribina, M., & Khoshnevis, I. (2020). The influence of EFL teachers' self-efficacy, job satisfaction and reflective thinking on their professional development: a structural equation modeling. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 13(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2020.130103
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/the-art-of-case-study-research/book214422
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://www.wenger-trayner.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/2000-EWT-Article-for-Organization-CoPs-and-social-learning-systems.pdf
Xie, X., & Li, L. (2023). Teacher talking time in Chinese EFL classrooms: A sociocultural perspective. Language Teaching Research, 27(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221140490
Yuan, R., Lee, I., De Costa, P. I., Yang, M., & Liu, S. (2022). TESOL teacher educators in higher education: A review of studies from 2010 to 2020. Language Teaching, 55(4), 434-469. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 132 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 112 |
||