آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,530 |
| تعداد مقالات | 18,638 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 61,252,306 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 22,032,256 |
Teachers’ Praxis in EFL Classrooms: Insights from in Service and Retired Educators in Public and Private Schools. | ||
| Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
| مقاله 21، دوره 18، شماره 37، مهر 2026، صفحه 397-422 اصل مقاله (506.74 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2026.72434.2869 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Fatemeh Nikootabar1؛ Seyyed Mohammad Reza Adel* 2؛ Seyyed Mohammad Reza Amirian2؛ Gholamreza Zareian2 | ||
| 1Fatemeh Nikootabar Ph.D. Student of TEFL Department of English Language and Literature Faculty of Literature and Humanities Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran | ||
| 2Department of English Language and Literature Faculty of Literature and Humanities Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The present qualitative study examined the practices of in-service and retired English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers in public and private schools to provide a comprehensive understanding of their pedagogical approaches. The researchers used a multi-faceted data collection strategy, including semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and classroom observations, providing an in-depth exploration of the constructs that influence teaching practices. 40 EFL teachers from public schools and educational institutions participated in this study. All participants provided informed consent before their involvement in the study. The researchers used MAXQDA software 24 and thematic analysis to analyze the collected data. The findings highlighted the significance of promoting student agency, social transformation, cultural relevance, emotional ecology, critical reflection, ethical decision-making, collegiality and collaboration, and feedback and communication. These constructs collectively demonstrated how teachers provide supportive and engaging learning environments that empower students and promote active participation in their educational journeys. The findings have pedagogical implications for teachers, learners, curriculum designers, and policy makers. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Praxis Pedagogy؛ EFL Teachers؛ Thematic Analysis؛ Qualitative Research | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Andreotti, V. (2016). The educational challenges of imagining the world differently. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement, 37(1), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2016.1134456
Angrosino, M., & Rosenberg, J. (2011). Observations on observation. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4, 467-478.
Arnold, J., & Mundy, B. (2020). Praxis pedagogy in teacher education. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-0116-z
Arnold, J., Edwards, T., Hooley, N., & Williams, J. (2012). Conceptualising teacher education and research as “critical praxis”. Critical Studies in Education, 53(3), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2012.703140
Bradley, C., Devlin, M., Brennan, P., Tierney, H., Conlon, S. R., & Crickley, A. (2024). Pedagogy as Praxis: Education and training in initial professional education for Community Workers and Youth Workers. The Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning, 21(1-2). https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v21i1-2.2050
Breunig, M. (2009). Teaching for and about critical pedagogy in the post-secondary classroom. Studies in Social Justice, 3(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v3i2.1018
Chaleila, W. A. (2025). From Theory to Praxis: Humanizing Pedagogy in EFL Practicum. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(6), 3510-3528. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i6.2478
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ciesielska, M., & Jemielniak, D. (Eds.). (2018). Qualitative methodologies in organization studies (p. 33). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S.L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Doecke, B., & Yandell, J. (2025). The Standpoint of ‘Praxis’: Practitioner Inquiry into Language and Learning within English Classrooms. Changing English, 32(2), 212-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2024.2443596
Edwards-Groves, C., & Gray, D. (2008). Developing praxis and reflective practice in pre-service teacher education: Affordances and constraints reported by prospective teachers. In Enabling Praxis (pp. 85-107). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903275_006
Edwards-Groves, C., Grootenboer, P., & Smith, T. (2018). Knowing pedagogical praxis in the twenty-first century education. Education in an era of schooling: Critical perspectives of educational practice and action research. A festschrift for Stephen Kemmis, 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2053-8_10
Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (2014). Praxis, practice and practice architectures. In Changing practices, changing education (pp. 25-41). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-47-4
Kemmis, S. (2024). Professional learning for praxis development: reflections. Professional development in education, 50(3), 579-585. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2024.2339041
Kemmis, S., & Grootenboer, P. (2008). Situating praxis in practice: Practice architectures and the cultural, social and material conditions for practice. In Enabling praxis (pp. 37-62). Brill.
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Magill, K. R., & Salinas, C. (2018). The primacy of relation: Social studies teachers and the praxis of critical pedagogy. Theory & Research in Social Education, 47, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2018.1519476
Mahon, K., Kemmis, S., Francisco, S., & Lloyd, A. (2017). Introduction: Practice theory and the theory of practice architectures. Exploring education and professional practice: Through the lens of practice architectures, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2219-7_1
Mahon, K., Heikkinen, H. L., Huttunen, R., Boyle, T., & Sjølie, E. (2020). What is educational praxis? In Pedagogy, education, and praxis in critical times (pp. 15-38). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6926-5_2
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons
Olin, A., Francisco, S., Salo, P., Pörn, M., & Karlberg-Granlund, G. (2020). Collaborative professional learning for changing educational practices. Pedagogy, education, and praxis in critical times, 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6926-5
Shakouri, N., & Mirzaee, S. (2016). More conscientious look at teachers’ praxis: A culminative balance. International Journal of Research, 5(1), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2015.1094
Smith, T. J. (2008). Fostering a praxis stance in pre-service teacher education. In Enabling praxis (pp. 63-84). Brill.
Tagata, W. M. (2018). Post-critique in contemporary ELT praxis. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 18(2), 255-280. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6398201812025 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 27 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 37 |
||