آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 18,620 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 61,128,442 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 21,941,233 |
Using Classcraft to Foster Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Development through Gamified Collaborative Writing | ||
| Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
| مقاله 17، دوره 18، شماره 37، مهر 2026، صفحه 317-338 اصل مقاله (539.15 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2026.72131.2861 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Abdolreza Khalili* 1؛ Farzin Khalili2 | ||
| 1Department of English Language, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran | ||
| 2English Language Department, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study examined the effects of gamified-collaborative, gamified, and collaborative writing instruction on Iranian EFL learners’ writing development using Classcraft. Ninety-six intermediate learners from four classes at a private language institute in Urmia were selected through convenience sampling and assigned to four groups: a Gamified–Collaborative Instruction Group (GCIG), a Gamified Instruction Group (GIG), a Collaborative Instruction Group (CIG), and a Control Group (CG). All participants completed a pretest to establish homogeneity in writing proficiency, assessed using an analytic writing rubric. The experimental groups received their treatments over 16 sessions, while the control group received traditional instruction. A writing posttest was administered at the end of the intervention. Quantitative data were analyzed through one-way ANOVA and paired-samples t-tests. The results indicated that all three instructional approaches significantly improved learners’ writing performance. However, the gamified–collaborative approach demonstrated the greatest effectiveness, followed by gamified instruction and collaborative instruction. These findings highlight the pedagogical value of integrating game-based elements and collaborative learning to enhance EFL writing outcomes. The study has certain implications for syllabus designers since it underscores Classcraft’s potential as a digital platform for fostering meaningful writing development among Iranian EFL learners. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Classcraft؛ Collaborative Approach؛ Gamified Approach؛ Gamified-Collaborative Approach؛ Writing Ability | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Allan D. (2004). Oxford placement test. Oxford University Press.
Anunpattana, J. (2021). Gamified collaborative writing tasks in EFL classrooms: Effects on interaction and engagement. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 327–346.
Bailey, D. R., & Almusharraf, N. (2021). Online collaborative writing and interactional competence in L2 English: Insights from synchronous digital platforms. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 900–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1704786
Chen, W., & Yu, S. (2023). Investigating peer interaction patterns in collaborative writing: A multidimensional analysis of L2 learners’ co‑construction of texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 62, 101042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101042
Creswell. J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th Ed). Sage.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Dobakhti, L., & Khalili, A. (2024). A contributory study of the factors in British and Iranian English instructors’ teacher immunity. Applied Research on English Language, 13(2), 125-148. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2024.141099.2264
Fu, Q. K., Lin, C. J., Hwang, G. J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Impacts of a mind mapping-based contextual gaming approach on EFL students’ writing performance, learning perceptions and generative uses in an English course. Computers & Education, 137, 59-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.005.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2024). IBM SPSS statistics 29 step by step: A simple guide and reference (18th ed.). Routledge.
Guo, K., Li, Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). Game on: Enhancing argumentative writing with digital gamification. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2374347
Guo, X., Li, M., & Chen, Y. (2024). EFL learners’ perceptions of gamified writing instruction: A mixed-methods study. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 1-23.
Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Newbury House.
Jeon, E. H. (Ed.). (2022). Understanding L2 proficiency: Theoretical and meta-analytic investigations. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skill: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1-26. http://doi.org/10.17239/jor-2008.01.01.1
Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 79-95.
Khalili, A., Dobakhti, L., & Zohrabi, M. (2024). Scrutinizing the predicting factors in native and nonnative English instructors’ teacher immunity. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 62-74. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2023.43835.3061
Khalili, A., Kashef, S. H., & Khalili, F. (2022). Interlinking corrective feedback with EAP writing instruction: An advantageous endeavor. ESP Today, 10(2), 286-309. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2022.10.2.5
Khalili, A., & Zohrabi, M. (2024). Predictors of New Zealander and Iranian English teachers’ productive and maladaptive teacher immunity. Journal of Language Horizons, 8(3), 97-124. https://doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2024.46117.1892
Khalili, A., Zohrabi, M., Dobakhti, L., & Gholami, J. (2025). Convenience editing in medical sciences: Professional expertise vis-à-vis linguistic virtuosity. Language Related Research, 16(1), 161-189. https://doi.org/10.48311/LRR.16.1.7
Khonamri, F., & Salimi, H. (2020). The impact of collaborative writing on EFL learners’ writing accuracy and fluency: Insights from the Iranian educational context. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2020.120823
Lam, Y. W., Hew, K. F., & Chiu, K. F. (2018). Improving argumentative writing: Effects of a blended learning approach and gamification. Language Learning & Technology 22 (1), 97-118. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44583
Latham-Koenig, C., Oxenden, C., & Lambert, J. (2019). American English file 3. Oxford University Press.
Lee, L. (2004). Learners’ interaction in an online collaborative writing task. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 97–110.
Li, M., & Kim, D. (2020). The effects of collaborative writing on L2 learners’ writing development: A meta‑analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 54(2), 515–546. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.553
Lin, C. J., Hwang, G. J., Fu, Q. K., & Chen, J. F. (2018). A flipped contextual game-based learning approach to enhancing EFL students’ English business writing performance and reflective behaviors. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 117-131.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of SLA (pp. 413-468). Academic Press.
Marandi, S. S., & Seyyedrezaie, M. S. (2017). The multi-course comparison of the effectiveness of two EFL writing environments: Google drive versus face-to-face on Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance and writing apprehension. CALL-EJ, 18(1), 9–21.
Mohammadnia, Z., & Khalili, A. (2014a). An investigation of the existence of a threshold level for the vocabulary. Iranian EFL Journal, 10(6), 590-608.
Mohammadnia, Z., & Khalili, A. (2014b). Linguistic focus of language related episodes in intermediate and advanced EFL learners’ group-based interactions: A case study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(2), 127-133. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.2p.127
Mohammadnia, Z., & Khalili, A. (2014c). An investigation of the differential effects of visual input enhancement on the vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(4), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.4p.69
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Open University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452
Rincon-Flores, E. G., Gallardo, K., & García, J. (2022). Team-based gamification in writing instruction: Effects on engagement and persistence. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 25(2), 15-28.
Rivera-Trigueros I., & Sánchez-Pérez M. M. (2020). Conquering the iron throne: Using Classcraft to foster students’ motivation in the EFL classroom, Teaching English with Technology, 20 (2), 3-22.
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). Gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112.
Sanchez, E., Young, S., & Jouneau-Sion, C. (2017). Classcraft: From gamification to ludicization of classroom management. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 497-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9489-6
Sipone S., Abella-García V., Rojo M., & dell’Olio L. (2021). Using ClassCraft to improve primary school students’ knowledge and interest in sustainable mobility. Sustainability, 15(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179939.
Storch, N. (2011). Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes, and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000079
Tahmasebi, E., & Soleimani, H. (2022). Collaborative writing through Google Docs: Effects on Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance and engagement. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 9(2), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.30479/JMRELS.2022.15806
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732997
Zhang, M., & Hyland, K. (2022). Collaborative writing and learner engagement in L2 classrooms: A synthesis of recent research. Language Teaching Research, 26(6), 1288–1307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820927702
Zohrabi, M., & Khalili, A. (2023). The philosophy of teacher immunity: EFL teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 17(45), 330-346. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2024.59889.3664
Zohrabi, M., & Khalili, A. (2024a). A cross-cultural study into the utility of diverse written corrective feedback strategies in medicine students’ ESP writing courses. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 12(2), 150-169. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2024.2025600.3436
Zohrabi, M., & Khalili, A. (2024b). A study of the predictors of English and Persian language learners’ psychological well-being. Literary Arts, 16(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.22108/liar.2024.140835.2360
Zohrabi, M., & Khalili, A. (2025). The utility of tailor-made teacher education in Iranian EFL instructors’ attitudes towards dynamic assessment. Language Testing in Asia, 15(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00366-9 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 113 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 44 |
||