سَهلِ مُمتنع: امتزاج ایدئولوژی با قانون در سیر اندیشه‌های فلسفی (از هابرماس تا فوکو و رانسیر)

Baxter, H. (A) (2002). Habermas’s discourse theory of law and democracy. Buffalo Law Review, 50(1), 205–340. https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol50/iss1/6

Baxter, H. (B) (2002). System and lifeworld in Habermas’s theory of law. Cardozo Law Review, 23, 473–482. https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/549

Braeckman, A. (2018). The hermeneutics of society: On the state in Lefort’s political theory. Constellations, 25(2), 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12318

Buonamano, R. (2014). The legal subject in Althusser’s political theory. Law and Critique, 25(3), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-014-9139-3

Etxabe, J. (2017). Jacques Rancière and the dramaturgy of law. In M. López Lerma & J. Etxabe (Eds.), Rancière and law (pp. 17–42). Routledge.

Fossen, T. (2015). Judgment and imagination in Habermas’s theory of law. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 41(2), 129–151. https://psc.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0191453714566485

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage.

Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (W. Rehg, Trans.). MIT Press.

Halpin, A. (2006). Ideology and law. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687932

Hunt, A. (1985). The ideology of law: Advances and problems in recent applications of the concept of ideology to the analysis of law. Law & Society Review, 19(1), 11–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053393

Jouet, M. (2022). Foucault, prison, and human rights: A dialectic of theory and criminal justice reform. Theoretical Criminology, 26(2), 202–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806211015968

Leiter, B. (2015). Marx, law, ideology, legal positivism. Virginia Law Review, 101(4), 1179–1196. https://virginialawreview.org/articles/marx-law-ideology-legal-positivism/

Margulies, J. D. (2018). The Conservation Ideological State Apparatus. Conservation and Society, 16(2), 181–192. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26393328

O’Neill, S. (2000). Democracy, deliberation and the participation gap. Political Studies, 48(5), 737–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00272

Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy (J. Rose, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.

Rancière, J. (2004). The politics of aesthetics: The distribution of the sensible (G. Rockhill, Trans.). Continuum.

Rosenfeld, M. (1995). Can rights, democracy, and justice be reconciled through discourse theory? Reflections on Habermas’s proceduralist paradigm of law. Cardozo Law Review, 17(4–5), 791–838. https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/clr/vol17/iss4/5

Ross, K. (1991). Rancière and the practice of equality. Social Text, (29), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/466299

Tadros, V. (1998). Between governance and discipline: The law and Michel Foucault. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 18(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/18.1.75

Van Asseldonk, M. (2025). Claude Lefort in the age of the total constitution. Global Constitutionalism, 14(3), 569–595. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381725000061

Waal, T. (2012). Personal Responsibility Under Totalitarian Regimes: An Analysis of Hannah Arendt’s Philosophy on The Prevention of Evildoing and Criminal Liability for International Crimes, Amsterdam Law Forum, 4(1), 131-142.

Walby, K. (2007). Contributions to a post-sovereigntist understanding of law: Foucault, law as governance, and legal pluralism. Social & Legal Studies, 16(4), 551–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663907082735

Wydra, H. (2009). The liminal origins of democracy. International Political Anthropology, 2(1), 91–109.

Yang, F. (2022). Between normativity and social facts: A sociological interpretation of Habermas’s discourse theory of law and democracy. In Habermas’s discourse theory of law and democracy (pp. 51–72). Springer.

Zuberi, F., & Susewind, R. (2024). Totalitarian law and communal ghettoisation: An Arendtian perspective. Social & Legal Studies, 33(5), 748–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639241266756