آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,530 |
| تعداد مقالات | 18,634 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 61,229,744 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 22,019,812 |
Gamified Collaborative Writing: Fostering Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Development Using Classcraft | ||
| Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
| مقاله 18، دوره 18، شماره 37، مهر 2026، صفحه 339-356 اصل مقاله (461.87 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2026.71683.2854 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Zahra Kheirdast1؛ Keivan Seyyedi* 2 | ||
| 1MA student of Department of English, Mahabad branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahabad, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Foreign Languages, Mah. C., Islamic Azad University, Mahabad, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The growth of using Artificial intelligence (AI) programs in learning languages is undeniable, but the question is if all learners with wide range of individual differences can benefit these tools. This study aims to explore the effect of Artificial intelligence-assisted collaborative tasks on Iranian EFL learners' communicative proficiency, with specific focus on how different levels of critical thinking moderates this effect. The present study employs a quai-experimental design with pre-test and post-test structure. 80 female learners of the age of 13 - 17 who processed intermediate level of English were selected out of 150 learners in Top Notch classes of a private language institute through an English proficiency test (PET) in advance, were divided based on their different level of critical thinking via Facione 2011 critical thinking skills test to low, moderate and high. Learners of every level of critical thinking were randomly divided into an experimental and a control group, thus six groups were formed. The participants in the experimental groups were given AI-mediated collaborative tasks but the participants in the control groups were given regular traditional tasks. After comparing the results of the pre-tests to the post-tests the results support the fact that the use of AI-assisted collaborative tasks had positive impact on communicative proficiency of learners in all levels of critical thinking also established the higher the level of the critical thinking, the bigger the improvement of communicative proficiency. This paper is useful for teachers, professors, syllabus designers and even parents in schools, institutes and universities. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Artificial Intelligence (AI)؛ Communicative Proficiency؛ Collaborative Tasks؛ Critical Thinking؛ Individual Differences | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Azamatova, A., Bekeyeva, N., Zhaxylikova, K., Sarbassova, A., & Ilyassova, N. (2023). The Effect of Using Artificial Intelligence and Digital Learning Tools Based on Project-Based Learning Approach in Foreign Language Teaching on Students' Success and Motivation. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 11(6), 1458-1475.
Avsheniuk, N., Lutsenko, O., Svyrydiuk, T., & Seminikhyna, N. (2024). Empowering language learners’ critical thinking: Evaluating ChatGPT’s role in English course implementation. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.3.314
Bakhshayesh, M., Jafarpour, A., & Hashemian, M. (2026). Relationship among critical thinking, multiple intelligence, and Iranian EFL learners’ speaking skill. Language Teaching Research, 30(1), 262-287.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.7
Chou, C.-Y. (2021). Artificial intelligence and EFL task-based instruction: Impacts on communicative competence. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(8), 1153–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1654031
Chou, P.-N. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in language learning: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 45–58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26937126
Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27–50). Oxford University Press.
Darwin, Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2024). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2290342.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. University of Illinois.
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts (2011 update). Insight Assessment.
Feng, L. (2025). Investigating the effects of artificial intelligence-assisted language learning strategies on cognitive load and learning outcomes: A comparative study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(8), 1741-1774.
Fryer, L. K., & Carpenter, R. (2006). Bots as language learning tools. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 8–14.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Emerging technologies: Using artificial intelligence in language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 22(2), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.011
Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Using mobile technology to develop language skills and cultural understanding. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langtec.2018.08.003
Ghufran, F., Ali, A., Khan, M. A., & Irshad, P. (2026). Evaluating the Effect of Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) on Speaking Fluency among ESL Learners: A Quasi-Experimental Study. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 4(1), 41-53.
Hassan, M., Javid, C. Z., & Abid, A. (2021). Investigating AI integration in EFL speaking classrooms: Learner autonomy and confidence building. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1447a
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
Li, C. (2022). Real-time feedback and AI in EFL speaking instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5–6), 950–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1799821
Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt040.0
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
Luxton, D. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: Applications and implications for English language teaching. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(4), 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00212-0
Luxton, M. (2020). Artificial intelligence and adaptive feedback in EFL learning. Computers & Education, 150, 103834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103834
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667336
Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. Columbia University Press.
Rezaei, S., Derakhshan, A., & Bagherkazemi, M. (2011). Critical thinking in language education. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(4), 769.
Saiz, C., & Rivas, S. F. (2010). Evaluation of the ARDESOS program: A critical thinking intervention for university students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.07.002
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596429
Simatupang, E., & Heryono, H. (2026). The Efficacy of Technology-Enhanced Task-Based Language Teaching: Evidence from Artificial Intelligence-Supported English Instruction. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 8(2), 219.
Son, J. B., Ružić, N. K., & Philpott, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence technologies and applications for language learning and teaching. Journal of China computer-assisted language learning, 5(1), 94-112.
Torres, P. J., & Kahveci, Y. E. (2025). Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in language teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100522.
Van Gorp, K. (2026). Making all repertoires count: Re‐envisioning TBLT through critical multilingual language awareness. The Modern Language Journal.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, S., & Vasquez, C. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us? CALICO Journal, 29(3), 412–430. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.3.412-430
Warschauer, M., & Liaw, M.-L. (2010). Emerging technologies in adult literacy and language education. National Institute for Literacy.
Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press.
Woolf, B. P. (2010). Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373594-2.00018-3
Zarei, N. (2018). The impact of critical thinking on learning English language. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 85 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 26 |
||