آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,535 |
| تعداد مقالات | 18,735 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 61,813,529 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 22,455,130 |
The Effect of Teacher’s Scaffolding on Improving the Inner Speech of EFL Learners: Moderated by the Behavioral Inhibition/Activation Systems | ||
| Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 18، شماره 37، مهر 2026، صفحه 47-64 اصل مقاله (876.28 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2026.71117.2842 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Zhila Balegh1؛ Shima Ahmadi-Azad* 2؛ Mohammad Hossein Yousefi3 | ||
| 1Department of English Language Teaching, Sara. C., Islamic Azad University, Sarab, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor of English Language Teaching Department, Sara. C., Islamic Azad University, Sarab, Iran | ||
| 3Department of English, Bon. C., Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Understanding the interplay between the social (teacher scaffolding), cognitive (inner speech [IS]), and psychological (behavioral inhibition/activation systems [BIS/BAS]) factors involved in language development, can be crucial in designing effective language instruction. This research investigated the impact of teacher scaffolding on Iranian English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ IS, moderated by BIS/BAS sensitivity. A sample of 58 advanced EFL learners was selected through purposive sampling based on Oxford Quick Placement Test results and assigned to two groups. The experimental group (n=28) received instruction through teacher scaffolding, and the control group (n=30) received the conventional teaching methods. To assess learners’ BIS/BAS, the Gary-Wilson Personality Questionnaire was utilized, and Varieties of IS Questionnaire-Revised was applied in pretest and posttest phases to measure learners’ IS. Results of the analysis of covariance revealed that teacher scaffolding could significantly enhance learners’ IS and supported its effectiveness as a pedagogical strategy. Although BAS sensitivity did not have a significant impact on IS development, BIS sensitivity could significantly inhibit IS, suggesting that the anxiety and fear of negative evaluation can adversely affect cognitive processes. The findings have important implications for considering both social and emotional factors when designing EFL pedagogical strategies. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Scaffolding؛ Inner Speech؛ Behavioral Inhibition System؛ Behavioral Activation System؛ EFL Learners | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbasi Dogolsara, S., Ahangari, S., & Seifoori, Z. (2022). Improving the fluency of the Iranian EFL learners’ oral performance through task variation. International Journal of Research in English Education, 7(3), 76–93.
Aboitiz, F., Henríquez-Ch, R., & Alamos-Grau, F. (2025). The development and evolution of inner speech: Hippocampal contribution. Medical Hypotheses, 203, Article 111739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2025.111739
Akiba, D. (2025). Ctrl + Alt + Inner speech: A verbal–cognitive scaffold (VCS) model of pathways to computational thinking. Journal of Intelligence, 13, 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13120156
Albalawneh, R., & Tepsuriwong, S. (2020). Scaffolding strategies used in teaching listening comprehension to young learners. ThaiTESOL Proceedings, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.1.164-175
Alderson-Day, B., & Fernyhough, C. (2015). Inner speech: development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology. Psychol Bull., 141, 931–65.
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.2307/328585
Balconi, M., Rovelli, K., Angioletti, L., & Allegretta, R. A. (2024). Working memory workload when making complex decisions: A behavioral and EEG study. Sensors., 24(17), 5754.
Balconi, M., & Mazza, G. (2010). Lateralization effect in comprehension of emotional facial expression: A comparison between EEG alpha band power and behavioral inhibition (BIS) and activation (BAS) systems. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 15(3), 361–384.
Bermúdez, J. L. (2003). Thinking without words. Oxford University Press.
Bilge, Y., & Emiral, E. (2022). The mediator role of BIS/BAS systems in the relationship between psychological symptoms and borderline personality features: Conformation from a non-Western sample. Curr Psychol, 41, 9008–9018.
Blanca, M. J., Alarcón, R., Arnau, J., Bono, R., & Bendayan, R. (2017). Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema, 29(4), 552–557. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.383
Britton, E. M., Laurin, K., Grossmann, I., Dorfman, A., Oakes, H., & Scholer, A. A. (2023). The dynamics of self-control conflicts in daily life in predicting self-control success and perceived self-regulatory effectiveness. Collabra: Psychology, 9(1), 88158.
Buschman, T. J., & Miller, E. K. (2023). Working memory is complex and dynamic, like your thoughts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 35(1), 17–30.
Camminga, T. F., Hermans, D., van der Ven, S., Segers, E., & Vissers, C. T. W. M. (2025). The role of inner speech in emotion recognition in children with and without developmental language disorder. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 37(4), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2025.2478887
Carruthers, P. (2018). The causes and contents of inner speech. In P. Langland-Hassan & A. Vicente (Eds.), Inner speech: New voices (pp. 31–52). Oxford University Press.
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
Daneman, M., & Newson, M. (1992). Assessing the importance of subvocalization during normal silent reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027240
De Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, S. O. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51–68.
De Guerrero, M. C. M. (2018). Going covert: Inner and private speech in language learning. Language Teaching, 51(1), 1–35.
Dewaele, J. M. (2015). From obscure echo to language of the heart: Multilinguals’ language choices for (emotional) inner speech. Journal of Pragmatics 87, 1–7.
Entezari, M., Shamsipour Dehkordi, P., & Heidari, M. (2022). The effect of personality characteristics combined with behavioral activation system (BAS)/behavioral inhibition system (BIS) and sport emotional induction on working memory. Biomedical Human Kinetics, 14, 17–24.
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336
Fatehi Rad, N., & Jalali, V. (2021). ZPD theory and scaffolding teaching strategy: Iranian EFL learners’ views and reading achievement of short stories as a way of literature incorporation within learning procedure. Critical Literary Studies, 3(1), 181–209. https://doi:10.34785/J014.2021.676
Fernyhough, C. (2016). The voices within: The history and science of how we talk to ourselves. Profile Books.
Firoozjah, M. H., Homayouni, A., Shahrbanian, S., Shahriari, S., & Janinejad, D. (2022). Behavioral activation/inhibition systems and lifestyle as predictors of mental disorders in adolescent athletes during Covid19 pandemic. BMC Public Health, 22, 1444.
Gabry´s-Barker, D. (2015). Communicating with oneself: On the phenomenon of private/inner speech. In L. Piasecka, M. Adams-Tukiendorf & P. Wilk (eds.), New media and perennial problems in foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 115–130). Springer.
Ghanizadeh, A., Mousavinejad, T. (2023). The impact of teacher technology-enhanced scaffolding on female EFL learners’ grammar achievement, directed motivational currents (DMCs), and mastery goal. Interchange 54, 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-023-09502-x
Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Heinemann.
Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D., & Sanders, J. R. (1972). Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance. Review of Educational Research, 42(3), 237–288. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543042003237
Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford University Press.
Gregory, D., & Langland-Hassan, P. (2024). Inner speech. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2024 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/inner-speech/
Hung, B. P., & Nguyen, L.T. (2022). Scaffolding language learning in the online classroom. In Sharma, R., Sharma, D. (Eds.), New trends and applications in Internet of things (IoT) and Big Data Analytics (pp 109–122). Springer.
Jackendoff, R. (1996). How language helps us think. Pragmatics & Cognition, 4(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.4.1.03jac
Jamali Kivi, P., Namaziandost, E., Fakhri Alamdari, E. et al. (2021). The comparative effects of teacher versus peer-scaffolding on EFL learners’ incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension: A socio-cultural perspective. J Psycholinguist Res 50, 1031–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09800-4
Kompa, N. A. (2024). Inner speech and “pure” thought – Do we think in language? Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 15, 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-023-00678-w
Lantolf, J. P. & Poehner, M. E. (2008). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. Equinox.
Lantolf, J. P. & S. L. Thorne (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
Li, Z., Oon, PT. E. & Chai, S. (2024). Examining the impact of teacher scaffolding in the knowledge building environment: Insights from students’ interaction patterns, social epistemic networks, and academic performance. Educ Inf Technol, 29, 18501–18532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12535-z
Łysiak M (2019) Inner dialogical communication and pathological personality traits. Front. Psychol. 10,1663. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01663
Maisarah, S., & Motevalli, S. (2025). Exploring the role of teacher scaffolding in fostering independent learning. KMAN Counseling and Psychology Nexus, 3, 1–10. http://doi.org/10.61838/kman.ec.psynexus.3.14
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1994). The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44(2), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01103.x
Maji, S., Sinha, S., Chaturmohta, A., & Sharma, S. N. (2024). Punishment sensitivity and depression: the serially mediating role of procrastination and academic satisfaction. Curr Psychol., 43, 18552–18560.
Miyake, A., Emerson, M. J., Padiall, F., & Ahn. J. C. (2004). Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: the effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cue paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 115, 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.004
Mohammadi Shirmahaleh, F., Jomehri, F., Keraskian, A., & Malihi Alzakerini, S. (2017). The effect of emotional intelligence in glycemic control in patients with type II diabetes. Journal of Research & Health, 7(6), 1111–1119. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jrh.7.6.1111
Morin, A. (2005). Possible links between self-awareness and inner speech. Theoretical background, underlying mechanisms, and empirical evidence. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(4–5), 115–134.
Petrolini, V., Jorba, M., & Vicente, A. (2020). The role of inner speech in executive functioning tasks: Schizophrenia with auditory verbal hallucinations and autistic spectrum conditions as case studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 572035. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572035
Pishadast, A., Mojavezi, A., & Okati, F. (2022). Enhancing writing ability through scaffolding techniques: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 12(3), 214–237. https://doi.org/10.22059/jflr.2022.338918.936
Puchalska-Wasyl, M., & Oleś, P. (2013). Doubtfulness – a dialogical perspective. Psychol. Lang. Commun. 17, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2013-0007
Racy, F., & Morin, A. (2024). Relationships between self-talk, inner speech, mind wandering, mindfulness, self-concept clarity, and self-regulation in university students. Behavioral Sciences, 14(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14010055
Slobodskaya, H. R., Safronova, M. V., Knyazev, G., & Wilson, G. D. (2001). Reactions of Russian adolescents to reward and punishment: A cross-cultural study of the Gray–Wilson personality questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(7), 1211–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00104-5
Smillie, L. D., Jackson, C. J., & Dalgleish, L. I. (2006). Conceptual distinctions among Carver and White’s (1994) BAS scales: A reward-reactivity versus trait impulsivity perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(5), 1039–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.012
Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W., & Brooks, L. (2015). Languaging in collaborative dialogue: Theory, research, and practice. John Benjamins Publishing.
Tran, L. Q. B., & Luu, N. Q. H. (2022). The impact of scaffolding strategies on speaking performance: EFL teachers’ perceptions and practices. International Journal of Science and Management Studies, 5(4), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v5i4p118
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wilson, G.D., Barrett, P.T. & Gray, J.A. (1989). Human reactions to reward and punishment: A questionnaire examination of Gray’s personality theory. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 509–515.
Wu, S., & Song, T. (2026). Effects of affective vs. instructional teacher scaffolding on preschoolers’ emotional engagement and social attention in picturebook reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1743106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1743106
Yao, B. (2025). Rethinking inner speech through linguistic active inference. Psychological Review. Advance online publication. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000607 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 180 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 127 |
||