آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,530 |
| تعداد مقالات | 18,634 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 61,230,231 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 22,020,257 |
The Effect of AI-Assisted Blended Self- and Peer-Assessment on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing and Motivation: The Role of Extroversion and Introversion | ||
| Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
| مقاله 24، دوره 18، شماره 37، مهر 2026، صفحه 453-472 اصل مقاله (505.17 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2026.71591.2851 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Karim Shabani* ؛ Niloofar Ahmadnezhad | ||
| Allameh Mohaddes Nouri University | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This mixed‑methods study examined the effects of AI‑assisted blended self- and peer‑assessment on the writing performance and motivation of 80 intermediate Iranian EFL learners, while also exploring the mediating role of introversion/extroversion. Participants from a language institute in Babol were divided into two experimental and two control groups. Over 12 sessions, the experimental groups received AI‑supported feedback within a process‑based writing approach, whereas the control groups followed conventional instruction. Quantitative results showed that the experimental groups significantly outperformed the control groups in both writing and motivation. However, no significant interaction was found between treatment and personality type, indicating that both introverts and extroverts benefited equally. Qualitative data revealed benefits such as better revision quality, increased autonomy, and higher engagement, alongside challenges like concerns about feedback reliability and peer evaluation quality. Overall, the findings support the integration of AI‑assisted blended self‑ and peer‑assessment as an effective formative assessment tool for enhancing writing skills and motivation across different personality styles in EFL contexts. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| AI؛ Blended self- and peer assessment؛ Introverted learners؛ Motivation؛ Writing؛ Extroverted learners | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdalkader, S. M. A. (2022). Using artificial intelligence to improve writing fluency for the preparatory stage students in distinguished governmental language schools. Egyptian Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 39-70. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejes.2022.270694
Abo, A. L., Degefu, H. W., & Abeba, B. D. (2025). Teacher-assisted peer assessment and self-efficacy in writing: A quasi-experiment among Ethiopian undergraduate EFL students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101618
Al Ghaithi, A., & Behforouz, B. (2025). Effects of interaction with AI-assisted writing evaluation on EFL students’ writing performance. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 17(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2025.17.009
Ali, R. (2025). How challenging? Barriers for teachers in institutional implementation of blended learning. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 40(3), 324-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2024.2342922
Amyatun, R. L., & Kholis, A. (2023). Can artificial intelligence (AI) like QuillBot AI assist students’ writing skills? Assisting learning to write texts using AI. ELE Reviews: English Language Education Reviews, 3(2), 135-154. https://doi.org/10.22515/ELEREVIEWS.V3I2.7533
Bailey, S. (2003). Academic writing. A practical guide for students. London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003509264
Barrot, J. S. (2022). Integrating technology into ESL/EFL writing through Grammarly. RELC Journal, 53(3), 764-768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220966632
Bashiri, S., & Ebadi, S. (2024). The impact of AI-based group dynamic assessment on L2 writing proficiency. Technology Assisted Language Education, 2(3), 151-173. https://doi.org/10.22126/TALE.2025.11488.1081
Bill, D. (2011). Writing argumentative essays. Retrieved from http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=1093BB347CD6DC613DD1CB941EA0749B
Birjandi, P., & Bolghari, M. S. (2015). The relationship between the accuracy of self-and peer-assessment of Iranian intermediate EFL learners and their learning styles. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(5), 996. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0505.15
Borna, P., Mohammadi, R., & Nia, R. K. (2024). Investigating the effect of AI writing assistance tools on Iranian intermediate EFL learners' writing performance: A comparative study of ProWritingAid and Grammarly. Research in English Language Pedagogy (RELP), 12(3), 478-504. https://doi.org/10.30486/RELP.2024.897162
Boud, D. (2013). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. Routledge.
Butler, Y. G. (2018). The role of context in young learners’ processes for responding to self‐assessment items. The Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 242-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12459
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Chen, C., & Gong, Y. (2025). The role of AI-assisted learning in academic writing: A mixed-methods study on Chinese as a second language students. Education Sciences, 15(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020141
Cheng, X., Zhang, L. J., & Yan, Q. (2025). Exploring teacher written feedback in EFL writing classrooms: Beliefs and practices in interaction. Language Teaching Research, 29(1), 385-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211057665
Delita, F., Berutu, N., & Nofrıon, N. (2022). Online learning: The effects of using e-modules on self-efficacy, motivation and learning outcomes. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 23(4), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1182760
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Charles C. Thomas.
Fitria, T. (2021). Grammarly as AI-powered English writing assistant: Students’ alternative for writing English. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i1.3519
Guo, K. (2024). EvaluMate: Using AI to support students’ feedback provision in peer assessment for writing. Assessing Writing, 61, 100864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100864
Guo, K., Zhang, E. D., Li, D., & Yu, S. (2025). Using AI‐supported peer review to enhance feedback literacy: An investigation of students' revision of feedback on peers' essays. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(4), 1612-1639. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13540
Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2020). The development of student feedback literacy: the influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5), 680-696. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545
Hill, J., & Smith, K. (2023). Visions of blended learning: identifying the challenges and opportunities in shaping institutional approaches to blended learning in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 32(3), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2023.2176916
Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hsu, T. C., Chen, W. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). Impacts of interactions between peer assessment and learning styles on students’ mobile learning achievements and motivations in vocational design certification courses. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1351–1363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1833351
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (Eds.). (2019). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge university press.
Jalilifar, A., & Hemmati, A. (2013). Construction of evaluative meanings by Kurdish-speaking learners of English: A comparison of high- and low-graded argumentative essays. Issues in Language Teaching, 2(2), 57-84. https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_1363_46ce400f40e54f3f07121049e5d7d896.pdf
Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2025). Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1265-1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7
Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Sociocultural theory and L2: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 67-109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002646
Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Sociocultural theory: A dialectical approach to L2 research. In S. M. Gass, & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 57-72). Routledge.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. Routledge.
Li, Q., & Chen, H. (2025). The psychology of pedagogical compromise: Written corrective feedback in Chinese EFL writing through an ecological systems lens. Acta Psychologica, 261, 105946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105946
Mehri, M., Amirian, Z., & Rezazadeh, M. (2023). The effect of regulatory focus and feference of comparison feedback on EFL learners’ achievement emotions and achievement goals. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 15(32), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.22034/ELT.2021.48394.2452
Mehri, M. (2024). Differential effects of non-linguistic feedback types on complexity, accuracy and fluency of EFL learners’ speaking performance in online education. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 16(34), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.22034/elt.2024.63744.2700
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004
Shapurian, R., & Hojat, M. (1985). Psychometric characteristics of a Persian version of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 57(2), 631-639. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1986.59.1.331
Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2019). Automated feedback and second language writing. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547.009
Takallou, F. (2025). The impact of Grammarly AI-powered writing tool on the EFL students’ writing proficiency and autonomy. Technology Assisted Language Education, 3(2), 99-119. https://doi.org/10.22126/TALE.2025.11107.1062
Topping, K. J., Gehringer, E., Khosravi, H., Gudipati, S., Jadhav, K., & Susarla, S. (2025). Enhancing peer assessment with artificial intelligence. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00501-1
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, C., Li, Z., & Bonk, C. (2024). Understanding self-directed learning in AI-Assisted writing: A mixed methods study of postsecondary learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100247
Winstone, N. E., & Boud, D. (2022). The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 656-667. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687
Yan, D. A., & Gao, Y. (2025). Effects of interactive vs. complementary approaches to integrating automated and peer feedback on L2 writers’ feedback quality and performance improvement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2569352
Yang, H., Gao, C., & Shen, H. Z. (2024). Learner interaction with, and response to, AI-programmed automated writing evaluation feedback in EFL writing: An exploratory study. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 3837-3858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11991-3
Yang, C. L., Uhde, A., Yamashita, N., & Kuzuoka, H. (2025). Understanding and supporting peer review using AI-reframed positive summary. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-16).
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Zhang, Y., & Gao, Y. (2024). Exploring the dynamics of student engagement with receiving peer feedback in L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 60, 100842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102025
Zhao, C. (2024). AI-assisted assessment in higher education: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 6(4), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.61414/jeti.v6i4.209
Zhu, H., & Amponstira, F. (2023). Impact of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Approach on English Teaching and Learning. Nimitmai Review Journal, 6(1), 38-55. https://so04.tcithaijo.org/index.php/nmrj/article/view/253705
Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y. (2023). When do students provide more peer feedback? The roles of performance and prior feedback experiences. Instructional Science, 51(6), 977-1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09640-w | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 237 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 30 |
||