| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,478 |
| تعداد مقالات | 18,036 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 58,458,518 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 19,825,545 |
بررسی روابط ساختاری میان نگرانیهای تدریس، باورهای خودکارآمدی و محیط یادگیری سازندهگرا در درس علوم از دیدگاه دانشجو معلمان دوره ابتدایی ایران | ||
| برنامه درسی و آموزش یادگیرنده محور | ||
| دوره 4، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 16، اسفند 1404، صفحه 39-56 اصل مقاله (813.72 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/cipj.2025.63507.1167 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| نازنین برهانزهی* 1؛ اصغر سلطانی2؛ بدرالسادات دانشمند3 | ||
| 1کارشناسی ارشد، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید باهنرکرمان، کرمان، ایران | ||
| 2استاد، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران | ||
| 3استادیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی روابط ساختاری میان نگرانیهای تدریس، باورهای خودکارآمدی و محیط یادگیری سازندهگرا در درس علوم از دیدگاه دانشجومعلمان دوره ابتدایی ایران بود. روش پژوهش: این پژوهش از نظر گردآوری دادهها، توصیفی و از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری را دانشجومعلمان رشته علوم تربیتی دانشگاه فرهنگیان استان سیستان و بلوچستان که تعداد آنان ۱۹۱۷ نفر بود، تشکیل میداد. ۳۷۱ دانشجو بر اساس فرمول کوکران با روش نمونهگیری تصادفی- طبقهای انتخاب شدند. به منظور گردآوری دادهها، دانشجومعلمان به پرسشنامههای نگرانیهای تدریس معلمان علوم (اقتباس از باز، ۲۰۰۸)، باورهای خودکارآمدی معلمان علوم (اقتباس از ایناکز و ریگز، ۱۹۹۰) و محیط یادگیری سازندهگرا (اقتباس از جانسون و مک کلر، ۲۰۰۴) پاسخ دادند. مقدار پایایی برای پرسشنامه نگرانیهای تدریس (0/83)، باورهای خودکارآمدی (0/79) و محیط یادگیری سازندهگرا (0/87) برآورد گردید. روایی پرسشنامهها نیز از طریق روش تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و تاییدی بررسی و مورد تایید قرارگرفت. یافتهها: نتایج نشان داد که در مجموع مدل پیشنهادی از برازش قابل قبولی برخوردار بود و دادههای بدستآمده از نمونه، مدل پیشنهادی را تایید کردند و تمام فرضیهها مورد تایید قرار گرفتند. نتیجهگیری: میان نگرانیهای تدریس، باورهای خودکارآمدی و محیط یادگیری سازندهگرا در درس علوم از دیدگاه دانشجومعلمان دوره ابتدایی رابطه معناداری وجود دارد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| نگرانیهای تدریس؛ باورهای خودکارآمدی؛ محیط یادگیری سازندهگرا؛ درس علوم؛ دانشجومعلمان دوره ابتدایی | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Andersen, A. M., & Dragsted, S., & Evans, R. H., & Sorenen, H. (2004). The relationship between changes in teachers self-efficacy beliefs and the science teaching environment of Danish first-year elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(1), 25-38. Anthony, L. W. L. (2008). Teacher Concerns about Curriculum Reform: The Case of Project Learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17(1), 75-97. Aydin, S., Boz. Y. (2010). Pre-Service Elementry Science Teachers Science Teaching efficacy Beliefs and Their Sources. Elementry Education Online, 9(2), 694-704. Aydin, S., & Boz, N., & Boz, Y. (2010). Factors that are Influential in Pre_Service Chemistry Teachers Choices of Instructional Strategies in the Context of Methods of Separation of Mixtures: A Case Study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(2), 251-270. Aydin, S., Boz, Y., Sungur. S, Cetin, G. (2012). Examination of Pre-service Chemistry Teachers Preferences for Creating Constructivist Learning Environment. H. U. Journal of Educatio, 42, 36-47. Aslan, A., & Sharma, U, & Deppeler, J. M. (2012). Exploring Pre-Service Teachers Perceivad Teaching-Efficacy, Attitudes and Concerns about Hnclusive Education in Bangladesh. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 8(2), 1-20. Abarshi, A., & Hosseini, Y. (2012). Structural equation modeling. Tehran: Jameh Shenasa. (In Persian) Anagun, S.S., & Anilan H. (2013). Development and validation of a modified Turkish version of the Teacher constructivist learning environment Survey (CLES). Learning Environ Res, 16, 169-182. Akinoglu, O. (2017). Pre-service Teachers Metaphorical Perceptions Regarding the Concept of Curriculum. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 263-278. Anagun, S. S. (2018). Teachers perception about the relationship between 21st century skills and Managing constructivist learning environment. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 825-840. Aybek, B., & Aslan, S. (2019). The Predictive Power of the Pre_Service Teachers Self_efficacy Beliefs upon Their Preparedness to Teach. International Education Studies, 12(9), 27-33. Aarts, R., & Kools, Q., & Schildwacht, R. (2020). Providing a good Start. Concerns of beginning secondary school teachers and support provided. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(2), 277-295. Berg, R. V. D., & Sleegers, P., & Geijsel, F., Vandenenberghe, R. (2000). Implementation Of an Innovation: Meeting the Concerns of Teaching. Studies in Education Evaluation, 26, 331-350. Bundura, A. (2005). Guide for constructing self_efficacy beliefs scale. 307-337. Boz, Y. (2008). Turkish Student Teachers Concerns About Teaching. European Journal Of Teacher Education, 31 (4), 367-377. Boz, Y., & Boz. N. (2010). The Nature of the Relationship between Teaching Concerns and Sense Of Efficacy. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33 (3), 279-291. Boz, Y., at el. (2016). Investigating the relationships among student’s self-efficacy beliefs, their perceptions of classroom learning environment, gender, and chemistry achievement through structural equation modeling. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(3), 307-324. Berg, D. A.G., & Smith, L. F. (2018). The effect of school-based presevice teachers self-efficacy beliefs. Issues in Educational Research, 28(3), 531-544. Boz. Y., & Cetin-Dindar. A. (2021). Teaching Concerns, Self_Efficacy Beliefs and constructivist learning Environment of Pre-Service Science Teachers: a modeling Study. European Jornal of Teacher Education, 2-19. Charlene, C. M, & Schriver, M. L. (1994). An examination of presevice science teachers beliefs and behavior as related to self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 5(3), 77-86. Cakiroglu, J. & Cakiroglu, E., & Boone, W. J. (2005). Pre_Service Teacher self_efficacy beliefs Regarding Science Teaching: A Comparison of Pre-Service Teachers in Turkey and the USA. SCIENCE EDUCATOR, 14(1), 31-40. Cakmak, M. (2008). Concerns about Teaching Process: Student Teachers Perspective. Educational Research Quarterly, 31(3), 57-77. Charalambous, C.Y, & Philippou, G.N. (2010). Teachers concerns and efficacy beliefs about implementing a mathematics curriculum reform: integrating two lines of inquiry. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75, 1-27. Cetin-Dindar, A., & Kirbulut, Z. D., & Boz, Y. (2014). Modeling between epistemological beliefs and constructivist learning environment. European Jornal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 479-496. Cetin-Dindar, A. (2016). Student Motivation in Constructivist Learning Environment. Eurasia Journal of Methemtics, Science & Technology Education, 12(2), 233-247. Dolatkhah, M. & Abdi, A. (2020). Examining the relationship between perception of constructivist learning environment and motivation to learn science among sixth-grade students in Paveh during the academic year. (2019–2020). Master’s thesis, Payame Noor University of Kermanshah. [In Persian] Enoghs, L.G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further Development of an Elementary Science Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument: A presevice Elementary Scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694-706. Ekizler, F., & Yayli, D. (2013). The relationship between teaching concerns and self-efficacy beliefs levels of pre-sevice and in-service teachers, 1-143. Ektem, I. S. (2016). A Study on Prospective Teachers Self-Efficacy Beliefs Regarding the Implementation of Constructivist Approach (A Case of Konya). Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(3). Ecevit, T., & Özdemir, P. (2020). Determination of Science and Primary Teachers' Teaching and Learning Conceptions and Constructivist Learning Environment Perceptions. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(3), 142-155. Ecevit, T., & Kingir, S. (2022). Primary Student Teachers' Teaching-Learning Conceptions, Attitudes and Self_efficacy Beliefs toward Science Teaching. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(3), 773-785. Fuller, F. F. (1974). Concerns of Teachers: Research and Reconceptualization. American Educational Research Journal. Ghaith, G. & K. Shaaban. (1999). The Relationship between Perceptions of Teaching concerns, Teacher Efficacy, and Selected Teacher Characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 487-496. Ghasemi, E., & Haghighi, S. R. (2015). The relationship between teaching concerns and sense of self-efficacy among iranian EFL pre-Service teachers. 1-101. Ghazala, N., & Arshad, T., & Muqadas, B. (2020). Effect of Constructivist Teaching Approach on Students Achievement in Science at Elementary Level. Pakistam Social Sciences Review, 4(3), 905-91. Garavand, H., & Ghabadian, M. (2021). Presenting a causal model of social constructivist learning environment and motivational orientations: The mediating role of self-efficacy beliefs and outcome expectations. Educational Psychology Studies Journal, 18(42). [In Persian] Gashmardi, N., & Motavasseli, G. (2022). Examining the relationship between novice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and attitudes toward teaching science. Proceedings of the 2nd Scientific ResearcherConference, pp. 1–12. [In Persian] Guo. C., & Hao. X., & Wu. J., & Hu. T. (2023). The Effect of National Higher Education initatives On University Rankings. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications. 1-9 Hand, B., & Treagust, D. F. (1995). Teachers concerns about implementing teaching/learning approaches Informed by constructivist. South Pasific Journal of Teacher Education, 23(2), 177-183. Hernandez, J. C. (2020). Examining Preservice Teachers Self-Efficacy Development Throughout Teacher Education. Doctor of Education. Johnson, B., & McClure, R. (2004). Validity and Reliability of Shortened Revised Version of the Constructivist learning environment survey. Learning Environment Research, 7, 65-80. Jafari, A, R., & Davatgeri A. H. (2015). Review of Constructivism and Social Constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Language, 1(1), 9-16. Kyriacou, C., & Stephens, P. (2010). Students teachers concerns during teaching practice. Evaluation and Research Education, 13(1), 18-31. Kingir, S., & Tas, Y., & Gok, G., & Vural, S. S. (2014). Relationship among constructivist learning environment perceptions, motivational beliefs, self_regulation and science achievement. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(3), 205-226. Kormos, J., & Nijakowska, J. (2017). Inclusive practices in teaching students with dyslexia: second language teachers concerns, attitudes and self_efficacy beliefs on a massive open online learning course. Teaching and Teacher Education, 68, 30-41. Kemal, O. E. (2020). The relationship between teacher self-efficacy beliefs and educational beliefs of pre-Service teachers. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(1), 8-18. Kruse, J. E. A. (2021). Inverstigating the Correlation Between Preservice Elementary Teachers Self-Efficacy and Science Teaching Practices. Journal Of Science Teacher Education. Karimi, V., & Taheri, F. (2021). Causal relationship between perception of learning environment and academic self-efficacy with the mediating role of academic engagement. New Strategies in Psychology and Educational Sciences Journal, 12, 96–106. [In Persian] Karimi, V., & Taheri, F. (2021). The mediating role of school belonging in the relationship between self-efficacy and perception of constructivist learning environment. Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Psychology (Science of Life). [In Persian] Masnavi, A., & Razavi, S. A. (2019). Predictability of students’ perceived feedback based on constructivist learning environment. Scientific Journal of the Ministry of Science, (2), 155–176(In Parsian). Menon, D. (2020). Influence of the Sources of Science Teaching Self-Eafficacy in Preservice Elementary Teachers Identity Development. Published in Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(4), 460-481. Menon, D., & Azam, S. (2021). Investigating Preservice Teachers Science Teaching Self-Efficacy: An Analysis of Reflective Practices. Published in International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 1587-1607. Ozaydin, I., & Cetin dindar, A. (2024). In-service and Pre-service Teachers Teaching Cocerns. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 5(2), 237-256. Pornpaka, C., & Chokchai, Y. (2014). Inverstigation of Constructivist Science Learning Environment in Thai Primary School. Mediterranean Journal of Social Schools, 27(5), 592-598. Rikers, R. M. J. P, at el. (2008). The effect constructivist learning environment: a commentary. Department of Psychology, 36, 463-467. Stair, K.S. et al (2012). Identifying Concerns of presevice and in_service Teachers in Agricultural Education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(2), 153-164. Shah, K. R., (2019). Effective Constrectivist Teaching Learning in the Classroom. International Journal of Education. 7(4), 1-13. Song, J., & Sharma, U., & Choi, H. (2019). Impact of teacher education on pre_service regular school teachers attitudes, intentions, concerns and self_efficacy about inclusive education in south Korea. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 2-9. Soe, T., & Than, N. (2020). The international between presevice science teachers conceptions of teaching and learning, learning approaches and self_efficacy beliefs. J. Myanmar Acod. Arts Sci, 18(9), 371-386. Temel, S. (2019). Examination Of Relationship Between Presevice Chemistry Teacher's Preferences for Creating Constructivist learning Environment and Sense of Efficacy. (2019). SHS Web of Conferences, 66. Triantafyllou, S. A. (2022). Constructivist learning environment. Research in Teaching and Education, 1-6. Velthuis, C, Fisser, P., & Pieters, J. (2013). Teacher Training and Pre_Service Primary Teacher's self_efficacy for Science Teaching. Elementary Science Teacher Education. Uredi, L. (2013). The effect of classroom teachers attitudes toward constructivist approach on their level of establishing a constructivist learning environment: A case of Mersin. Academic Journal, 8(11), 669-676. Willson, B. G. (2006). Constructivist learning environment: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Pub. Inc. Woodcock, S., & Hemmings, B., Kay, R. (2012). Does study of an inclusive education subject influence pre-Service teachers concerns and self_efficacy about inclusion?. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(6), 1-11. Zaheri, M, & Abdolmaleki, S, & Farjadmand, L. (2018). Examining the status of student-teachers’ understanding of the nature of science: A case study of teacher training centers. Curriculum Research Journal, (58), 79–94. [In Persian] Zare, Z, & Hasani F. J, & Ansari, R. P. (2019). Evaluation of curriculum quality of undergraduate biology teacher education program from the perspective of student-teachers. Research in Biology Education Journal, (4), 15–32. [In Persian] Zorilu, Y., & Zorilu, F. (2021). Investigation of The Relationship Between Preservice SciencTeachers 21st Century Skills and Science Learning Selr-Efficacy Beliefs With Structural Equation Model. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(1), 1-16. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 9 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 7 |
||