آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 18,594 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 60,953,826 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 21,761,880 |
The Myth of AI, The Future of Human Intelligence, and The Role of Philosophy | ||
| مجله پژوهش های فلسفی | ||
| دوره 20، شماره 54، بهمن 1404، صفحه 39-52 اصل مقاله (862.84 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jpiut.2026.21215 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| رابرت هانا | ||
| پژوهشگر مستقل، کانادا. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| In this essay, I argue (i) for the thesis I call dignitarian neo-luddism with respect to digital technology, which says not all digital technology is bad and wrong, but instead all and only the digital technology that harms and oppresses ordinary people (i.e., people other than digital technocrats), by either failing to respect our human dignity sufficiently or by outright violating our human dignity, is bad and wrong, and therefore all and only this bad and wrong digital technology should be rejected but not—except in extreme cases of digital technology whose coercive use is actually violently harming and oppressing ordinary people, for example, digitally-driven weapons or weapons-systems being used for mass destruction or mass murder—destroyed, rather only either simply refused, non-violently dismantled, or radically transformed into its moral opposite, also (ii) that the members of what I call “the military-industrial-digital complex” are systematically harming and oppressing ordinary people like us by not only enabling but also effectively mandating our excessive use of and addiction to digital technology, which in turn systematically undermines our innate capacities for thinking, caring, and acting for ourselves, and therefore undermines our human real personhood, and thereby violates our human dignity—therefore, we ought to ban all giant AI experiments and LLM/chatbot technology while they are still in their infancy, just as we ought to have banned all atomic bomb experiments and nuclear weapons technology while they were still in their infancy. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Digital Technology؛ Artificial Intelligence (AI)؛ Rational Human Intelligence؛ Existential Threats؛ Dignitarianism؛ Neo-Luddism Exist | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Block, N. (Ed.). (1980). Readings in the philosophy of psychology (Vol. 1). Harvard University Press. Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press. Chomsky, N., Roberts, I., & Watumull, J. (2023 March 8). Noam Chomsky: The false promise of ChatGPT. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/08/opinion/noam-chomsky-chatgpt-ai.html Cockburn, A. (2024, March). The Pentagon’s Silicon Valley problem. Harper’s Magazine. https://harpers.org/archive/2024/03/the-pentagons-silicon-valley-problem-andrew-cockburn/ Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What computers can’t do. MIT Press. Dreyfus, H. L. (1979). What computers can’t do (2nd ed.). MIT Press. Dreyfus, H. L. (1992). What computers still can’t do. MIT Press. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Blackwell. Glendinning, C. (1990). Notes toward a Neo-Luddite manifesto. The Anarchist Library. https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/chellis-glendinning-notes-toward-a-neo-luddite-manifesto Gödel, K. (1967). On formally undecidable propositions of Principia Mathematica and related systems (B. Meltzer, Trans.). In J. van Heijenoort (Ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931 (pp. 596–617). Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1931) Hanna, R. (2006). Rationality and Logic. MIT Press. https://www.academia.edu/21202624/Rationality_and_Logic Hanna, R. (2011). Minding the body. Philosophical Topics, 39(1), 15–40. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics20113912 Hanna, R. (2015). Cognition, content, and the a priori: A study in the philosophy of mind and knowledge (The Rational Human Condition, Vol. 5). Oxford University Press. https://www.academia.edu/35801833/The_Rational_Human_Condition_5_Cognition_Content_and_the_A_Priori_A_Study_in_the_Philosophy_of_Mind_and_Knowledge_OUP_2015_ Hanna, R. (2018). Deep freedom and real persons: A study in metaphysics (The Rational Human Condition, Vol. 2). Nova Science Publishers. https://www.academia.edu/35801857/The_Rational_Human_Condition_2_Deep_Freedom_and_Real_Persons_A_Study_in_Metaphysics_Nova_Science_2018_ Hanna, R. (2023a). "It's a human thing. You wouldn't understand." Computing Machinery and Affective Intelligence [Unpublished manuscript]. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/102664604/_Its_a_Human_Thing_You_Wouldnt_Understand_Computing_Machinery_and_Affective_Intelligence_June_2023_version_ Hanna, R. (2023b). Dignity, Notidentity [Unpublished manuscript]. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/96684801/Dignity_Not_Identity_February_2023_version_ Hanna, R. (2023c). In defence of dignity. Borderless Philosophy, 6, 77–98. https://www.cckp.space/single-post/bp6-2023-robert-hanna-in-defence-of-dignity-77-98 Hanna, R. (2025). Digital technology for humans: The myth of AI, human dignity, and Neo-Luddism. De Gruyter Brill. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111260525 Hanna, R., & Maiese, M. (2009). Embodied minds in action. Oxford University Press. https://www.academia.edu/21620839/Embodied_Minds_in_Action Hanna, R., & Paans, O. (2020). This is the way the world ends: A philosophy of civilization since 1900, and a philosophy of the future. Cosmos & History, 16(2), 1–53. https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/865 Hawkins, J. M., & Allen, R. (Eds.). (1991). The Oxford encyclopedic English dictionary. Oxford University Press. Keller, A. (2023, March 5). Artificial, but not intelligent: A critical analysis of AI and AGI. Against Professional Philosophy. https://againstprofphil.org/2023/03/05/artificial-but-not-intelligent-a-critical-analysis-of-ai-and-agi/ Kim, J. (2011). Philosophy of mind (3rd ed.). Westview Press. Landgrebe, J., & Smith, B. (2025). Why machines will never rule the world: Artificial intelligence without fear (2nd ed.). Routledge. Lovely, G. (2024). Can humanity survive AI? Jacobin, 52, 66–79. https://jacobin.com/2024/01/can-humanity-survive-ai/ Maiese, M., & Hanna, R. (2019). The mind-body politic. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24085-5 McGinn, C. (1989). Can we solve the mind–body problem? Mind, 98(391), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XCVIII.391.349 Searle, J. R. (1980a). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756 Searle, J. R. (1980b). Intrinsic intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 450–456. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00006537 Searle, J. R. (1984). Minds, brains, and science. Harvard University Press. Torday, J., Miller Jr, W. B., & Hanna, R. (2020). Singularity, life, and mind: New wave organicism. In J. Torday & W. B. Miller Jr, The singularity of nature (pp. 206–246). Royal Society of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781839160478-00206 Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433 Wikipedia. (2025). Military–industrial complex. Retrieved February 1, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military%E2%80%93industrial_complex | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 446 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 543 |
||