Iranian Teachers’ Philosophy of Technology: a stieglerian transcendental critique

Vahdati Daneshmand, Ali; Amiri, Mohammad

doi:10.22034/jpiut.2025.69937.4294

فهرست نشریات دارای اعتبار وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری

تعداد نشریات	45
تعداد شماره‌ها	1,510
تعداد مقالات	18,423
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	59,932,307
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	21,070,165

	Iranian Teachers’ Philosophy of Technology: a stieglerian transcendental critique
مجله پژوهش های فلسفی
دوره 19، شماره 53، دی 1404، صفحه 521-546 اصل مقاله (1.17 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی- پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jpiut.2025.69937.4294
نویسندگان
Ali Vahdati Daneshmand^* ¹؛ Mohammad Amiri²
¹Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophical and Social Foundations of Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
²MA in History and Philosophy of Education, Department of Education, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
The accelerated integration of digital technologies into education has renewed longstanding philosophical debates concerning the nature, role, and consequences of technology in schooling. While international scholarship has increasingly emphasized the importance of interrogating the philosophical assumptions underpinning teachers’ engagement with technology, little work has examined such orientations in the Iranian context. This qualitative study explores Iranian secondary school teachers’ implicit philosophies of educational technology and critically evaluates them through the conceptual frameworks of Andrew Feenberg’s philosophy of technology and Bernard Stiegler’s pharmacological perspective. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with twelve teachers and employing a hybrid deductive–inductive thematic analysis, this study identifies four Philosophical–Pedagogical Themes in Educational Technology (PPTET), each of which is revealed through the binary logic inherent in the pharmacological integration of technology in education. Through a Stieglerian reading, such dualisms are shown to obscure the constitutive and ambivalent nature of technological mediation in processes of teaching, learning, and individuation. The findings reveal a need to move beyond access-oriented and utilitarian narratives toward cultivating critical digital judgment and fostering pedagogical practices grounded in care, attention, and reflective technological engagement.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Philosophy of Technology؛ Educational Technology؛ Bernard Stiegler؛ Andrew Feenberg؛ Teacher Beliefs؛ Iran

مراجع
Al-e-Ahmad, J. (2001). Westoxification. Ferdows. Alombert, A. (2024). Bernard Stiegler: pour une pensée atranscendantale dans l’ère post-vérité. Le Portique(48-49), 75-95. https://doi.org/10.4000/13029 An, T., & Oliver, M. (2021). What in the world is educational technology? Rethinking the field from the perspective of the philosophy of technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(1), 6-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1810066 Bagheri Noaparast, K. (2002). Philosophy of technology and teaching technology. Journal of Psychology and Education, 32(1), 75-98. https://jpsyedu.ut.ac.ir/article_10621_0f1f1d345bfb778664ff2d2772beeed2.pdf Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 Carpenter, S. R. (1992). Instrumentalists and Expressivists: Ambiguous Links between Technology and Democracy. In L. Winner (Ed.), Democracy in a Technological Society (pp. 161-173). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1219-4_10 Chen, R.-J. (2011). Preservice Mathematics Teachers' Ambiguous Views of Technology. School Science and Mathematics, 111(2), 56-67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00061.x Christopoulos, A., & Sprangers, P. (2021). Integration of educational technology during the Covid-19 pandemic: An analysis of teacher and student receptions. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1964690. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1964690 Conseil national du numérique. (2014). Jules Ferry 3.0: Bâtir une école créative et juste dans un monde numérique. R. Canopé. https://www.vie-publique.fr/files/rapport/pdf/144000614.pdf Crevoisier, M. (2024). La philosophie atranscendantale de Bernard Stiegler. Le Portique (48-49), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.4000/13028 Delanty, G., & Harris, N. (2021). Critical theory and the question of technology: The Frankfurt School revisited. Thesis Eleven, 166(1), 88-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136211002055 Dusek, V. (2006). Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. Blackwell Publishing. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597 Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning Technology. Routledge. Feenberg, A. (2009). What is philosophy of technology? In International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 159-166). Brill. Ghasemi Pooya, E. (1998). Modern schools in Qajar period: Founders and pioneers. Nashre daneshgahi. Gonzalez-Mohino, M., Rodriguez-Domenech, M. Á., Callejas-Albiñana, A. I., & Castillo-Canalejo, A. (2023). Empowering Critical Thinking: The Role of Digital Tools in Citizen Participation. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 258-275. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1385 Haggerson, N. L. (1991). Philosophical Inquiry: Ampliative Criticism. In E. C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry (pp. 43-60). State University of New York Press. Heidenreich, F. (2022). Bernard Stiegler: Elements of Pharmacology: An interview with Felix Heidenreich and Florian Weber-Stein. The Politics of Digital Pharmacology: Exploring the Craft of Collective Care, 83-116. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839462492-006 Ihde, D. (2008). Introduction: postphenomenological research. Human Studies, 31, 1-9. Jang, J., Yoo, H., & Rubadeau, K. (2024). Indifferent, skeptical, ambivalent, moderate, and enthusiastic: What impacts profiles of teachers' technology views. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 100925. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100925 Kant, I. (1965). Critique of Pure Reason. Macmillan. Kennedy, B. L., & Thornberg, R. (2018). Deduction, Induction, and Abduction. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection (pp. 49-64). SAGE Publications Ltd. Khodaei, S., nasiri, F., & khalvandi, F. (2023). Identifying and examining indicators of educational justice in the Corona era from the perspective of primary school principals in Alborz province. Journal of Academic Management, 2(3), 19-11. https://doi.org/10.22034/jam.2023.62902 Kruger-Ross, M. J. (2013). Connecting Critical Theory of Technology to Educational Studies. Journal of Transformative Education, 11(4), 297-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344614538521 Lemmens, P. (2011). ‘This System Does not Produce Pleasure Anymore’. An Interview with Bernard Stiegler. Krisis\| Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, 31(1), 33-41. https://krisis.eu/article/view/39064/36843 Lemmens, P. (2022). Technologizing the Transcendental, not Discarding it. Foundations of Science, 27(4), 1307-1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09742-5 Mehrmohammadi, M. (2013). Speculative thoughts on education. Tarbiat Modarrres University. Nordlöf, C., Hallström, J., & Höst, G. E. (2019). Self-efficacy or context dependency?: Exploring teachers’ perceptions of and attitudes towards technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(1), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9431-2 Oliverio, S. (2020). The end of schooling and education for “calamity”. Policy Futures in Education, 18(7), 922-936. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210320944106 Oraldi, A. (2023). Technology and Society in Habermas' Early Social Theory: Towards a Critical Theory of Technology beyond Instrumentalism. Krisis, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.43.1.37753 Peters, M. A. (2006). Towards Philosophy of Technology in Education: Mapping the Field. In J. Weiss, J. Nolan, J. Hunsinger, & P. Trifonas (Eds.), The International Handbook of Virtual Learning Environments (pp. 95-116). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3803-7_3 Postman, N. (1995). The end of education: Redefining the value of school. Alfred A. Knopf. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition. Free Press. Rossing, J. P. (2012). Mobile technology and liberal education. Liberal Education, 98(1), 68-72. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ976725 Sajjadi, S. M. (2019). Philosophy of Technological Education or Technologic's Philosphy of Education: A Criticism of Educational Policymaking in Iran Higher Education. Foundations of Education, 8(2), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.22067/fedu.v8i2.72289 Seraji, F., Kasani, H. A., Abedi, H., & Sajedifard, M. (2020). Smart school project in Iran: Potentials and barriers. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4211-4230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10173-9 Smith, D. (2021). Stiegler’s Rigour: Metaphors for a Critical Continental Philosophy of Technology. Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology, 8(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/20539320.2022.2059980 Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and Time: The Fault of Epimetheus (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press. Stiegler, B. (2011). Technics and Time: Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise (Vol. 3). Stanford University Press. Stiegler, B. (2014). Symbolic Misery: The Hyperindustrial Epoch (Vol. 1). Polity. Stiegler, B. (2022). The Ordeal of Truth: Causes and Quasi-Causes in the Entropocene. Foundations of Science, 27(1), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09736-3 Stiegler, B., Grygielewicz, M., & Périn, N. (2020). The school of tomorrow. Journal of the CIPH, No 97(1), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.3917/rdes.097.0119 Stiegler, B., & Rogoff, I. (2010). Transindividuation. e-flux journal, 14. https://www.e-flux.com/education/features/625232/transindividuation Stiegler, B., & Ross, D. (2017). What Is Called Caring? Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 21(2/3), 386-404. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne201712479 Stiegler, B., & Ross, D. (2018). The Neganthropocene. Open Humanities Press. Supreme Council of Education. (2007). Information and Communication Technology Development Document in Education. Tehran: Supreme Council of Education of Iran Retrieved from https://www.dastour.ir/Brows/?lid=310772 Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121 Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Penn State University Press. Vlieghe, J. (2018). Stiegler and the Future of Education in a Digitized World. In P. Smeyers (Ed.), International Handbook of Philosophy of Education (pp. 417-428). Springer Verlag. Wambacq, J., Ross, D., & Buseyne, B. (2018). ‘We Have to Become the Quasi-cause of Nothing – of Nihil’: An Interview with Bernard Stiegler. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(2), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276416651932 Zarghami Saeed, Attaran Mohammad, Naghibzadeh Mirabdolhossein, & Khosrow, B. (2007). Examining philosophical views about the relationship between information technology and education. Educational Innovations, 6(1), 9-30. https://noavaryedu.oerp.ir/article_78815_f517485665db8a23016eb4185ed81f82.pdf
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 146 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 551

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب

پیوندهای مفید

آمار

Iranian Teachers’ Philosophy of Technology: a stieglerian transcendental critique