دانشگاه تبریز
فهرست نشریات دارای اعتبار وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری
پایگاه استنادی علوم جهان اسلام (ISC)

 آمار

تعداد نشریات45
تعداد شماره‌ها1,469
تعداد مقالات17,958
تعداد مشاهده مقاله58,287,620
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله19,747,586
مرادخانی, فردین. (1404). مشروطیت پوپولیستی و مفهوم قانون اساسی. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 16(39), 159-196. doi: 10.22034/law.2025.66635.3474
فردین مرادخانی. "مشروطیت پوپولیستی و مفهوم قانون اساسی". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 16, 39, 1404, 159-196. doi: 10.22034/law.2025.66635.3474
مرادخانی, فردین. (1404). 'مشروطیت پوپولیستی و مفهوم قانون اساسی', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 16(39), pp. 159-196. doi: 10.22034/law.2025.66635.3474
مرادخانی, فردین. مشروطیت پوپولیستی و مفهوم قانون اساسی. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1404; 16(39): 159-196. doi: 10.22034/law.2025.66635.3474

مشروطیت پوپولیستی و مفهوم قانون اساسی

مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی معاصر
دوره 16، شماره 39، شهریور 1404، صفحه 159-196    اصل مقاله (942.06 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/law.2025.66635.3474
نویسنده
فردین مرادخانی*
دانشیار، گروه حقوق، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان ایران
چکیده
قانون‌ اساسی‌ گرایی یا مشروطیت یکی از مفاهیم مهم دانش حقوق به‌ویژه در حقوق اساسی است. در خصوص این مفهوم برداشت‌های زیادی در اندیشۀ حقوقی شکل گرفته است. یکی از انواع این مفهوم، مشروطیت پوپولیستی است که در یک دهۀ اخیر مورد توجه پژوهشگران حقوقی قرار گرفته است. نگارندۀ این مقاله با روش توصیفی- تحلیلی و با تکیه بر مهم‌ترین منابع در خصوص این مفهوم و نیز مطالعۀ تطبیقی موضوع در کشورهای مختلف به‌دنبال پاسخ به این پرسش است که مشروطیت پوپولیستی چیست و چه ویژگی‌هایی دارد. قانون اساسی برای پوپولیست‌ها دارای معنایی متفاوت با معنای رایج آن در نزد حقوق‌دانان است.؛ از این رو، برخی موضوعات مندرج در قوانین اساسی مانند دادرسی اساسی و انتخابات و قوۀ قضائیه مستقل در اندیشۀ پوپولیستی دگرگون می‌شوند. نگاه مشروطیت پوپولیستی به قانون اساسی ابزاری است. آنها با تکیه بر مفهوم مردم سعی در حذف نهادهای واسطه همچون نمایندگی دارند و با اندیشه‌های مرتبط با دموکراسی به مخالفت برمی‌خیزند. همچنین کوشش شده است که نسبت مشروطیت پوپولیستی با مفاهیم نزدیک و هم‌مرزی چون مشروطیت سیاسی و مشروطیت مردمی مشخص گردد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
قانون اساسی؛ مشروطیت پوپولیستی؛ مشروطیت سیاسی؛ مشروطیت مردمی
مراجع
الف) منابع فارسی

- کتاب‌ها

  1. تاگارت، پل (1381). پوپولیسم. ترجمۀ حسن مرتضی. تهران: آشیان
  2. موفه، شانتال (1399). در دفاع از پوپولیسم چپ. ترجمۀ بهزاد نیاز آذری. تهران: قصیده سرا
  3. مولر، یان ورنر (1396). پوپولیسم چیست. ترجمۀ بابک واحدی. تهران: بیدگل
- مقالات

  1. عامری، زهرا و عامری، معصومه (1403). مطالعۀ تطبیقی سازوکارهای مشارکت عمومی در تعیین محتوای قانون اساسی. مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی معاصر، 15(35). 141-167.
Doi: 10.22034/LAW.2024.57310.3288

  1. خلیل‌زاده، محمد و جلالی محمد (1402). بازخوانی؛ مطالعۀ موردی نظام حقوقی ایاالت متحدۀ امریکا. مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی معاصر، 4(33). 34-71.
Doi: 10.22034/LAW.2023.55736.3250

ب) منابع انگلیسی

- Books

  1. bellamy, Richard (2007). Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Paul (2018). “Populist Constitutionalism”, in Routledge Handbook of Global Populism (Carlos de la Torre ed.) ‎Routledge university Pres
  3. Blokker, Paul (2013). New Democracies in Crisis? A Comparative Constitutional Study of the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. Routledge University Pres.
  4. Canovan, Margaret (2002). “Taking Politics to the People: Populism as the Ideology of Democracy”, In Democracies and the Populist Challenge.Yves Mény, Yves Surel Eds. Palgrave Macmillan
  5. Canovan, M. ‘Taking Politics to the People: Populism as the Ideology of Democracy’, in Yves Mény, Yves Surel (Eds), (1998). Democracies and the Populist Challenge, Palgrave Press
  6. Eisgruber, Christopher L. (2001). Constitutional Self-Government . Cambridge: Harvard University Press
  7. Pierre Ostiguy (ed.). (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford University Press
  8. Richard H. Jr. (2001). Implementing the Constitution. Harvard University Press.
  9. Fusaro, Carlo & Dawn Oliver, (2011). Towards a Theory of Constitutional Change’, in How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study (Dawn Oliver & Carlo Fusaro eds. Hart Publishing.
  10. Ernst. E a Shils (Translator), Edith Lowenstein, (2010). The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship. Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.; Lawbook Exchang ed. Edition.
  11. Gardbaum, Stephen, (2013). The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism: Theory and Practice .Cambridge University Press.
  12. Gyorfi, Tamas (2016). Against the New Constitutionalism (Elgar Monographs in Constitutional and Administrative Law). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  13. Kahn, Paul (2011). Political Theology: Four New Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Columbia University Press.
  14. Kaidatzis, Akritas, Eleni Kalampakou, Ifigeneia Kamtsidou. The People’s Constitution: The Populist Transformation of Constitutional Law? (Springer, 2024).
  15. Klug Heinz (2000). Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism and South Africa's Political Reconstruction. Cambridge University Press
  16. Kramer, Larry D. (2004). The People Themselves. Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review .New York: Oxford University Press.
  17. La Torre, Carlos de (2010). Populist Seduction in Latin America. Ohio University Press.
  18. Laclau, Ernesto (2005). On Populist Reason. Verso; Reprint Edition.
  19. Lefort, Claude (1986). The Political Forms of Modern Society Bureaucracy, Democracy, Totalitarianism. The MIT Press
  20. Mudde, Cas, Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press
  21. Müller, Jan-Werner (2016). What Is Populism? University of Pennsylvania Press.
  22. Müller, Jan-Werner (2018). “Populism and Constitutionalism”, in: Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo. Pierre Ostiguy (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Populism.oxford university press
  23. Papastylianos, Christos. (2024). Populism and Constitution Making Process. In European Union and Its Neighbours in a Globalized World. Springer Nature, 29-49
  24. Sajó, András, Renáta Uitz (2017). The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism. Oxford University Press
  25. Schmitt, Carl (2008). Constitutional Theory. Translated by Jeffrey Seitzer. Duke University Press 2008.
  26. Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo. Pierre Ostiguy (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism. oxford university press.
  27. Stambulski, Michał (2024). “Constitutional Populism Beyond the Liberal Framework. Adam Czarnota's Program for Sociology of Constitutions”. In: The Law is for the Citizens, so it Should Serve Them, W. Zomerski, F. Cyuńczyk, P. Eckhardt, M. Paździora, Scholar.
  28. Thornhill, Christopher (2017). “A Tale of Two Constitutions. Whose Legitimacy? Whose Crisis?” In Brexit: Sociological Responses (Key Issues in Modern Sociology) William Outhwaite ed. ‎Anthem Press.
  29. Tushnet, Mark (1999). Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  30. Tushnet, Mark (2018). “Comparing Right-Wing and Left-Wing Populism”, Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? .Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson & Mark Tushnet eds. Oxford University Press.
  31. Urbinati, Nadia (2014). Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People. Harvard University Press.
  32. Waldron, Jeremy (1999). Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  33. Urbinati, Nadia (2018). “Populism and the Principle of Majority”, in Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo. Pierre Ostiguy (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Populism. oxford university press.
  34. Young, Alison L. (2009). Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act. Hart Publishing.
- Articles

  1. Alexander, Larry (2005). Lawrence B. Solum Solum, “Popular? Constitutionalism?” Harvard Law Review. 118. 991-1006
  2. Antal, A. (2017). ‘The Political Theories, Preconditions and Dangers of the Governing Populism in Hungary’. Politologický Časopis-Czech Journal of Political Science, 24(1).
  3. Balkin, Jack M. (1995). “Populism and Progressivism as Constitutional Categories,” Yale Law Journal. 104 . 5-20
  4. Berlin, Isaiah “To Define Populism”, (1968), in The Isaiah Berlin Virtual Library. Available: http://berlin.wolf.ox.ac.uk/lists/ bibliograp­hy/bib111bLSE.pdf. 1-15.
  5. Blokker, Paul (2019). “Varieties of Populist Constitutionalism: The Transnational Dimension”. German Law Journal, 20(3), 332-350.
  6. Blokker, Paul (2019). “Populism as a Constitutional Project”. Paper Presented at the Workshop ‘Public Law and New Populism’, NYU School of Law. 296 – 313.
  7. Blokker, Paul (2005). “Populist Nationalism, Anti-Europeanism, Post Nationalism, and the East-West Distinction” German Law Journal, 6(2). 371-389.
  8. Blokker, Paul (2019). “Populism as a Constitutional Project”. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(2). 536-553.
  9. Brettschneider, Corey (2006). “Popular Constitutionalism and the Case for Judicial Review”. Political Theory. (34). 516-521.
  10. Brubaker, Rogers (2017). “Why Populism?” Theory and Society 46(5). 357-385.
  11. Brugger, Winfried (2003). “Communitarianism as the Social and Legal Theory Behind the German Constitution” International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2(3), 431-460.
  12. Simone (1998). “Contract or Conversation? Theoretical Lessons from the Canadian Constitutional Crisis”, Politics & Society. (26), 143-172.
  13. Couso, J. (2012). “Law, Rights and Social Change in Latin America: Competing Models of Constitutionalism in an Era of Uncertainty”, Available at: http://www.derecho.uba.ar/academica/posgrados/2012-javier-couso.pdf.
  14. Donelly, Tom (2012). “Making Popular Constitutionalism Work”. Wisconsin Law Review. Harvard Public Law, Working Paper. 160-193.
  15. Gee, Graham (2008). “The Political Constitutionalism of JAG Griffith”, Legal Studies. (28), 20-45.
  16. Goldoni, Marco (2014). “Political Constitutionalism and the Question of Constitution-Making,” Ratio Juris. (27), 387-408.
  17. Goldoni, Marco (2012). “Two Internal Critiques of Political Constitutionalism”, International Journal of Constitutional Law. (10), 926–949,
  18. Griffith, J.A.G. (1979). “The Political Constitution,” Modern Law Review. 42(1). 1-21.
  19. Halmai, Gábor (2018). “Is There Such Thing as ‘Populist Constitutionalism? The Case of Hungary”, Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(3). 323-339.  
  20. Gábor (2018). “The Abuse of Constitutional Identity. The Hungarian Constitutional Court on the Interpretation of Article E) (2) of the Fundamental Law”, Review of Central and East European Law, 43(1). 23-42. 
  21. Halmai, Gabor (2018). “Is There Such Thing as ‘Populist Constitutionalism’? The Case of Hungary”, Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. 11(3), 323-339.
  22. Halmai, Gábor (2019). “Populism, Authoritarianism and Constitutionalism”. German Law Journal, (20), 296-313.
  23. Hayden, Robert (1992). “Constitutional Nationalism in the Formerly Yugoslav Republics”, Slavic Review. (51), 654-673.
  24. Hiebert, Janet (2006). “Parliamentary Bill of Rights. An Alternative Model?”, Modern Law Review. (69), 7-28.
  25. Howse, Robert (2017). “Populism and Its Enemies”, Workshop on Public Law and the New Populism, Jean Monnet Center, NYU Law School, Sept. 296-313.
  26. Kaidatzi, Akritas (2019).“Populist/Popular/Political Constitutionalism”. IVR World Congress, Dignity, Democracy, Diversity, The 29th World Congress of the International Association for the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy–Workshop on Alternatives to Liberal Constitutionalism: Popular, Political, Deliberative, University of Lucerne, 11-12.
  27. Kaidatzis, Akritas (2018). “Populist Constitutionalism as a Critique on Liberal (or Legal) Constitutionalism”. Paper Submitted to the Workshop ‘New Constitutionalism? New Forms of Democracy and Rule of Law Beyond Liberalism’, International Institute for the Sociology of Law, Oñati 12-13.7. 1-18.
  28. Kavanaugh, Aileen (2003). “Participation and Judicial Review: A Reply to Jeremy Waldron” Law and Philosophy. (22), 451-486.
  29. Knowles, Helen J. & Julianne A. Toia. (2014). “Defining ‘Popular Constitutionalism’: The Kramer Versus Kramer Problem,” Southern University Law Review. 118(5). 1594-1640.
  30. Kramer, Larry D. (2005). “Undercover Anti-Populism”, Fordham Law. Revew. (73). 1343-1359.
  31. Kramer, Larry D. (2004). “Popular Constitutionalism”, California Law Review. (92). 959-1012.
  32. Kramer, Larry D. (2001). “The Supreme Court 2000 Term Forward: We the Court”, Harvard Law Review, (115). 4-169.
  33. Landau, David (2018). “Populist Constitutions”, University of Chicago Law Review: 85(2), 521-544.
  34. Landau, David (2013). “Abusive Constitutionalism” UC Davis Law Review. 47(1). 189-260.
  35. Law, David, S. & Mila, Versteeg (2013). “Sham Constitutions”, California Law Review,. (101). 863-952.
  36. Moyn, Samuel (2021). “On Human Rights and Majority Politics”, Vanderbilt Law Review. Vol. 52.
  37. Mudde & Crist´obál Rovira Kaltwasser (2013). “Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America”, Government and Opposition 48(2). 147-174.
  38. Mudde, C. (2013). ‘Are Populists Friends or Foes of Constitutionalism?’, The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society in Association with the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies and Wolfson College, University of Oxford http://www.fljs.org/sites/www.fljs.­org/files/publications/Mudde_0.pdf. 1-7.
  39. Nash, K. (2016). “Politicising Human Rights in Europe: Challenges to Legal Constitutionalism From the Left and the Right”. The International Journal of Human Rights, 20(8).
  40. Norris, Pipp (2017). “Is Western Democracy Backsliding? Diagnosing the Risks”, HKS Working Paper, No. RW, p. 17-012.1-26.
  41. Parker, Richard D. (1993). ‘Here, the People Rule’: A Constitutional Populist Manifesto,” Valparaiso University Law Review. Vol. 27 .531-584.
  42. Postt, Robert & Reva Siegelt (2004). “Popular Constitutionalism, Departmentalism, and Judicial Supremacy”. California La W Review. (92). 1027-1044.
  43. Pozen, David E. (2010). “Judicial Elections as Popular Constitutionalism,” Columbia Law Review. (110). 2047-2134.
  44. Roach, Kent (2004). “Dialogic Judicial Review and its Critics”, Supreme Court Law Review, (23)49, 49-104.
  45. Scheppele, Kim Lane (2004). ‘Counter-Constitutions: Narrating the Nation in Post-Soviet Hungary’, Paper Given at George Washington University, Washington DC, 2 April. 519-543.
  46. Scheppele, Kim Lane (2018). “Autocratic Legalism”, University of Chicago Law Review. (85). 545-584.
  47. Siegel, Jonathan R. (2012). “The Institutional Case for Judicial Review,” Iowa Law Review. (97). 1147-1199.
  48. Tushnet, Mark (2003). “Alternative Forms of Judicial Review”, Michigan Law. Reniew. (101). 2781-2802.
  49. Tushnet, Mark (2017). “The Possibility of Illiberal Constitutionalism”, Florida Law Review. (69).1367-1384.
  50. Tushnet, Mark (2015). “Constitutional Law: Critical and Comparative” Harvard Public Law Working Paper. No. 15-09.1-11.
  51. Tushnet, Mark (2013). “The Relation between Political Constitutionalism and Weak-Form Judicial Review”, Journals German Law Journal. 14(12). 2249-2263.
  52. Tushnet, Mark (2006). “Popular Constitutionalism as Political Law”, Chicago-Kent Law Review. (81). 991-1006.
  53. Urbinati, N. (1998). ‘Democracy and Populism,’ Constellations, 5(1). 110-124.
  54. Waldron, Jeremy (2006). “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review”, YALE Law. Journal. (115). 1346-1406.
  55. Waldron, Jeremy (2010). Constitutionalism-A Skeptical View http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/hartlecture/4. 1-46.
  56. Werhan, Keith (2012). “Popular Constitutionalism, Ancient and Modern”. University of California, Davis. (46). 65-131.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 38
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 53


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب