| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,469 |
| تعداد مقالات | 17,958 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 58,288,728 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 19,748,104 |
The Impact of Iranian EFL Teachers’ Meta-Pragmatic Awareness on Their Classroom Practices and Teaching Strategy Development | ||
| Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
| دوره 17، شماره 36، 2025، صفحه 255-278 اصل مقاله (990.78 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2025.68108.2804 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Behnood Samani1؛ Mehrdad Amiri* 2؛ Naser Ghafouri3 | ||
| 1Department of English Language Teaching, Sara. C., Islamic Azad University, Sarab, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of English Language Teaching, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Department of English Language Teaching, Tab. C., Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Instructing interlanguage pragmatics (ILP) is essential for effective second language communication. The present study set out to investigate the impact of Iranian English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers’ meta-pragmatic awareness on their classroom practices and developing strategies in teaching pragmatics. To do so, a qualitative study was designed in which 30 EFL teachers selected through convenience sampling from different districts of Tehran City took part. The participants’ classes were observed through an observation checklist three times during the semester, and live notes were taken in the classroom in terms of their teaching ILP practices and teaching strategy development both before and after an in-service meta-pragmatics training course awareness. The results of the observation data analysis showed the success of the in-service training course of meta-pragmatics. Furthermore, adopting an inductive approach in teaching pragmatics, correcting errors either after a delay or on the spot, and comparing L2 and L1 pragmatic features were among the most frequently used strategies teachers developed after being trained with respect to meta-pragmatics. The study results have some implications for foreign language teacher trainers, EFL teachers, and EFL learners. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Classroom Practices؛ EFL Teachers؛ Meta-Pragmatic Awareness؛ Pragmatics؛ Teaching Strategy Development | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alcón-Soler, E. A. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System, 33(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005 Alkawaz, A., Afrouz, M., Nejadansari, D., & Dabaghi, A. (2023). The effect of explicit pragmatic instruction on EFL students' production of speech acts: Pragmalinguistic vs. sociopragmatic errors in focus. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 15(31), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22034/elt.2023.54597.2521 Amiri, M., & Birjandi, P. (2015). Reliability and content validity of a comprehensive discourse completion test of interlanguage pragmatics for academic situations. Sino-US English Teaching, 12(9), 654–659. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2015.09.002 Amiri, M., & Javanshir, T. (2017). The effect of instruction type and pushed output tasks on young Iranian EFL learners’ pragmatic awareness. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 7(4), 202–221. Anis, M., & Anwar, C. (2020). Self-organized learning environment teaching strategy for ELT in Merdeka Belajar concept for high school students in Indonesia. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 5(2), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i2.869 Azizi, Z., & Namaziandost, E. (2023). Implementing peer-dynamic assessment to cultivate Iranian EFL learners' interlanguage pragmatic competence: A mixed-methods approach. International Journal of Language Testing, 13(1), 18–43. Bardovi‐Harlig, K. (2018). Teaching of pragmatics. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 17. 7(1), 1–16. Bardovi‐Harlig, K., Mossman, S., & Vellenga, H. E. (2015). Developing corpus‐based materials to teach pragmatic routines. Tesol Journal, 6(3), 499–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.177 Boulton, A. (2017). Corpora in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 50(4), 483-506. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000167 Canbolat, H. C., Atasoy, S., & Naiboğlu, B. (2021). The Effects of explicit pragmatic teaching on young learners' pragmatic development. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.34137/jilses.906273 Cheng, T. P. (2013). Codeswitching and participant orientations in a Chinese as a foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 869–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15404781.2013.12046.x Cheng, L.P., Gao, Y., Mao, H., & Peng, Y. (2024). Metapragmatic awareness development in Chinese Children: A conversational competence perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 231, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2024.07.013 Chiu, E. F.-Y., Chen, Y.-s., & Tai, H.-Y. (2022). Investigations into EFL students’ pragmatic and grammatical awareness through peer collaboration. Sustainability, 14(17), 10568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710568 Cohen, A. D. (2018). Learning pragmatics from native and nonnative language teachers (Vol. 123). Multilingual Matters. Cohen, A. D. (2019). Strategy instruction for learning and performing target language pragmatics. In A. U. Chamot & V. Harris (Eds.), Learning strategy instruction in the language classroom: Issues and implementation (pp. 140–152). Multilingual Matters. Cohen, A. D., Knight, S. W., & Sykes, J. M. (2023). Teachers gaining awareness of L2 pragmatics by means of an asynchronous professional development module. In A. Martínez-Flor, A. Sánchez-Hernández, & J. Barón (Eds.), L2 Pragmatics in Action: Teachers, learners and the teaching-learning interaction process (pp. 31–61). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.58 Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2023). Revisiting mixed methods research designs twenty years later. In C. N. Path (Ed.), Handbook of mixed methods research designs (pp. 21–36). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529614572.n6 Davarzani, F., & Talebzadeh, H. (2020). The effect of virtual and real classroom instruction on inter-language pragmatic development: microblogging versus traditional instruction of speech acts to Iranian EFL learners. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 13(27), 72–99. https://doi.org/10.30495/JAL.2021.680904 Derakhshan, A., Malmir, A., & Greenier, V. T. (2021). Interlanguage pragmatic learning strategies (IPLS) as predictors of L2 speech act knowledge: A case of Iranian EFL learners. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(1), 235–243 https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.1.14.235 Derakhshan, A., Malmir, A., Pawlak, M., & Wang, Y. (2024). The use of interlanguage pragmatic learning strategies (IPLS) by L2 learners: the impact of age, gender, language learning experience, and L2 proficiency levels. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 62(4), 1985–2008. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0132 Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2023). “The language is very formal and appropriate”: L2 learners’ in/appropriateness evaluations and metapragmatic judgments in student-faculty emails. Journal of Pragmatics, 217, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.09.001 Eslami, Z. R., & Eslami-Rasekh, A. (2008). Enhancing the pragmatic competence of non-native English-speaking teacher candidates (NNESTCs) in an EFL context. In E. Alcón Soler & A. Martínez-Flor (Eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 178–197). Multilingual Matters. Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005). Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. ELT Journal, 59(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci039. Farashaiyan, A., Sahragard, R., Muthusamy, P., & Muniandy, R. (2020). Questionnaire development and validation of interlanguage pragmatic instructional approaches and techniques in EFL contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(2), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n2p330 Farrell, A. (2017). The target English/es used by EFL teachers from Ireland: Current trends and perspectives (PhD dissertation), University of Limerick. https://doi.org/10.34961/8601 Gauci, P., Ghia, E., & Caruana, S. (2017). The pragmatic competence of student-teachers of Italian L2. Current issues in intercultural pragmatics, 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.274.15gau Ghavamnia, M., Tavakoli, M., & Rezazadeh, M. (2012). A comparative study of requests among L2 English, L1 Persian, and L1 English speakers. RAEL: Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada,10, 105–123. Glaser, K. (2020). Assessing the L2 pragmatic awareness of non-native EFL teacher candidates: Is spotting a problem enough? Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 16(1), 33–65. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp2020-0003 Glaser, K., & Martínez-Flor, A. (2024). Guest editorial: L2 pragmatics in language teacher education? Lodz Papers in Pragmatics: System,131, 103581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103581 González-Lloret, M. (2023). The road System travelled: Five decades of technology in language education. System, 118, 103124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103124 Hosseinpur, R. M., & Nevisi, R. B. (2018). L1-based Instruction: Does It work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(1), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.1.18.233 Ishihara, N. (2024). Fostering a translingual framework in teacher education focused on pragmatics: Identity and the multilingual turn in pragmatics pedagogy. System, 125, 103457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103457 Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2014). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Routledge. Kanık, M., Youbi, G. M., Sharon, T. T., & Kasapoğlu, M. The (Non-) Teaching of pragmatics in an EFL context. Journal of Language Education and Research, 9(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.31464/jlere.1221693 Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell. Li, X. (2022). Text classification of conversational implicatures based on lexical features. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 36(1), 3160–3175. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2022.2127598 Liu, M. H. (2023). Blended cross-tier language teacher development: designing online video-based pragmatic assessment. English Teaching & Learning, 47(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321021-00106-1 Liu, Y., Liu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2021). A pragmatic study on teachers' feedback in EFL classroom in China. English Language Teaching, 14(5), 109–123. LoCastro, V. (2012). Pragmatics for language educators: A sociolinguistic perspective. Routledge. Long, M. (2014). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley Blackwell. Mahmud, M. (2019). The use of politeness strategies in the classroom context by English university students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 597–606. http://eprints.unm.ac.id/id/eprint/20711 Martínez-Flor, A., Barón, J., & Sánchez-Hernández, A. (2023). L2 pragmatics in action. John Benjamins B.V. Meihami, H., & Khanlarzadeh, M. (2015). Pragmatic content in global and local ELT textbooks: A micro analysis study. Sage Open, 5(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015615168 Myrset, A., & McConachy, T. (2023). Incorporating pragmatics into primary English language teacher education. In D.Valente & D. Xerri (Eds.), Innovative practices in early English language education (pp. 305–327). Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-12922-3 Noviyenty, L. (2023). Non-native EFL lecturers’ strategies in building their pragmatics competence. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 7(2), 376–395. Nuzzo, E., & Brocca, N. (2024). Raising the (meta) pragmatic awareness of non-native pre-service teachers of L2 Italian with a telecollaborative data-driven learning project on formal email writing. System, 127, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103518 Prastikawati, E. F., Lestari, M. Y. W., & Asropah, A. (2024). Nurturing interlanguage pragmatic competence through dynamic assessment. Journal of English Education and Linguistics, 5(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.56874/jeel.v5i2.1999 Ren, W. (2022). Second language pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. Sadikov, E., & Abdusalimova, N. (2025). The implementation of communicative language teaching (CLT) in developing esl learnerslistening comprehension: a theoretical and pedagogical perspective. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 1(4), 1174-1178. https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai Saleem, A., Saleem, T., & Aziz, A. (2022). A pragmatic study of congratulation strategies of Pakistani ESL learners and British English speakers. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(8), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00134-9 Samani, B., Amiri, M., & Ghafouri, N. (2024). EFL teachers’ pragmatic awareness and classroom practices influenced by an in-service training course of meta-pragmatics. Curriculum Research Journal, 1(05), 14-44. https://doi.org/10.71703/cure.2024.1118645 Sanchez-Hernandez, A., & Martinez-Flor, A. (2022). Teaching the pragmatics of English as an international language: A focus on pragmatic markers. Language Teaching Research, 26(2), 256–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211064933 Sato, M., Thorne, S. L., Michel, M., Alexopoulou, T., & Hellermann, J. (2025). Language, people, classrooms, world: Blending disparate theories for united language education practices. The Modern Language Journal, 109(S1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12976 Silverstein, M. (1993). Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In J. A. Lucy (Ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics (pp. 33–59). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications Ltd. Tajeddin, Z. (2021). Toward critical applied pragmatics: Moving from postcolonial hegemony to decolonial pragmatics pedagogy. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language (TESL-EJ), 25(1), 1–21. Tajeddin, Z., & Alemi, M. (2021). Moving from cultural ethnocentrism to enthnorelativism through the affordance of English language learning experience. In M. Victoria & C. Sangiamchit (Eds.), Interculturality and the English language classroom (pp. 21–36). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Tajeddin, Z., Alemi, M., & Pashmforoosh, R. (2018). Idealized native-speaker linguistic and pragmatic norms in English as an international language: exploring the perceptions of nonnative English teachers. Language and Intercultural Communication, 18(3), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2017.1413105 Tateyama, Y. (2019). Pragmatics in a language classroom. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 400–412). Routledge. Usó-Juan, E., & Martínez-Flor, A. (2008). Teaching intercultural communicative competence through the four skills. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 21, 157-170. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2008.21.09 Webb, C. (2013). Teaching pragmatics to international students in private language schools in the UK. Contemporary English Teaching and Learning in Non-English-Speaking Countries, 2(2), 27-41, Retrieved September 23, 2025. http://www.Cetljournal.co.uk/ article/view/12171/8265 Wu, X. (2024). A literature review on teaching pragmatics in the EFL context: Challenges and implications. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 15(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.54097/09y5c855 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 165 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 38 |
||