| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,469 |
| تعداد مقالات | 17,958 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 58,287,741 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 19,747,652 |
Syllabus Design Knowledge (SDK) Among Iranian EFL Teachers: A Comparative Study of Novice and Experienced Teachers in Public High Schools and Private Language Institutes | ||
| Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
| دوره 17، شماره 36، 2025، صفحه 209-232 اصل مقاله (940.04 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2025.69512.2824 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mehdi Vaez-Dalili* 1؛ Farinaz Rahnamaei2؛ Bahram Hadian2 | ||
| 1Department of English, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of English, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This quantitative, causal-comparative study investigated differences in Syllabus Design Knowledge (SDK) between novice and experienced Iranian EFL teachers in public high schools and private language institutes. A sample of 120 EFL teachers, stratified into four equal groups (novice/experienced x public/private), completed a validated Syllabus Design Knowledge Test (SDKT). This 33-item instrument measured overall SDK and three related domains of SDK: theoretical/conceptual knowledge, knowledge of syllabus types, and knowledge of technical terminology. Data were analyzed using a set of two-way ANOVAS. The results revealed that both teaching experience and working in a private institute had significant, positive effects on EFL teachers’ overall SDK and their specific knowledge of different types of syllabi. By contrast, no statistically significant differences were found for theoretical/ conceptual knowledge or knowledge of technical terminology based on either experience or educational setting. The findings suggest that practical, context-driven experience in private institutes significantly enhances specific aspects of pedagogical content knowledge, while other, more theoretical components may be equally developed regardless of experience and educational setting. It is concluded that SDK is a complex construct, shaped by teaching experience and influenced by the specific institutional context. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Syllabus Design Knowledge (SDK)؛ Teaching Experience؛ Experienced Teacher؛ Novice Teacher؛ Institutional Context؛ Syllabus Type | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abhakorn, J. (2017). Language syllabus from student teachers’ perspectives. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 14(2), 175-186. Adoniou, M. (2015). Teacher knowledge: A complex tapestry. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(2), 116 - 99. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.932330 Almeida, S., & Viana, J. (2022). Teachers as curriculum designers: What knowledge is needed? The Curriculum Journal, 34(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.199 Amobi, F. (2006). Making it real: Promoting novice teachers’ critical perspectives on educational issues through structured debates. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v4i2.121 Anggraeni, A. A. F., & Rachmajanti, S. (2021). The needs of continuous professional development perceived by novice and experienced teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan (Education Journal: Theory, Research, and Development), 5(11), 1664-1670. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i11.14190 Atay, D. (2008). Teacher research for professional development. ELT Journal, 62 (2), 139-147. http://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl053 Bagherzadeh, R., & Tajeddin, Z. (2021). Teachers’ curricular knowledge in teacher education programs: A case of Iran’s sociocultural context. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 9(1), 43-57. Berliner, D. C. (2004). Describing the behavior and documenting the accomplishments of expert teachers. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604265535 Bratland, E., & El Ghami, M. (2021). The Janus face of professional knowledge: What organizational principles are behind the students’ perceptions of professional knowledge in new Norwegian teacher education? Education Research International, 11, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1253416 Breen, M. (1984). Process syllabus for the language classroom. In C. J. Brumfit (Ed.), General English syllabus design ELT document (pp. 47-60). Pergamon Press. Breen, M. (1987). Learner contributions to task design. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks. (pp. 23-46). Prentice-Hall. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass. Faravani, A. (2017). Issues in syllabus design. Brill. Farrell, T. S. C. (2012). Novice-service language teacher development: Bridging the gap between pre-service and in-service education and development. TESOL Quarterly, 46(3), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.36 Gatbonton, E. (2008). Looking beyond teachers’ classroom behavior: Novice and experienced ESL teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086286 Gitomer, D. H. & Zisk, R. C. (2015). Knowing what teachers know. Review of Research in Education, 39(1), 1-53. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X14557001 Goodson, I. (2003). Professional knowledge, professional lives: Studies in education and change. Open University Press. Grossman, P. L., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184-205. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312906 Huizinga, T., Nieveen, N. M., & Handelzalts, A. (2019). Identifying needs for support to enhance teachers’ curriculum design expertise. In J. Pieters, J. Voogt, & N. P. Roblin (Eds.), Collaborative curriculum design for sustainable innovation and teacher learning (pp. 115-137). Springer. Kasim, T. S. A. T., & Abdurajak, F. S. (2018). Pengalaman Pengajaran Guru Novis Pendidikan Islam: Implikasi Terhadap Reka Bentuk Kurikulum Latihan Pendidikan Guru (Islamic education novice teachers’ teaching experiences: Implications towards teacher training curriculum design). Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia (Malaysian Journal of Education), 43(1), 59-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JPEN-2018-43.01-08 Khoshhal, Y., & Babaee, H. (2017). Integrating traditional and critical approaches to syllabus design: A theoretical study. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(3), 16-26. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Language teacher education for a global society: A modular model for knowing, analyzing, recognizing, doing, and seeing. Routledge Liu, L., Jones, P., & Sadera, W. (2010). An investigation on experienced teachers’ knowledge and perceptions of instructional theories and practices. Computers in the Schools, 27(1), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560903536256 Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26(1), 27-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587368 Masuhara, H. (1993). What do teachers really want from course books? In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 239-260). Cambridge University Press. Nazari, N., Nafissi Z., Estaji, M. & Marandi, S. S. (2019). Evaluating novice and experienced EFL teachers’ perceived TPACK for their professional development. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1632010 Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus design. Oxford University Press. Pountney, R., & Swift, D. (2024). Teacher education and the curriculum. In E. Rata (Ed.), Research handbook on curriculum and education (pp. 280–291). Edward Elgar Publishing. Pourmohammadi, A., Sadighi, F., & Riasati, M. J. (2021). Iranian EFL teachers’ receptive and productive metalinguistic knowledge: Does teaching context matter? Cogent Education, 8(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1952823 Sahragard, R., & Saberi, L. (2018). The knowledgebase of pre-service and in-service Iranian EFL teachers in teacher education programs. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 445-466. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11428a Salman Sabbah, S. (2018). English language syllabuses: Definition, types, design, and selection. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 9(2), 127-142. Tajeddin, Z., Alemi, M., & Yasaei, H. (2018). Classroom assessment literacy for speaking: Exploring novice and experienced English language teachers’ knowledge and practice. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(3), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2018.120601 Valdman, A. (1978). Communicative use of language and syllabus design. Foreign Language Annals, 11(5), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1978.tb00728.x Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26-28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11431010 Walshaw, M. (2012). Teacher knowledge as fundamental to effective teaching practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(3), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9217-0 Yalden, J. (1987). Syllabus design: An overview of theoretical issues and practical implications. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 8, 30 - 47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500001008 Yazdanpanah, M., & Sahragard, R. (2017). A comparison of professional knowledge between expert and novice Iranian EFL teachers at Iranian language institutes and universities. Journal of Teaching English Language Studies, 6(2), 37-59. Zientek, L. R. (2006). Do teachers differ by certification route? Novice teachers’ sense of self-efficacy, commitment to teaching, and preparedness to teach. School Science and Mathematics, 106(8), 326-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb17752.x | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 4,828 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 29 |
||