آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,510 |
| تعداد مقالات | 18,423 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 59,932,279 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 21,070,136 |
Technology: From Serving the Teacher to Aspiring to Ruling; Is It Possible? | ||
| مجله پژوهش های فلسفی | ||
| دوره 19، شماره 53، دی 1404، صفحه 423-438 اصل مقاله (914.15 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jpiut.2025.68752.4167 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Seyyed Mahdi Sajjadi* | ||
| Professor of Philosophy of Education, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| A proper understanding of the teacher's status in the context of technology, especially new technologies such as artificial intelligence, requires an analysis of the philosophy of evolution of technology (nature and aims of technological developments) on the one hand and its relationship with the pedagogy and teacher on the other. In other words, the teacher's activity as a main factor in pedagogy has been a function of the philosophy of technological developments throughout history, and a proper understanding of this activity also requires a precise understanding of the nature and aims of technological developments. Accordingly, here we first refer to the stages of technological evolution and its meaning and functions, and then we discuss the impact of these stages of evolution on the role and activity of the teacher in the pedagogical process. The question that this article wants to answer is whether artificial intelligence, as the last stage of technological evolution that wants to replace the teacher in pedagogy, can replace it or not, and if not, what is the solution for the teacher and artificial intelligence to be able to function simultaneously? | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Artificial Intelligence؛ Technology؛ Techne؛ Teacher؛ Pedagogy؛ Serving؛ Ruling؛ Balancing؛ Integration | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Chandler, D. (1996). Engagement with Media: Shaping and Being Shaped, Computer mediated Communication Magazine, February. No.4. p.7 Chase, C. C., Chin, D. B., Oppezzo, M. A. & Schwartz, D. L. (2009). Teachable agents and the protégé effect: Increasing the effort towards learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, p. 344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9180-4 Devika, K. U. (2025). AI and Teachers: Partner in Education, Not Replacement. International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management and Applied Science. 14 (4), 678. https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.140400077 Dijk, T. A. (2012). Discourse and Knowledge. The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, London: Routledge. Eikeland, O. (2014). Techne. the Encyclopedia of Action Research. Sage Publications. Fan, S. (2019). Will AI replace us? A primer for the 21st century. London: Thames & Hudson. Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical Theory of Technology, New York: Oxford University Press, p.94 Gehlen, A. (2003). A Philosophical-Anthropological Perspective on Technology, Oxford: Blackwell. Latour, B. (2014). Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene. New literary history, 45(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1353/NLH.2014.0003 Masters, K. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and the Death of Academic Author. Medical Teacher. Published online: 47(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2523463. Mc Luhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man. New York: Mentor.P.9 McQuail, D. (1994). Mass Communication theory, An Introduction. SAGE Publications Ltd. Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking Through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. Peachey, N. (2021). Human Teachers vs. AI Teachers – Which is best? Peachey Publications. Sajjadi, S. M. (2016). Virtual Space and Reconceptualization in Religious Education Components: Challeng and Unknowen Necessirties in Educational Policy. Quarterly Journal of Research in School and Virtual Learning. 2(14), 24. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.23456523.1395.4.14.2.0 Sajjadi, S. M. (2023). Deterritorialization: The logic of Education. Tehran, Ayande Amoozan Press. Sharifzadeh, R. (2020). Do artifacts have morality? Bruno Latour and ethics of technology. Philosophy of Science. 2(18), 75. https://sid.ir/paper/390662/fa Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing Knowledge. Amazon Smith, D. W. (2018). Deleuze, Technology, and Thought. Taking Review. 49(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.6184/THR201812-3 Ruiz, P. & Fusco, J. (2022). Teachers partnering with artificial intelligence: Augmentation and automation. Digital Promise. https://digitalpromise.org Tin, H., Myae, A. C & New, T. T. (2025). AI vs. Human Teachers: A Comparative Survey on the Potential for Substitution in Education. Indian Journal of Science and Research. Vol.5 Issue.3. p. 89. Verbeek, P. P. (2010). Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Verbeek, P. P. (2008). Cyborg Intentionality – Rethinking the Phenomenology of Human-Technology Relations, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097008-9099-x Waelbers, K. & Dorstewitz, P. (2013). Ethics in Actor Networks, or: What Latour Could Learn from Darwin and Dewey, Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s119480129408-1 Wang, S. & Hartselle, T. (2012). Technology Integration and Foundations for Effective Leadership, University of Mississippi, USA. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 330 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 190 |
||