
تعداد نشریات | 45 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,406 |
تعداد مقالات | 17,246 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 55,708,835 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 17,891,072 |
تاثیر روش استفاده از باکتریهای محرک رشد گیاه بر رشد، عملکرد و جذب عناصر غذایی کاهوی فرانسوی در شرایط آبکشت | ||
دانش کشاورزی وتولید پایدار | ||
دوره 35، شماره 2، تیر 1404، صفحه 187-202 اصل مقاله (756.66 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/saps.2024.57866.3093 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
اصغر اکبرزاده1؛ صاحبعلی بلندنظر* 2؛ محمدرضا ساریخانی3؛ زهرا رنجوری1 | ||
1دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد علوم ومهندسی باغبانی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز | ||
2گروه علوم ومهندسی باغبانی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز | ||
3گروه علوم خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز | ||
چکیده | ||
مقدمه و اهداف: امروزه برای دستیابی به تولید حداکثر محصول، استفاده از پتانسیل میکروبی خاک بویژة باکتریهای محرک رشد گیاه اجتنابناپذیر است، باکتریهای محرک رشد با ارتقای کارایی جذب عناصر غذایی، تقویت سیستم ریشهای و افزایش مقاومت گیاه در برابر تنشهای محیطی، میتوانند به بهبود رشد و کیفیت محصول کمک کنند. هدف از آزمایش حاضر بررسی کاربرد چند باکتری محرک رشد گیاه و نحوه کاربرد آنها بر رشد، عملکرد و جذب عناصر غذایی در کاهو در آبکشت بود. مواد و روش ها: بدین منظور برای بررسی تاثیر باکتریهای محرک رشد گیاه با نصف غلظت محلول غذایی هوگلند بر خصوصیات رشدی و جذب عناصر غذایی کاهوی فرانسوی در شرایط هیدروپونیک، آزمایشی گلدانی بهصورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار اجرا شد. فاکتور اول کاربرد باکتریهای محرک رشد گیاه شامل (Pseudomonas sp. C16-2O، Enterobacter cloacae S16-3 وEnsifer sp. 3MDP-1) و فاکتور دوم نحوه استفاده از باکتریهای فوق (بهصورت محلولپاشی برگی، اضافه کردن به بستر کاشت و استفاده همزمان از دو روش) بود. یافتهها: استفاده از باکتری 3MDP-1 به صورت اضافه کردن در بستر به همراه برگپاشی، منجر به بیشترین وزن تر بوته (05/169 گرم)و بیشترین تعداد برگ (66/27) شد. روش استفاده باکتریهای محرک رشد گیاه چه به صورت استفاده همزمان، یا کاربرد برگپاشی نتیجه بهتری بر سطح برگ (به ترتیب 15/2852 و 2/2781 سانتیمترمربع) نسبت به روش اضافه کردن در بسترداشت. کاربرد همزمان باکتری C16-2O، در قسمت هوایی و ریشه بیشترین تاثیر را بر وزن تر (96/25 گرم) و خشک (46/3 گرم) ریشه نشان داد. تیمار اضافه کردن در بستر به همراه برگپاشی باکتری C16-2O، منجر به تولید بیشترین کلروفیل کل برگ کاهو (8/35) و خاصیت آنتی اکسیدانی برگ کاهو (16/0 میکروگرم بر میلیگرم) گردید، در حالیکه همه صفات در شاهد کمتر از تیمار با باکتریها بود. نتیجهگیری: نتایج این آزمایش علاوه بر اثبات اثرات محرک رشدی باکتریها در گیاهان تلقیح شده نسبت به شاهد بدون تلقیح، نشان داد که استفاده همزمان باکتریها به صورت برگپاشی و کاربرد در بستر (تلقیح ریشه) اثرات مثبت باکتریها را تشدید مینماید. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
برگ پاشی؛ کود زیستی؛ کاهو؛ کلروفیل؛ هیدروپونیک | ||
مراجع | ||
Ahmad M, Nadeem SM, Naveed M and Zahir ZA. 2016. Potassium-solubilizing bacteria and their application in agriculture. Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture, 293(2): 313-325. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2776-2_21 Ajit NS, Verma R and Shanmugam V. 2006. Extracellular chitinases of fluorescent Pseudomonads antifungal to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. dianthi causing carnation wilt. Current Microbiology, 52(4): 310-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-005-4589-3 Akiyoshi DE, Regier DA and Gordon MP. 1987. Cytokinin production by agrobacterium and pseudomonas spp. Journal of Bacteriology, 169(9): 4242-4248. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.169.9.4242-4248.1987 Batoolv T, Ali S, Seleiman MF, Naveed NH, Ali A, Ahmed K and Mubushar M. 2020. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria alleviates drought stress in potato in response to suppressive oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes activities. Scientific Reports, 10(1): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73489-z Bolandnazar S, Khorsandi S and Adlipor M. 2014. The effect of biological fertilizer (fertilizer phosphate 2) on the yield and some qualitative traits of edible onion (Allium cepa L.). Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 24(2): 19-30. (In Persian with English Abstract). Bolandnazar S, Karimi K and Sarikhani M. 2020. The effect of plant growth stimulating bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the physiological traits of Iranian leek (Allium ampeloprasum L.). Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 29(1): 121-136. (In Persian with English Abstract). https://doi.org/10.22034/ws.2021.44215.2402 Cardoso IM and Kuyper TW. 2006. Mycorrhizas and tropical soil fertility. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 116(1-2): 72-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.03.011 Chang CH and Yang SS. 2009. Thermo-tolerant phosphate-solubilizing microbes for multi-functional biofertilizer preparation. Bioresource Technology, 100(4): 1648-1658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.009 Chen Y, Mei R, Lu S, Liu L and Kloepper JW. 1994. The use of yield increasing bacteria as PGPR in Chinese agriculture. Management of soil borne diseases, Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, India. Dehghani Bidgoli R and Ghiaci Yekta M. 2019. Investigating the effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (Pseudomonas putida R112) on essential oil of Rosmarinus officinalis L. under irrigation of urban purified wastewater. Journal of Medicinal Plants, 18(72): 212-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/jmp.4.72.S12.212 Dobbelaere S, Vanderleyden J and Okon Y. 2003. Plant growth-promoting effects of diazotrophs in the rhizosphere. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 22(2): 107-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/713610853 Dursun A, Ekinci M and Dönmez MF. 2010. Effects of foliar application of plant growth promoting bacterium on chemical contents, yield and growth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Pakistan Journal Botany, 42(5): 3349-3356. Ebrahimi A, Moaveni P and Farahani HA. 2010. Effects of planting dates and compost on mucilage variations in borage (Borago officinalis L.) under different chemical fertilization systems. International Journal for Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Research, 1(5): 58-61. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBMBR.9000014 Egamberdiyeva D. 2007. The effect of plant growth promoting bacteria on growth and nutrient uptake of maize in two different soils. Applied Soil Ecology, 36(2-3): 184-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.02.005 El-Tantawy ME and Mohamed MAN. 2009. Effect of inoculation with phosphate solubilizing bacteria on the tomato rhizosphere colonization process, plant growth and yield under organic and inorganic fertilization. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 23(2): 1117-1131. http://dx.doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2020.90225 Esitken A, Yildiz HE, Ercisli S, Donmez MF, Turan M and Gunes A. 2010. Effects of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) on yield, growth and nutrient contents of organically grown strawberry. Scientia Horticulturae, 124(1): 62-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.12.012 Fatemi H. 2020. Effect of bio-Priming with plant growth promoting bacteria on growth and biochemical characteristics, phenol, flavonoid, vitamin C and nitrate in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Rabicon cultivar in different growth substrates. Journal of Soil and Plant Interactions, 11(2): 41-59. (In Persian). http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/jspi.11.2.18741 Hasanzadeh Ghorttapeh A and Javadi, H. (2016). Study on the effects of inoculation with biofirtilizers (Azotobacter and Azospirillum) and nitrogen application on oil, yield and yield components of spring canola in West Azerbaijan. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 5(18): 39-50. (In Persian with English Abstract). http://dx.doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jcpp.5.18.39 Jones Jr JB. 2016. Hydroponics: a practical guide for the soilless grower. CRC press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780849331671 Kavino M, Harish S, Kumar N, Saravanakumar D and Samiyappan, R. 2010. Effect of chitinolytic PGPR on growth, yield and physiological attributes of banana (Musa spp.) under field conditions. Applied Soil Ecology, 45(2): 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.02.003 Kloepper JW, Lifshitz R and Zablotowicz RM. 1989. Free-living bacterial inocula for enhancing crop productivity. Trends in Biotechnology, 7(2): 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7799(89)90057-7 Khaldbrin B and Eslamzade T. 2001. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Shiraz University press, 495. (In Persian with English Abstract). Koleva II, Van Beek TA, Linssen JP, Groot AD and Evstatieva LN. 2002. Screening of plant extracts for antioxidant activity: a comparative study on three testing methods. Phytochemical Analysis: An International Journal of Plant Chemical and Biochemical Techniques, 13(1): 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/pca.611 Lebeda A, Ryder EJ, Grube R, Dolezalova I and Kristkova E. 2007. Lettuce (Asteraceae; Lactuca spp.). Genetic Resources, Chromosome Engineering and Crop Improvement, 3(1): 377-472. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420009569.ch9 Lee KJ, Oh BT and Seralathan KK. 2013. Advances in plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for biological control of plant diseases. Bacteria in Agrobiology: Disease Management, 111(2): 120-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18357-7_1 Lin JY and Tang CY .2007. Determination of total phenolic and flavonoid contents in selected fruits and vegetables, as well as their stimulatory effects on mouse splenocyte proliferation. Food Chemistry, 101(1): 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.01.014 Liu X, Ardo S, Bunning M, Parry J, Zhou K, Stushnoff C and Kendall P. 2007. Total phenolic content and DPPH radical scavenging activity of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown in Colorado. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 40(3): 552-557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2005.09.007 Lucy M, Reed E and Glick BR 2004. Applications of free-living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 86(1): 1-25. http://doi.org/10.1023/B:ANTO.0000024903.10757.6e Mahajan A and Gupta RD.2009. Integrated nutrient management (INM) in a sustainable rice and wheat cropping system. Food Chemistry, 73(5): 578-584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9875-8 Maurhofer M, Reimmann C, Schmidli-Sacherer P, Heeb S, Haas D and Défago G.1998. Salicylic acid biosynthetic genes expressed in Pseudomonas fluorescens strain P3 improve the induction of systemic resistance in tobacco against tobacco necrosis virus. Phytopathology, 88(7): 678-684. http://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.7.678 Mhatre PH, Karthik C, Kadirvelu K, Divya KL, Venkatasalam EP, Srinivasan S and Shanmuganathan, R. 2019. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): A potential alternative tool for nematodes bio-control. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 17(4): 119-128. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.11.009 Neshat M, Abbasi A, Hosseinzadeh A, Sarikhani MR, Dadashi Chavan D and Rasoulnia, A. 2022. Plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPR) induce antioxidant tolerance against salinity stress through biochemical and physiological mechanisms. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 28(2): 347-361. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-022-01128-0 Ordookhani K, Khavazi K, Moezzi A and Rejali, F. 2010. Influence of PGPR and AMF on antioxidant activity, lycopene and potassium contents in tomato. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(10): 1108-1116. http://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR09.183 Patten CL and Glick, B. R. 2002. Regulation of indoleacetic acid production in Pseudomonas putida GR12-2 by tryptophan and the stationary-phase sigma factor respons. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 48(7): 635-642. http://doi.org/10.1139/w02-053 Penrose DM and Glick BR. 2003. Methods for isolating and characterizing ACC deaminase‐containing plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria. Physiologia Plantarum, 118(1): 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00086.x Rashid M, Khalil S, Ayub N, Alam S and Latif, F. (2004). Organic acids production and phosphate solubilization by phosphate solubilizing microorganisms (PSM) under in vitro conditions. Pakistan Journal Biological Sciences, 7(2): 187-196. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2004.187.196 Sandhya V, Ali SZ, Grover M, Reddy G and Venkateswarlu, B. 2010. Effect of plant growth promoting Pseudomonas spp. on compatible solutes, antioxidant status and plant growth of maize under drought stress. Plant Growth Regulation, 62(1): 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-010-9479-4 Sarikhani MR, Aliasgharzad N and Khoshru, B. 2020. P solubilizing potential of some plant growth promoting bacteria used as ingredient in phosphatic biofertilizers with emphasis on growth promotion of Zea mays L. Geomicrobiology Journal, 37(4): 327-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2019.1700323 Sarikhani MR, Oustan S, Ebrahimi M, Aliasgharzad N. 2018. Isolation and identification of potassium-releasing bacteria in soil and assessment of their ability to release potassium for plants. European Journal of Soil Science, 69: 1078–1086. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12708 Sarikhani MR, Malboobi MA and Ebrahimi M. 2014. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria: isolation of bacteria and phosphate solubilizing genes, mechanism and genetics of phosphate solubilization. Agricultural Biotechnology Journal, 6(1): 77-110. https://doi.org/10.22103/JAB.2014.1294 Sarikhani MR and Amini R. 2021. Biofertilizers in sustainable agriculture. A look at biofertilizers research in Iran. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 29(1): 119-126. (In Persian with English Abstract). https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.24764310.1399.30.1.20.1 Satisha, J and Prakash GS.2006. The influence of water and gas exchange parameters on grafted grapevines under conditions of moisture stress. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 27(1): 40-45. https://doi.org/10.21548/27-1-1476 Savvas D and Adamidis, K. (1999). Automated management of nutrient solutions based on target electrical conductivity, pH, and nutrient concentration ratios. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 22(9): 1415-1432. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169909365723 Schippers B, Bakker AW, Bakker PAHM and Van Peer R. 1990. Beneficial and deleterious effects of HCN-producing pseudomonads on rhizosphere interactions. Plant and Soil, 129(1): 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011693 Sheikh alipor P, Bolandnazar S, Sarikhani M and Panahande J. 2019. The effect of biofertilizer application on yield, quality and antioxidant capacity of tomato fruit. Horticultural Sciences of Iran. 50(3): 921-622. (In Persian with English Abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijhs.2018.255420.1434 Soundy P, Cantliffe DJ, Hochmuth GJ and Stoffella, P. J. 2001. Nutrient requirements for lettuce transplants using a floatation irrigation system. I. Phosphorus. Horticultural Science, 36(6): 1066-1070. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.36.6.1066 Spaepen S, Dobbelaere S, Croonenborghs A and Vanderleyden, J. 2008. Effects of Azospirillum brasilense indole-3-acetic acid production on inoculated wheat plants. Plant and Soil: 312(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9560-1 Sudhakar P, Chattopadhyay GN, Gangwar SK and Ghosh, JK. 2000. Effect of foliar application of Azotobacter, Azospirillum and Beijerinckia on leaf yield and quality of mulberry (Morus alba). The Journal of Agricultural Science, 134(2): 227-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859699007376 Sugumaran P and Janarthanam, B. 2007. Solubilization of potassium containing minerals by bacteria and their effect on plant growth. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(3): 350-355. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wjas.2007.3.3.1607826 Tabatabai SJ. 2009. Principles of Plant Mineral Nutrition. University of Tabriz Press. 296-298. (In Persian with English Abstract). Variation in growth and ion uptake of maize due to inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria under stress. Soil and Environment, 25(2): 78-84. Velazhahan R, Samiyappan R and Vidhyasekaran, P. 1999. Relationship between antagonistic activities of Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates against Rhizoctonia solanii and their production of lytic enzymes. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 11(1): 244-250. Vernieri P, Borghesi E, Tognoni F, Serra G, Ferrante A and Piagessi A. 2006. Use of biostimulants for reducing nutrient solution concentration in floating system. In III International Symposium on Models for Plant Growth, Environmental Control and Farm Management in Protected Cultivation, 718: 477-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.718.55 Zhao Y. 2010. Auxin biosynthesis and its role in plant development. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 61: 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112308 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 67 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 40 |