Design as a School of Ethics: A Hegelian Approach to Moral Life in Designers

Borgianni, Y., Dixon, B., Ekwaro-Osire, S., Nespoli, O.G., Summers, J. D., Wan, T., & Zeng, Y. (2023). Domain-Independent Design Theory and Methodology to Boost the Adoption of Design Methods. J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci., 26, 235-246.

Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360152681056

Cash, G. M., & Dorst, K. (2023). Method in their madness: Explaining how designers think and act through the cognitive co-evolution model. Design Studies, 88, Article 101219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101219

Chan, J. K. H. (2018). Design ethics: Reflecting on the ethical dimensions of technology, sustainability, and responsibility in the Anthropocene. Design Studies, 54, 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.09.005

Chivukula, S. S., Watkins, C. R., Manocha, R., Chen, J., & Gray, C. M. (2020). Dimensions of UX practice that shape ethical awareness. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–13). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376459

Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. MIT Press.

Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Berg.

Dindler, C., Krogh, G., Tikær, K., & Nørregård, P. (2022). Engagements and articulations of ethics in design practice. International Journal of Design, 16(2), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.57698/v16i2.04

Ehn, P. (2008). Participation in Design Things. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference onParticipatory Design 2008 (pp. 92–101). Indianapolis, IN, USA: Indiana University. (PDF) Participatory Design and Design for Values. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278713757_Participatory_Design_and_Design_for_Valu

Fahlquist, J. N., Doorn, N., & van de Poel, I. (2014). Design for the value of responsibility. In J. van den Hoven, E. Vermaas, & I. van de Poel (Eds.), Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design (pp. 1–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6994-6_18-1

Friedman, B., Kahn, H., Jr., & Borning, A. (2002). Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. University of Washington Technical Report, 02–12.

Fry, T. (2012). Becoming human by design. Berg.

Gray, C. M., & Chivukula, S. S. (2019). Ethical mediation in UX practice. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI ’19 (pp. 1–11). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300408

Hansson, S. O. (Ed.). (2017). The ethics of technology – Methods and approaches. Rowman & Littlefield International.

Hardimon, M. O. (1994). Hegel’s Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Hassan, F. J. (2023). Defining the design process: Methodology and creation, J. Des. Text., 2(1), 20–35, https://doi.org/10.32350/jdt.21.02

Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of Spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1807)

Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). Elements of the philosophy of right (A. W. Wood, Ed.; H. B. Nisbet, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1821)

Ho, Amic. G. (2010). Exploring the Relationships between Emotion and Design Process for Designers today.

Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts (J. Anderson, Trans.). MIT Press.

Houlgate, S. (2005). An introduction to Hegel: Freedom, truth and history (2nd ed.). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470776583

Kuutti, K., & Bannon, L. J. (2014). The turn to practice in HCI: Towards a research agenda. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI ’14 (pp. 3543–3552). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557111

Lawson, B. (2005). How Designers Think: The design process demystified (4^th ed.). Routledge.

Lindberg, S., Karlström, & Männikkö-Barbutiu, S. (2020). Cultivating ethics – A perspective from practice. In Proceedings of the 11^th Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society – NordiCHI ’20, October 25–29, 2020 (Tallinn, Estonia). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420064

Lindberg, S., Karlström, P. and Männikkö Barbutiu, S. (2023) Cultivating ethics with professional designers, in Holmlid, S., Rodrigues, V., Westin, C., Krogh, P. G., Mäkelä, M., Svanaes, D., Wikberg-Nilsson, Å (eds.), Nordes 2023: This Space Intentionally Left Blank, 12-14 June, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden. https://doi.org/10.21606/nordes.2023.48

Mahmoud, N. E., Kamel, S. M., & Hamza, T. S. (2020). The relationship between tolerance of ambiguity and creativity in architectural design studio. Creativity Studies, 13(1), 179-198. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.9628

Molaei, P., Javaherian, M., & Afzalipour, M. (2021). Principles of flexibility in design process, with the approach to creativity in design. A|Z ITU, Journal of The Faculty of Architecture, 18(3), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2021.66742

Nelius, Thomas; Doellken, Markus; Zimmerer, Christoph; Matthiesen, Sven (2020). The impact of confirmation bias on reasoning and visual attention during analysis in engineering design: An eye tracking study. Design Studies, 71, 100963–. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.100963

Nissenbaum, H. (1996). Accountability in a computerized society. Sci Eng Ethics 2, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02639315

Ozkaramanli, D. (2024). Moral Engagement in Design: Five Considerations for Unpacking the Ethical Dimensions of Design Methods. Design Issues, 40 (3), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00774

Papanek, V. (1970). Design for the Real World, London. Thames & Hudson: 215–48.

Pinkard, T. (2017). Does History Make Sense? Hegel on the Historical Shapes of Justice. Harvard University Press.

Pippin, R. B. (2008). Hegel's practical philosophy: rational agency as ethical life. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Redding, P. (2020). Hegel’s philosophy of right. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/hegel-right/

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Shilton, K. (2013). Values levers: Building ethics into design. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38(3), 374–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912436985

Spiekermann, S., & Winkler, T. (2020). Value-based engineering for ethics by design. Nature Electronics, 3, 230–232. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.13676

Suchman, L. (2000). Making A Case: "Knowledge" and"Routine" work in document production, in Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practiceand Informing System Design, Luff, J. Hindmarsh, and C. Heath (eds.), Cambridge, UK: CUP, pp. 29-45.

Tonkinwise, C. (2014). How We Intend to Future: Review of Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby, Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. Design Philosophy Papers, 12(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.2752/144871314X14159818597676 

van Gorp, A., & van de Poel, I. (2001). Ethical considerations in engineering design processes. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 20(3), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/44.952761

van Wynsberghe, A., & Robbins, S. (2014). Ethicist as designer: A pragmatic approach to ethics in the lab. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(4), 947–961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9498-4

Verbeek, P. P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226852904.001.0001

Walsh, K. D. (2007). On equilibrium: Reflections on practice development and the philosophy of John Ralston Saul. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 8(3), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2007.00314.x

Wood, A. (1990). Hegel’s ethical thought. Cambridge University Press.

Zeng, D., Long, Y. xin, Miao, J. jing, & Bao, G. yi. (2024). Using linkography to understand the thinking differences of designers between engineering and art backgrounds in the early stages of the design process. Journal of Engineering Design, 35(8), 996–1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2024.2355752