آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,469 |
| تعداد مقالات | 17,958 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 58,289,691 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 19,748,696 |
The Influence of Mother Tongue on the Use of English Resumptive Pronouns by Iranian EFLLs | ||
| Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
| دوره 17، شماره 36، 2025، صفحه 181-194 اصل مقاله (763.16 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2025.67077.2783 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Hamed Mowlei-Kuhbanani* 1؛ Hamdollah Ravand2؛ Parvaneh Maazallahi3؛ Amir-Hossein Mokhtari4 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, English Language Department, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Iran. | ||
| 3Assistant Professor. Department of Translation Studies, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Iran. | ||
| 4MA Graduated in Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Understanding and producing relative clauses (RCs) presents significant challenges for second language learners, particularly when L1 and L2 relativization strategies differ. This study investigated the effect of Persian (L1) on resumptive pronoun (RP) usage in English RCs by Iranian EFL learners (N = 90 English Literature and Translation Studies majors), examining the Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy Hypothesis (NPAHH). The study had two primary objectives. First, we hypothesized that lower-proficiency learners would demonstrate more negative transfer. Participants were categorized into high- and low-proficiency groups using the Oxford Placement Test. Results revealed significant between-group performance differences, though error patterns based on the RC head's grammatical function were similar across groups. Both groups showed highest accuracy for object-function RCs, suggesting strong L1 influence. Second, testing the NPAHH revealed that learners (regardless of proficiency) exhibited lowest error rates for object-position RCs, followed by subject, complement, and genitive positions. This pattern partially aligns with but does not exactly match the NPAHH's predicted difficulty hierarchy (subject > object > complement > genitive). The findings highlight how L1 transfer interacts with universal accessibility constraints in RC acquisition. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy؛ Relativization Strategies؛ Resumptive Pronoun؛ Relative Clause | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdolmanafi, S. and Rahman, A. (2012). An Investigation of the Learnability of Relative Clauses by EFL Learners. World Journal of English Language. 2 (3). PP 29-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v2n3p29.
Asudeh, A. (2011). Resumption and Composition. Presented at linguistics conference in Mayfest, University of Maryland, 2-29.
Asudeh, A. (2007). Three kinds of resumption. Presented in Resumptive Pronouns at the Interfaces. Paris: France, 81-96.
Aoun, Y. Choueiri, L. and Hornstein, N. (2001). Resumption, movement, and derivational economy. Linguistic Inquiry, 32 /3, 371–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/002438901750372504.
Beltrama, A. Xiang, M. (2016). Unacceptable but comprehensible: the facilitation effect of resumptive pronouns, Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 10 (1), 1-29. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5334/gjgl.24.
Bennett, R. E., Rock, D. A., & Wang, M. (1991). Equivalence of free-response and multiple-choice items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28(1), 77-92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1434686.
Bettoni, C. and Di Biase, B. (2015). grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Process ability Theory. Eurosla Monograph Series. Amsterdam: The European.
Cho, S. (2002). The Acquisition of English relative clauses by Korean Adults: Evidence for Universal Grammar in Second Language Acquisition, The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 10(3), 157-170. https://childstudies.org/journal/view.php?number=2091.
Diessel, H. (2004). The Acquisition of Complex Sentences. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1017/CBO9780511486531.008.
Diessel, H. Tomasello, M. (2001). The Development of Relative Clauses in Spontaneous Child Speech. Cognitive Linguistics 11(1). 25-48. http://dx.doi.org/:10.1515/cogl.2001.006.
Doughty, C. J. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469. http://dx.doi.org/:10.1017/S0272263100010287.
Eckman, F. Lawrence, B. Nelson, D. (1988). On the Generalization of Relative clause instruction in the Acquisition of English as a Second Language. Applied linguistics, 9 (1), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/9.1.1.
Ellis, N. C. (2008). The Dynamics of Second Language Emergence: Cycles of Language Use, Language Change, and Language Acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 92, 232-249.
Enjavinezhad, M., Paramasivam, Sh. (2014). Interlanguage Syntax of L2 Persian Speakers: The Case of Resumptive Pronoun in English Relative Clauses. International Journal of Education and Research. 2/10. 277-288.
Farsi, M. Zarei, L. (2013). Practical Contrastive Analysis of English and Iranian with especial emphasis on relative clauses, Time Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 7-19. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.30479/jmrels.2019.10509.1314.
Gass, S. Selinker, L. (2001). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. University of Turku: Publications of the Department of Phonetics.
Gass, S. (1979). Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning, 29, 327-344. http://dx.doi.org/:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1979.tb01073.
Geranpayeh, A. (2003). A quick review of the English Quick Placement Test. UCLES Research Notes. On the Relative Value of Multiple‐Choice, Constructed Response, and Examinee‐Selected Items on Two Achievement Tests, Journal of Educational Measurement 31(3):234 – 250, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1994.tb00445.
Gibson, E., Desmet, T., Grodner, D., Watson, D., Ko, K. (2005). Reading relative clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics. 16/2. 313-353. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.2.313.
Hancock, G. R. (1994). Cognitive complexity and the comparability of multiple-choice and constructed-response test formats. The Journal of Experimental Education, 62(2), 143–157 https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1994.9943836.
Jang, J. D. (2005). Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy amongst Korean EFL Students. The Journal of Linguistic Science. 12 (34), 293-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070131.
Keenan, E. (1985). Relative Clauses. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keenan, E. Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 63–99. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2307/413321.
Keroeger, P. (2005). Analyzing Grammar: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Khalifa, M.F. (2018). Contrastive analysis, error analysis, markedness theory, universal grammar and monitor theory and their contributions to second language learning. International journal of linguistics, 10 (1), 12-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijl. v10i1.12479.
Kidd, E., & Bavin, E. L. (2002). English-speaking children's comprehension of relative clauses: Evidence for general-cognitive and language-specific constraints on development. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(6), 599–617. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021265021141.
Kuno, S. (1974). The position of relative clauses and conjunctions. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 117-136.
Lehmann, C. (1986). On the Typology of Relative Clauses. Linguistics. 24(4), 663-680. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1515/ling.1986.24.4.663.
Lukhele, R., Thissen, D., & Wainer, H. (1994). On the relative value of multiple-choice, constructed response, and examinee-selected items on two achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(3), 234–250. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1435268.
Marefat, H., Abdollahnejad, E. (2008). Acquisition of English Relative Clauses by Adult Persian Learners: Focus on Resumptive Pronouns. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS). 73/4. 19-40. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.22099/jtls.2014.1858.
McCloskey. (2002). Resumption, successive cyclist, and the locality of operations. In Samuel David Epstein and T. Daniel Seeley, eds., Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, 184–226. Oxford: Blackwell.
McCloskey. (2006). Resumption. In Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, Eds, The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mowlaei, H. (2021). Typological Study of Resumptive Pronouns in Persian Relative Clause. Journal of Linguistics and Khorasan Dialects, 13(1), 113-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.22067/jlkd.2021.70621.1033.
Pavesi, M. (2008). Spoken language in film dubbing: Target language norms, interference and translational routines. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/btl.78.10pav.
Pienemann, M. (1999). A unified Approach toward the Development of Swedish as L2: A Processability Account. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.21 (3), 383-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199003022.
Pienemann, M. (2007). Process ability theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Wil Liam (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 137-154). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pienemann, M. and Johnston, J. (1987). On the primacy of theory in applied studies. Second Language Research. 12( 3). 35-63, https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839601200303.
Rouveret, A. (2011). Resumptive Pronouns at the Interfaces. Université Paris-Diderot & LLF, CNRS. https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.5.
Saric, L. (2016). Identity, impoliteness and integration in online immigration discourse. Linguistics Applied, 5(3). 75-100. https://doi.org/10.36575/2353-2912/1 (8)2020.075.
Sells, P. (1984). Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Sichel, I. (2014). Resumptive pronouns and competition. Linguistic Inquiry .45, 655- 693. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43695662.
Sheldon, A. (1974). On the role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 272-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S00225371(74)80064-2.
Spinner, P. and Jung, S. (2018). Production and Comprehension in process ability Theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 40(2):1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000110.
Wainer, H., & Thissen, D. (1992). Combining multiple-choice and constructed response test scores: Toward a Marxist theory of test construction. ETS Research Report Series, 1992(2), i–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170748.
Walstad, W. B., & Becker, W. E. (1994). Achievement differences on multiple-choice and essay tests in economics. American Economic Review, 84(2), 193–196. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cbafacpub/34. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 311 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 23 |
||