معرفی مدل اجزای محدود آدمک ترکیبی III 50 درصد و اعتبارسنجی عددی و تجربی مطابق با استاندارد ECER16

[1]           Albert DL, Beeman SM, Kemper AR. Occupant kinematics of the Hybrid III, THOR-M, and postmortem human surrogates under various restraint conditions in full-scale frontal sled tests. Traffic injury prevention. 2018 Feb 28;19(sup1):S50-8.

[2]           Jones DA, Gaewsky JP, Saffarzadeh M, Putnam JB, Weaver AA, Somers JT, Stitzel JD. Multidirection validation of a finite element 50th percentile male hybrid III anthropomorphic test device for spaceflight applications. Journal of biomechanical engineering. 2019 Mar 1;141(3):031004.

[3]           Xu T, Sheng X, Zhang T, Liu H, Liang X, Ding A. Development and validation of dummies and human models used in crash test. Applied bionics and biomechanics. 2018;2018(1):3832850.

[4]           Kirkpatrick SW, MacNeill R, Bocchieri RT. Development of an LS-DYNA occupant model for use in crash analyses of roadside safety features. InTransportation Research Board 82nd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, Jan 2003 Jan 12 (pp. 12-16).

[5]           Eshraghi S, Severson K, Hynd D, Perlman AB. Finite Element Model Validation of the Hybrid-III Rail Safety (H3-RS) Anthropomorphic Test Device (ATD). InASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition 2018 Nov 9. 52187, V013T05A011). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

[6]           Mohan P, Marzougui D, Kan CD. Development and validation of hybrid III crash test dummy. SAE Technical Paper; 2009 Apr 20.

 [7]          Jensen MR, Honaker M, Boglaev A. CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION OF DETAILED HYBRID III 50 TH PERCENTILE MALE ANTHROPOMORPHIC TEST DEVICE (ATD) BASED ON EXTENSIVE MINE BLAST TESTS. In2017 NVDIA Ground Vehicle Systems Engineering and Technology Symposium, Modeling and Simulation, Testing and Validation (MSTV) Technical Session 2017 Aug 8.

[8]           Ambrosio J, Carvalho M, Milho J, Escalante S, Martin R. A validated railway vehicle interior layout with multibody dummies and finite element seats models for crash analysis. Multibody System Dynamics. 2022 Feb;54(2):179-212.

[9]           Yu M. Finite element analysis of passenger multiple belt restraint configurations (Master's thesis, Wake Forest University).

[10]         Valdano M, Jiménez-Octavio JR, López-Valdés FJ. The Effect of Seatbelt Pretensioners and Load Limiters in the Reduction of Mais2+ and Mais 3+ Injuries in Real-World Frontal Crashes. Available at SSRN 4398931.

[11]         Brumbelow ML, Baker BC, Nolan JM. Effects of seat belt load limiters on driver fatalities in frontal crashes of passenger cars. InInternational Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Paper 2007 Jun 18 (No. 07-0067).

[12]         Hellenbrand C, Brown JF, Goodworth A. The Impact of Seat Belt Pretensioner Deployment on Forward-Leaning Occupants. SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety. 2023 Sep 20;11(09-11-02-0019):197-203.

[13]         Li N, Fang H, Zhang C, Gutowski M, Palta E, Wang Q. A numerical study of occupant responses and injuries in vehicular crashes into roadside barriers based on finite element simulations. Advances in Engineering Software. 2015 Dec 1;90:22-40.

[14]         Van Arsdell WW, Weber P, Stankewich C, Larson B, Hoover R, Watson R. Load-Limiters Effect on Occupant Restraint System Performance. SAE Technical Paper; 2016 Apr 5.

 [15]        Pan L, Ramavath S, Jung SH, Hernandez L, Frank R, Truong H, Song Y. Efficiency Improvement of Seat Belt Pull CAE Analysis by Technology and Process Changes. 2018.