
تعداد نشریات | 45 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,388 |
تعداد مقالات | 17,007 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 54,725,457 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 17,275,927 |
An Introspective Analysis of Appropriacy Indices in ELT Curriculum Policy and Practice | ||
Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
دوره 17، شماره 35، مهر 2025، صفحه 397-420 اصل مقاله (991.92 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2025.65590.2741 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Atta Ghasem Tahimash؛ Reza Khani* ؛ Reza Shahi | ||
Department of English Language Teaching, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
The present study aimed to explore how the ELT curriculum is perceived, adopted, and implemented by EFL high school teachers. This study also shed some light on several effective factors in curriculum planning and practicing. Data for this study came from a survey and follow-up interviews with EFL teachers. The Findings revealed some critical systemic gaps between policy and practice: (1) a disconnect between policymaking processes and established ELT pedagogical theories; (2) insufficient incorporation of stakeholder voices, particularly teachers, during policy formulation; (3) neglect of teacher agency, professional needs, and motivational factors in curriculum design; and (4) an absence of foundational needs analysis research to inform policy decisions. The study underscores the imperative of prioritizing teacher autonomy, participatory policymaking, and evidence-based frameworks in curriculum development. To mitigate disparities between policy objectives and classroom practices, recommendations include decentralizing decision-making to empower educators, integrating teacher feedback into policy cycles, leveraging academic expertise, and fostering context-sensitive adaptations of global ELT methodologies. These insights contribute to broader regional discussions on educational equity, teacher professionalization, and sustainable language policy reforms in institutional settings. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Curriculum Planning؛ Curriculum Practice؛ ELT Teachers؛ ELT policies | ||
مراجع | ||
Akbari, R., & Dadvand, B. (2014). Pedagogical knowledge base: A conceptual framework for teacher admission. System, 42, 12-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.001 Al-Issa, A. S. (2007). The Implications of Implementing a Flexible' Syllabus for ESL Policy in the Sultanate of Oman. RELC Journal, 38(2), 199-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033688207079352 Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56(1), 57-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.1.57 Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Curriculum development: Teacher involvement in curriculum development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 106-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.7176/JEP/7-9-12 Atai, M. R., Babaii, E., & Mazlum, F. (2012). Mainstream ELT curriculum implementation in Iran: A micro analysis perspective. TELL, 6(2), 1-23. Atai, M. R., & Mazlum, F. (2012). English language teaching curriculum in Iran: Planning and practice. The Curriculum Journal, 24(3), 389-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2013.788682 Babaii, A. (1997). Content analysis of high school English book 3. Unpublished MA thesis. Islamic Azad University of Khorasgan, Isfahan, Iran. Bantwini, B. D. (2010). How teachers perceive the new curriculum reform: Lessons from a school district in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(1), 83-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.07.001 Beh-Afarin, S. R. (2007). EFL teacher development in Iran. ILI Language Teaching Journal, 3(1), 33-50. Bajelan, G. (2004). Why the goals defined for English are not realized in high schools of Lorestan. Research Department of the Ministry of Education, Tehran, Iran. Bekalo, S., & Welford, G. (2000). Practical activity in Ethiopian secondary physical sciences: implications for policy and practice of the match between the intended and implemented curriculum. Research Papers in Education, 15(2), 185-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02671520050019835 Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Chambers, G. (2019). Pupils’ perceptions of Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 3 transition in modern foreign languages. The Language Learning Journal, 47(1), 19-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1576822 Channa, L. A. (2014). English medium for the government primary schools of Sindh, Pakistan: An exploration of government primary school teachers' attitudes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia). Cheung, A. C., & Wong, P. M. (2012). Factors affecting the implementation of curriculum reform in Hong Kong: Key findings from a large‐scale survey study. International Journal of Educational Management. 26(1), 39-54 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513541211203568 Chowdhury, R., & Kabir, A. H. (2014). Language wars: English education policy and practice in Bangladesh. Multilingual Education, 4(1), 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-5059-4-21 Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1999). Cultural mirrors: materials and methods in the EFL classroom. In E. Hinkel, Culture in second language teaching. Cambridge University Press. 196-219. Connelly, F. M., & Lantz, O. C. (1991). Definitions of curriculum: An introduction. In A. Lewy (Ed.), The International encyclopedia of curriculum (Vol. V, pp. ur.). Tel Aviv. Doukas, E. (1995). Teacher identified factors affecting the implementation of an EFL innovation in Greek public secondary schools. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 8(1),53-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07908319509525147 Doukas, K. (2014). Evaluating the implementation of educational innovations: Lessons from the past. In Managing evaluation and innovation in language teaching: Building Bridges (pp. 25-50). Routledge. Daud, A., & Gunawan, H. (2019). The Implementation of 2013 Curriculum in English Teaching: Stories from Rural Areas. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 1(2), 65-75. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1288209 Esteves, M. (2003). Curriculum flexibility: Critical questions to teachers, schools, teacher educators and researchers. Galloway, N., & Numajiri, T. (2020). Global English’s Language Teaching: Bottom‐up Curriculum Implementation. TESOL Quarterly, 54(1), 118-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tesq.520 Ghorbani-Nezhad, T. (1999). Iranian students’ performance on end-of-the-year English exams and on National Entrance Exam for Universities: A comparison. Journal of the Faculty of Letters and Humanities, 32(1), 303-316. Haddad, W., & Demsky, T. (1994). The dynamics of education policymaking: Case studies of Burkina Faso, Jordan, Peru, and Thailand (Vol. 10). World Bank Publications. Hardman, J., & A-Rahman, N. (2014). Teachers and the implementation of a new English curriculum in Malaysia. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27(3), 260-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.951051 Ion, G., & Iucu, R. (2015). Does research influence educational policy? The perspective of researchers and policy-makers in Romania. In The European Higher Education Area (pp. 865-880). Springer, Cham. Iranmehr, A., & Davari, H. (2018). English language education in Iran: A site of struggle between globalized and localized versions of English. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 1(2), 94-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/IJCE.2018.87725 Kabilan, M. K., & Veratharaju, K. (2013). Professional development needs of primary school English-language teachers in Malaysia. Professional Development in Education, 39(3), 330-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.738682 Kamyabfard, M. (2002). Content analysis of high school English book 2 based on teachers’ and students’ views in District 14 of Tehran. (Unpublished Master's Thesis), Islamic Azad University. Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., & Chan, K. S. J. (2006). Reforming the Curriculum in a Post-Colonial Society: The Case of Hong Kong1. Planning and Changing, 37(1), 111-130. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ756219 Kirkgöz, Y. (2009). Globalization and English language policy in Turkey. Educational Policy, 23(5), 663-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0895904808320579 Kiany, G. R., Mirhosseini, S. A., & Navidinia, H. (2011). Foreign Language Education Policies in Iran: Pivotal Macro Considerations. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(222), 49-71. https://elt.tabrizu.ac.ir/?_action=articleInfo&article=633&lang=en Lau, R. (2003). Models of Decision Making. In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. David O. Sears, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Jervis. New York: Oxford University Press, 19–59. Liddicoat, A. J., Papademetre, L., Scarino, A., & Kohler, M. (2003). Report on Intercultural Language Learning. Canberra: DEST. Low, E. L., & Ao, R. (2018). The spread of English in ASEAN: Policies and issues. RELC Journal, 49(2), 131-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003368821878251 MacLure, M. (1993). Arguing for yourself: Identity as an organizing principle in teachers’ jobs and lives. British Educational Research Journal, 19(4), 311-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0141192930190401 Majdzadeh, M. (2002). Disconnection between Language and Culture: A Case Study of Iranian English Textbooks. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 474 691. McKay, S. L. (2003). Toward an appropriate EIL pedagogy: Re‐examining common ELT assumptions. International journal of applied linguistics, 13(1), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00035 Mirhosseini, S. A., & Badri, N. (2018). Perspectives of Iranian University Students on Learning English: A Practical Need and/or an International Policy-push. Changing English, 25(3), 286-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2018.1479959 Mirhosseini, S. A., & Khodakarami, S. (2015). A glimpse of contrasting de jure–de facto ELT policies in Iran. In English Language Teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, Trends and Challenges, edited by Chris Kennedy, 23–34. London: British Council. Mirhosseini, S. A., Shirazizadeh, M., & Pakizehdel, H. (2022). Bridging language education and “new literacy studies”: Reinvigorating courses of general English at an Iranian university. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 21(5), 287-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1791713 Mirhosseini, S. A., Tajik, L., & Bahrampour Pasha, A. (2023). Policies of English language teacher recruitment in Iran and a glimpse of their implementation. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 31(1), 37-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1881994 Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2019). Second language learning theories. Routledge. Morris, P., & Sweeting, A. (1995). Education and development in East Asia: An overview. In Morris, Paul. and Anthony Sweeting. eds, Garland, New York, pp 243–263. Narafshan, M. H., & Yamini, M. (2011). Policy and English language teaching (ELT) in Iran. Iranian EFL journal, 7(5), 179-189. http://www.iranian-efl-journal.com/ Nguyen, H. T. M. (2011). Primary English language education policy in Vietnam: insights from implementation. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 225-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203720080 Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia‐Pacific Region. TESOL quarterly, 37(4), 589-613. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588214 Park, M., & Sung, Y. K. (2013). Teachers' perceptions of the recent curriculum reforms and their implementation: what can we learn from the case of Korean elementary teachers. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(1), 15-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2012.756391 Parrish, A. (2019). Curriculum change in modern foreign languages education in England: barriers and possibilities. The Language Learning Journal, 48(5), 534-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1557733 Pavlenko, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as participation. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 155–178). Oxford: OUP. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American educational research journal, 44(4), 921-958. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/000283120730822 Rahimi, A., & Askari-Bigdeli, R. (2016). Challenges of action research: Insights from language institutes. Research in Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 3-15. https://rals.scu.ac.ir/article_12091_9d7a7479f6d2474d9cc1fa3201069af8.pdf Rassouli, A., & Osam, N. (2019). English language education throughout Islamic Republic reign in Iran: Government policies and people’s attitudes. SAGE Open, 9(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244019858435 Riazi, A. M., & Mosalanejad, N. (2010). Evaluation of Learning Objectives in Iranian High-School and Pre-University English Textbooks Using Bloom's Taxonomy. TESL-EJ, 13(4). https://tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej52/a5.pdf Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2007). Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 883-907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20180 Sarani, A., & Ahmadi, M. (2013). A study of vocational and non-vocational high school learners’ language proficiency and motivation. Advances in Asian Social Science, 4(3), 892-898. http://www.worldsciencepublisher.org/ Shahi, R., Khany, R., & Shoia, L. (2022). ‘The comparative analysis of local and international ELT curriculums: A systematic review and meta-analysis’ (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ilam University, Ilam, Iran Shhiba, S., & Embark, S. (2011). An investigation of Libyan EFL teachers’ conceptions of the communicative learner-centred approach in relation to their implementation of an English language curriculum innovation in secondary schools (Doctoral dissertation, Durham University). University of Durham, Durham, UK. Shin, J., Eslami, Z. R., & Chen, W. C. (2011). Presentation of local and international culture in current international English-language teaching textbooks. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 24(3), 253-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2011.614694 Smit, B. (2005). Teachers, local knowledge, and policy implementation: A qualitative policy-practice inquiry. Education and Urban Society, 37(3), 292-306. DOI: 10.1177/0013124505275426 Tawakni, M., & Tavakol, M. (2018). Problematizing EAP education in Iran: A critical ethnographic study of educational, political, and sociocultural roots. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 28-43. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.007 Tohidian, I., & Nodooshan, S. G. (2021). Teachers’ engagement within educational policies and decisions improves classroom practice: The case of Iranian ELT school teachers. Improving Schools, 24(1), 33-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1365480220906625 Tupas, R. (2018). (Un) framing language policy and reform in Southeast Asia. RELC Journal, 49(2), 149-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033688218772155 Tusi, B. (1998). Features of foreign language textbooks. University of Ferdowsi Mashhad, Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities, 30(1&2), 79-91. Victor, M. (1999). Learning English in Gabon: The question of cultural content. Language Culture and Curriculum, 12(1), 23-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07908319908666566 Wang, H. (2010). Translating policies into practice: The role of middle-level administrators in language curriculum implementation. Curriculum Journal, 21(2), 123-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585171003802637 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 86 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 21 |