دانشگاه تبریز
فهرست نشریات دارای اعتبار وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری
پایگاه استنادی علوم جهان اسلام (ISC)

 آمار

تعداد نشریات45
تعداد شماره‌ها1,559
تعداد مقالات19,030
تعداد مشاهده مقاله64,596,694
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله23,781,365
Kapoor, Mamta. (1405). Semi-analytical study for Jeffery-Hamel flow using Shehu HPM and Elzaki HPM – A comparative study. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(3), 1080-1102. doi: 10.22034/cmde.2025.64721.2939
Mamta Kapoor. "Semi-analytical study for Jeffery-Hamel flow using Shehu HPM and Elzaki HPM – A comparative study". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14, 3, 1405, 1080-1102. doi: 10.22034/cmde.2025.64721.2939
Kapoor, Mamta. (1405). 'Semi-analytical study for Jeffery-Hamel flow using Shehu HPM and Elzaki HPM – A comparative study', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(3), pp. 1080-1102. doi: 10.22034/cmde.2025.64721.2939
Kapoor, Mamta. Semi-analytical study for Jeffery-Hamel flow using Shehu HPM and Elzaki HPM – A comparative study. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1405; 14(3): 1080-1102. doi: 10.22034/cmde.2025.64721.2939

Semi-analytical study for Jeffery-Hamel flow using Shehu HPM and Elzaki HPM – A comparative study

Computational Methods for Differential Equations
مقاله 6، دوره 14، شماره 3، مهر 2026، صفحه 1080-1102    اصل مقاله (1.13 M)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/cmde.2025.64721.2939
نویسنده
Mamta Kapoor*
Marwadi University Research Center, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Marwadi University, Rajkot, 360003, Gujarat, India.
چکیده
Via this study, a discussion about Jeffery-Hamel fluid flow is provided, including fluid flow in converging/diverging channels, influenced by Reynolds number and Hartmann number. Two innovative semi-analytical techniques are introduced, referred to as the Shehu-HPM and Elzaki-HPM methods, to analyze the solution profiles of a model governing Jeffrey-Hamel fluid flow. These methods are developed by combining the Shehu transform with the Homotopy Perturbation Method (HPM), referred to as Method I, and the Elzaki transform with HPM, referred to as Method II. The performance of these techniques is evaluated under varying parameters, including the Reynolds number and the Hartmann number. These approaches are straightforward to implement and avoid the errors typically associated with discretization or quasi-linearization. Given the increasing demand for reliable solutions to fluid mechanics models, the proposed methods offer a valuable and practical alternative for solving such problems. Their simplicity and accuracy make them particularly suitable for a wide range of applications in this field. The novelty of this work lies in the hybridization of Shehu and Elzaki transforms with HPM, addressing gaps in the latest literature by providing novel techniques to address complex nonlinear fluid flow problems with improved accuracy and efficiency.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Shehu HPM؛ Elzaki HPM؛ Jefferey-Hamel fluid flow
مراجع
  • [1] O. Abu Arqub, Numerical solutions for the Robin time-fractional partial differential equations of heat and fluid flows based on the reproducing kernel algorithm, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow, 28(4) (2018), 828–856.
  • [2] O. Abu Arqub, Numerical simulation of time-fractional partial differential equations arising in fluid flows via reproducing kernel method, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow, 30(11) (2020), 4711–4733.
  • [3] O. A. Arqub and M. Al-Smadi, Numerical solutions of Riesz fractional diffusion and advection-dispersion equations in porous media using iterative reproducing kernel algorithm, J. Porous Media, 23(8) (2020).
  • [4] O. A. Arqub and N. Shawagfeh, Application of reproducing kernel algorithm for solving Dirichlet time-fractional diffusion-Gordon types equations in porous media, J. Porous Media, 22(4) (2019).
  • [5] W. Adel, K. E. Bi¸cer, and M. Sezer, A novel numerical approach for simulating the nonlinear MHD Jeffery–Hamel flow problem, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math., 7 (2021), 1–15.
  • [6] A. Ahmed, Jafari variation iteration method for solving one-dimensional fractional diffusion equation, Math. Anal. Contemp. Appl., 6(1) (2024), 49–58.
  • [7] Z. Alsalami, Modeling of Optimal Fully Connected Deep Neural Network based Sentiment Analysis on Social Networking Data, J. Smart Internet Things, 2022(1) (2023), 114–132.
  • [8] F. Alsidrani, A. Kılıçman, and N. Senu, A comprehensive review of the recent numerical methods for solving FPDEs, Open Math., 22(1) (2024), 20240036.
  • [9] Z. Asghar, R. S. Saif, and A. Z. Ghaffari, Numerical study of boundary stresses on Jeffery-Hamel flow subject to Soret/Dufour effects, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 237(5) (2023), 1088–1105.
  • [10] F. Aslanova, A comparative study of the hardness and force analysis methods used in truss optimization with metaheuristic algorithms and under dynamic loading, J. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol., 8(1) (2020), 25–33.
  • [11] U. Biswal and S. Chakraverty, Investigation of Jeffery-Hamel flow for nanofluid in the presence of magnetic field by a new approach in the optimal homotopy analysis method, J. Appl. Comput. Mech., 8(1) (2022), 48–59.
  • [12] U. Biswal, S. Chakraverty, and B. K. Ojha, Application of homotopy perturbation method in inverse analysis of Jeffery–Hamel flow problem, Eur. J. Mech.-B/Fluids, 86 (2021), 107–112.
  • [13] A. Boudjemline, I. Ahmad, S. Rehman, Hashim, and N. B. Khedher, Jeffery-Hamel flow extension and thermal analysis of Oldroyd-B nanofluid in expanding channel, J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn., 48(1) (2023), 75–90.
  • [14] A. El-Shenawy, M. El-Gamel, and M. Abd El-Hady, On the solution of MHD Jeffery–Hamel problem involving flow between two nonparallel plates with a blood flow application, Heat Transfer, 53(6) (2024), 2905–2933.
  • [15] A. C. Extra Loyinmi and T. K. Akinfe, Exact solutions to the family of Fisher’s reaction-diffusion equation using Elzaki homotopy transformation perturbation method, Eng. Rep., 2(2) (2020), e12084.
  • [16] R. Gautam, A. Sinha, H. R. Mahmood, N. Singh, S. Ahmed, N. Rathore, and M. S. Raza, Enhancing Handwritten Alphabet Prediction with Real-time IoT Sensor Integration in Machine Learning for Image, J. Smart Internet Things, 2022(1) (2023), 53–64.
  • [17] M. Hafeez, Hashim, and M. Khan, Jeffery–Hamel flow of hybrid nanofluids in convergent and divergent channels with heat transfer characteristics, Appl. Nanosci., 10 (2020), 5459–5468.
  • [18] H. Haowei, U. A. R. Hussein, Z. H. Al-Qaim, F. M. Altalbawy, A. A. Fadhil, M. M. Al-Taee, and M. Hekmatifar, Employing Sisko non-Newtonian model to investigate the thermal behavior of blood flow in a stenosis artery: Effects of heat flux, different severities of stenosis, and different radii of the artery, Alex. Eng. J., 68 (2023), 291–300.
  • [19] M. A. AL-Jawary and O. M. Salih, Effective Computational Methods for Solving the Jeffery-Hamel Flow Problem, Baghdad Sci. J., 20(3) (2023), 0853–0853.
  • [20] A. M. Jasim, New Analytical Study for Nanofluid between Two Non-Parallel Plane Walls (Jeffery-Hamel Flow), J. Appl. Comput. Mech., 7(1) (2021), 213–224.
  • [21] A. Kamran, E. Azhar, N. Akmal, Z. Mehmood, and Z. Iqbal, Finite difference approach for critical value analysis to describe Jeffery–Hamel flow toward an inclined channel with microrotations, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 47(12) (2022), 15261–15268.
  • [22] M. Kapoor and V. Joshi, A comparative study of Sumudu HPM and Elzaki HPM for coupled Burgers’ equation, Heliyon, 9(5) (2023).
  • [23] M. Kapoor, N. Bin Turki, and N. A. Shah, Study of fractional telegraph equation via Shehu homotopy perturbation method, Open Phys., 22(1) (2024), 20240029.
  • [24] M. Kapoor, N. A. Shah, S. Saleem, and W. Weera, An analytical approach for fractional hyperbolic telegraph equation using Shehu transform in one, two, and three dimensions, Math., 10(12) (2022), 1961.
  • [25] M. Kapoor, Analytical Approach for Solution of Linear and Non-linear Time-Fractional Schrödinger’s Equations by Employing Sumudu Transform Iterative Method, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math., 9(3) (2023), 38.
  • [26] A. S. Kelil and A. R. Appadu, Shehu-Adomian decomposition method for dispersive KdV-type equations, in Mathematical Analysis and Applications: MAA 2020, Jamshedpur, India, November 2–4, Springer Singapore, (2022), 103–129.
  • [27] K. A. Kshirsagar, V. R. Nikam, S. B. Gaikwad, and S. A. Tarate, An innovative computational approach for fuzzy space-time fractional telegraph equation via the new iterative transform method, Comput. Methods Differ. Equ., 12(4) (2024), 763–779.
  • [28] S. Kumbinarasaiah and K. R. Raghunatha, Numerical solution of the Jeffery–Hamel flow through the wavelet technique, Heat Transfer, 51(2) (2022), 1568–1584.
  • [29] S. Kumbinarasaiah, K. R. Raghunatha, and M. P. Preetham, Applications of Bernoulli wavelet collocation method in the analysis of Jeffery–Hamel flow and heat transfer in Eyring–Powell fluid, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 148(3) (2023), 1173–1189,
  • [30] M. Lakestani, J. Manafian, A. R. Najafizadeh, and M. Partohaghighi, Some new soliton solutions for the nonlinear fifth-order integrable equations, Comput. Methods Differ. Equ., 10(2) (2022), 445–460.
  • [31] M. I. Liaqat and A. Akgül, Approximate and Exact Solutions of Some Nonlinear Differential Equations Using the Novel Coupling Approach in the Sense of Conformable Fractional Derivative, Contemp. Math., 4132–4160 (2024).
  • [32] M. I. Liaqat, A. Akgül, and M. Bayram, Series and closed form solution of Caputo time-fractional wave and heat problems with the variable coefficients by a novel approach, Opt. Quantum Electron., 56(2) (2024), 203.
  • [33] A. J. Majeed and A. Z. J. A. Nabi, Three iterative methods for solving Jeffery-Hamel flow problem, Kuwait J. Sci., 47(1) (2020).
  • [34] J. Manafian, L. A. Dawood, and M. Lakestani, New solutions to a generalized fifth-order KdV-like equation with prime number p = 3 via a generalized bilinear differential operator, Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. Math., 9 (2024), 100600.
  • [35] J. Manafian and M. Lakestani, N-lump and interaction solutions of localized waves to the (2+1)-dimensional variable-coefficient Caudrey–Dodd–Gibbon–Kotera–Sawada equation, J. Geom. Phys., 150 (2020), 103598.
  • [36] J. Manafian and M. Lakestani, Application of tan(ϕ/2)-expansion method for solving the Biswas–Milovic equation for Kerr law nonlinearity, Optik, 127(4) (2016), 2040–2054.
  • [37] J. Manafian and M. Lakestani, Optical soliton solutions for the Gerdjikov–Ivanov model via tan(ϕ/2)-expansion method, Optik, 127(20) (2016), 9603–9620.
  • [38] J. Manafian and M. Lakestani, Abundant soliton solutions for the Kundu–Eckhaus equation via tan(ϕ(ξ))- expansion method, Optik, 127(14) (2016), 5543–5551.
  • [39] H. Ma, Research on promotion of lower limb movement function recovery after stroke by using lower limb rehabilitation robot in combination with constant velocity muscle strength training, in 2021 7th International Symposium on Mechatronics and Industrial Informatics (ISMII), IEEE, (2021), 70–73.
  • [40] R. A. Oderimu, K. A. Salaudeen, P. I. Farayola, and W. A. Tijani, Solution of Nonlinear Brusselator Model by a Combined Sawi Transform and Homotopy Analysis Method, International Conference and Advanced workshop on Modelling and Simulation of Complex Systems Department of Mathematics, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeri, (2024).
  • [41] D. Rezaee, A. Samari, and A. Mirsaeidi, Heat transfer in the Jeffery-Hamel flow of a yield-stress fluid, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 216 (2023), 124531.
  • [42] A. S. Rikani, Investigation of turbulent fluid flow in the presence of a magnetic field induced dynamic motion of the vessel, J. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol., 9(1) (2021), 74–94.
  • [43] M. Seyyedi and A. Molajou, Nanohydroxyapatite loaded-acrylated polyurethane nanofibrous scaffolds for controlled release of paclitaxel anticancer drug, J. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol., 9(1) (2021), 50–61.
  • [44] Vivek and M. Kumar, Bernoulli wavelet application to the numerical solution of Jeffery–Hamel flow problem, Numer. Heat Transf. Part B: Fundam., 1–20 (2024).
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 422
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 472


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب