The Effect of Low-Tech Response Systems on Students’ Engagement in Learning and Attitude in Under-Resourced EFL Classrooms: mini white-boards in focus

Barrett, S. K., & Arnett, T. (2018). Innovative Staffing to Personalize Learning: How New Teaching Roles and Blended Learning Help Students Succeed. Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation.

Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development (Vol. 96). Multilingual Matters.

Blatchford, P., Baines, E., & Pellegrini, A. (2003). The social context of school playground games: Sex and ethnic differences, and changes over time after entry to junior school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21(4), 481-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/026151003322535183

Brendefur, J. & Frykholm, J. (2000). Promoting Mathematical Communication in the Classroom: two preservice teachers' conceptions and practices, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, Vol. 3, 125–153.

Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & cognition, 20, 633-642.

Christle, C. A., & Schuster, J. W. (2003). The effects of using response cards on student participation, academic achievement, and on-task behavior during whole-class, math instruction. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12(3), 147-165. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1023/A:1025577410113

Clayton, M. C., & Woodard, C. (2007). The effect of response cards on participation and weekly quiz scores of university students enrolled in introductory psychology courses. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16(1), 250-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-007-9038-x

Du Plessis, P., & Mestry, R. (2019). Teachers for rural schools–a challenge for South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 39.

Eidissen, T. F. (2023). How mini–whiteboards can help teachers raise their level of communication in whole class plenary talks. Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13), Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics; Eötvös Loránd University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.

Fies, C., & Marshall, J. (2006). Classroom response systems: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 101-109.

Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117-142.

Forrester, T., Sandison, C. E., & Denny, S. (2017). A secondary mathematics teacher’s perception of her initial attempts at utilising whiteboarding in her classes. In A. Downton, S. Livy, & J. Hall (Eds.), 40 years on: We are still learning (pp. 1-8). Melbourne: MERGA.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109.

Gimbutas, E. C. (2019). The effects of using mini white-boards on the academic performance and engagement of students in a tenth-grade resource English language arts classroom [Master’s thesis, Rowan University]. Rowan.

Harper, S. R. (2009). Student engagement in higher education (p. 1). S. J. Quaye (Ed.). New York: Routledge.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.

Heaslip, G., Donovan, P., & Cullen, J. G. (2014). Student response systems and learner engagement in large classes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(1), 11-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469787413514648

Hunsu, N. J., Adesope, O., & Bayly, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102-119.

Inouye, C. Y., Bae, C. L., & Hayes, K. N. (2017). Using white-boards to support college students’ learning of complex physiological concepts. Advances in Physiology Education.

Kay, R. H., & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3), 819-827. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.001

Kombe, C. L., & Mtonga, D. E. (2021). Challenges and interventions of eLearning for under resourced students amid covid-19 lockdown: a case of a Zambian public university. Journal of Student Affairs in Africa, 9(1), 23-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.24085/jsaa.v9i1.1426

Koranteng, K. (2012). Access and use of information and communication technology for teaching and learning amongst schools in under resourced communities in the Western Cape, South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, Cape Peninsula University of Technology).

Lambert, M. C., Cartledge, G., Heward, W. L., & Lo, Y. Y. (2006). Effects of response cards on disruptive behavior and academic responding during math lessons by fourth-grade urban students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8(2), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007060080020701

Larouz, M., & El Messaoudi, M. (2023). Beyond Rote Drills: Proposing Novel Gamification Frameworks for Transformative Efl Classrooms. Journal of Studies in Language, Culture, and Society (JSLCS), 6(2), 1-19.

Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3), 517-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (2013). Counterpoint piece: The case for variety in corrective feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 167-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S027226311200071X

Macrie-Shuck, M., Talanquer, V. (2022). How students use whiteboards and its effects on group work. Journal of Chemical Education.

Maldonado Valarezo, R. A. (2024). Student engagement during the English class presentation stage through the use of mini whiteboards in Manuela Cañizares School [Undergraduate thesis, Universidad Nacional de Educación].

Martin, A. J. (2008). Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 239-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.11.003

Morais, A. M. (2016). “We can’t believe what we see”: Overcrowded classrooms through the eyes of student teacher. South African Journal of Education, 36(2), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.15700/saje.v36n2a1201

Musti-Rao, S., Kroeger, S. D., & Schumacher-Dyke, K. (2008). Using guided notes and response cards at the postsecondary level. Teacher Education and Special Education, 31(3), 149-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0888406408330630

Nagro, S. A., Hooks, S. D., Fraser, D. W., & Cornelius, K. E. (2018). Whole-group response strategies to promote student engagement in inclusive classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50(4), 243-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0040059918757947

Penuel, W. R., Boscardin, C. K., Masyn, K., & Crawford, V. M. (2007). Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings: A survey study. Educational Technology Research and development, 55, 315-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9023-4

Preszler, R. W., Dawe, A., Shuster, C. B., & Shuster, M. (2007). Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-09-0190

Schaffner, D., Schaffner, M., & Seaton, K. A. (2015). Whiteboarding in Senior Mathematics Classrooms. Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers Inc., 121.

Shahba, A. A. W., Soufan, W., Altwijri, O., Alsadoon, E., & Alkathiri, S. (2023). The impact of Student Response Systems (SRS) on student achievements: a university-scale study with deep Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA). Systems, 11(8), 384. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/systems11080384

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.

Singh, R. B. (2024). “Challenges and Coping Strategies of Teaching English in an Under-Resourced Context: A Narrative Inquiry”. APPROVED B (Doctoral dissertation, Kathmandu University School of Education).

Skinner, E. A. (2016). Engagement and disaffection as central to processes of motivational resilience and development. In Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 145-168). Routledge.

Staberg, R. L., Febri, M. I. M., Gjøvik, Ø., Sikko, S. A., & Pepin, B. (2023). Science teachers’ interactions with resources for formative assessment purposes. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 35(1), 5-35.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11092-022-09401-2

Stowell, J. R., & Nelson, J. M. (2007). Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of Psychology, 34(4), 253-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00986280701700391

Su, C. F., Lin, L. W., Hung, T. Y., Peng, C. C., Feng, C. C., & Lin, C. S. (2018). An evaluation of the use of student response systems in teaching diagnostic reasoning for physicians. Journal of Acute Medicine, 8(2), 60. http://dx.doi.org/10.6705/j.jacme.201806_8(2).0004

Swan, M. (2006). Collaborative learning in mathematics: A challenge to our beliefs and practices. London: National Institute for Advanced and Continuing Education (NIACE), for the National Research and Development

Tayeg, A. (2015). Effects of overcrowded classrooms on teacher-student interactions case study EFL students at Biskra University. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Biskra University, People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria

Tomaszewski, W., Xiang, N., Huang, Y., Western, M., McCourt, B., & McCarthy, I. (2022). The impact of effective teaching practices on academic achievement when mediated by student engagement: Evidence from Australian high schools. Education Sciences, 12(5), 358. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050358

UNESCO. (2018). Global education monitoring report 2017/18: Gender review. UNESCO.

Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and individual differences, 16(1), 1-12.

Wenning, C. J. (2005). Whiteboarding and Socratic dialogues: Questions and answers. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 3(1), 3-10.

Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2015). Embedding formative assessment: Practical techniques for K–12 classrooms. West Palm Beach, Fl: Learning

Wu, C. P. (2019). Exploring the effects of interactive response system (IRS) in an EFL grammar class. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, (5).

Zaman, M., Sajjad, S., & Gharsheen, L. U. (2023). Exploring The Dynamics of Teacher-Student Relationships in Overcrowded Secondary School Classrooms. International Research Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 4(4), 245-261.

Zens, A. (2021)."The Impact of Differentiated Learning Activities on Student Engagement and Motivation in the English Language Arts Classroom". [Master's thesis, Minnesota State University Moorhead]. https://red.mnstate.edu/thesis/611