آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,469 |
| تعداد مقالات | 17,958 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 58,287,945 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 19,747,789 |
Transcendental Philosophy and Linguistic Turn: Kantian echoes in Wittgenstein’s thought | ||
| مجله پژوهش های فلسفی | ||
| دوره 20، شماره 54، بهمن 1404، صفحه 201-218 اصل مقاله (961.61 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jpiut.2024.63697.3879 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| راوی کومار* 1؛ مادو مانگال چاتورودی2؛ آشوکا کومار تاراژ3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده فلسفه و فرهنگ، دانشگاه شری ماتا وایشنو دوی، کاترا، جامو و کشمیر، هند | ||
| 2استادیار دانشکده فلسفه و فرهنگ، دانشگاه شری ماتا وایشنو دوی، کاترا، جامو و کشمیر، هند | ||
| 3دانشیار دانشگاه راونشاو، کاتک، اودیشا، هند. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This paper explores the philosophical relationship between Immanuel Kant's transcendental idealism and Ludwig Wittgenstein's linguistic philosophy, particularly focusing on the echoes of Kant's ideas in Wittgenstein's work. Kant's Critique of Pure Reason argues that human cognition is shaped by a priori categories, which structure our experience of phenomena but leave the noumenal realm unknowable. Wittgenstein, in his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, similarly examines the limits of what can be known; suggesting that language mirrors reality but also has its limits in expressing what lies beyond logic. In his later work, Philosophical Investigations, Wittgenstein emphasizes the social and contextual nature of meaning, developed through "language games" and "forms of life". This paper argues that while Wittgenstein shifts from Kant’s universal transcendental structures to a more pragmatic view of language, both philosophers share a concern with the limits of human knowledge and expression. Furthermore, both thinkers acknowledge the ineffable about Kant’s noumenal world and Wittgenstein’s mystical realm as crucial yet unreachable domains. This comparative analysis contributes to contemporary discussions in epistemology and philosophy of language, demonstrating the enduring relevance of Kant’s transcendental insights in Wittgenstein’s linguistic turn. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Transcendental Idealism؛ Language Games؛ Limits of Knowledge؛ Kant؛ Wittgenstein؛ Linguistic Turn؛ Epistemology | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Cavell, S. (1979). The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality, and tragedy. Oxford University Press. Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-World: a commentary on Heidegger’s being and time, division I. MIT Press. Glock, H.-J. (1996). A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Blackwell Publishing. Hacker, M. S. (1997). Wittgenstein: Meaning and mind. Blackwell Publishing. Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. (M. J. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1785) Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1781) Kenny, A. (1973). Wittgenstein. Penguin Books. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue: A study in moral theory. University of Notre Dame Press. McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and World. Harvard University Press. Pears, D. (1971). Wittgenstein. Fontana Modern Masters. Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge University Press. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge University Press. Strawson, F. (1966). The Bounds of Sense: An essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Methuen. Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Harvard University Press. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Blackwell Publishing. Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. (G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright, Eds.). Harper & Row. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 610 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 78 |
||