آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,422 |
| تعداد مقالات | 17,547 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 56,712,872 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 18,808,766 |
The Kantian Self versus Pattern Theory of the Self | ||
| مجله پژوهش های فلسفی | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 18، شماره 47، 1403، صفحه 89-110 اصل مقاله (863.74 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jpiut.2024.62276.3801 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad Mahdi Moghadas* 1؛ Ali Fath Taheri2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Philosophy, Imam Khomeini International University, Iran | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Philosophy, Imam Khomeini International University, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| In the history of philosophy, the concept of the self has long been a subject of intense debate and scrutiny. Within Kant's critical philosophy, the self holds a significant position and is deemed essential for the very notion of experience. This article aims to clarify Kant's viewpoint on the concept of self. Kant posits the existence of an inner sense faculty, through which he introduces the empirical or phenomenal self, a concept that aligns with Hume's stance on the self. Furthermore, Kant introduces the idea of a noumenal self through the faculty of understanding and apperception, suggesting that this noumenal self is the foundation upon which all our experiences are made possible. Our primary objective is to clarify the distinctions between the two forms of self, which will be succeeded by an assessment of each. Although numerous scholars tend to view Kant's perspective on the self as a negative concept, an alternative viewpoint emerges, proposing a potential positive interpretation of Kant's concept of the self. Subsequently, we present Gallagher's Pattern theory of the self and conduct a comparative analysis between the Kantian self and the components that constitute the self. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| self؛ Kant؛ pattern theory of the self؛ noumenal self؛ phenomenal self | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Allison, H. E. (2001). Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. Yale University Press. Ameriks, K. (2000). Kant’s Theory of Mind 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press. Broad, C. (1978). Kant: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press Chessick, R. (1980). The Problematical Self in Kant and Kohut. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 49:3, 456-473, https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1980.11926923 Forgione, L. (2019). Kant and the problem of self-knowledge. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Gallagher, S. (2013). A pattern theory of self. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00443 Gergen, K. J. (2011). The social construction of self, in The Oxford Handbook of the Self, pp: 633–653, Edited by S. Gallagher Oxford University Press Hume, D. (2009). A Treatise of Human Nature, The Floating Press. Husserl, E. (1913). Ideas. General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by W.R.B. Gibson. Macmillan, Izard, C. E. (1972). Patterns of Emotions. A New Analysis of Anxiety and Depression. Academic Press. James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. Dover, 1950. Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Edited & translated by P. Guyer, & A. W Wood. Cambridge University Press. Kemp Smith, N. (1962). A Commentary to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Humanities Press. Kitcher, P. (1982). Kant on self-identity. The Philosophical Review, 91(1), 41-72. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2184668 Kraus, K. T. (2020). Kant on Self-Knowledge and Self-Formation: The Nature of Inner Experience. Cambridge University Press. Marshall, C. (2010). Kant's Metaphysics of the Self. Philosophers' Imprint N.10, pp. 1-21. McDowell, J. (2000). Mind and World. Harvard University Press. Melnick, A. (2009). Kant’s Theory of the Self. Translated by Taylor & Francis, Routledge. Neisser, U. (1988). Five kinds of self-knowledge. Philos. Psychol. 1, 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515088808572924. Schechtman, M. (2011). The narrative self, in The Oxford Handbook of the Self, pp: 394–416, Edited by S. Gallagher, Oxford University Press, Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/11299/184083/1/1_11_Sellars.pdf Sellars, W. (1970). ...this I or He or It (The thing) which thinks... Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 44, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/3129681 Strawson, P. (2007). The bounds of sense: an essay on Kant’s critique of pure reason. Routledge. Waxman, W. (1991). Kant’s Model of the Mind: A new interpretation of transcendental idealism. Oxford University Press. Wood, A. (1999). Kant's ethical thought. Cambridge University Press Zöller, G. (1993). Main Developments in Recent Scholarship on the Critique of Pure Reason. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 53(2), 445–466. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,230 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 408 |
||